Abstract:Social learning about mate choices is taxonomically widespread, and is a potentially important mechanism of social evolution that may affect the strength of sexual selection in a population. We used a meta-analytic approach to estimate the effect of mate-choice copying on reproductive decisions. We evaluated effect sizes across 103 experiments from 40 studies that experimentally measured female mate-choice copying in non-human animals representing Arachnida, Insecta, Malacostraca, Aves, and Actinoperygii. Our goals were to quantify the magnitude of the effect of this form of social influence, and the extent to which it is modified by observer experience, model age relative to the observer, attractiveness of prospective mates, and testing conditions (laboratory vs. free-living). Across all studies, females that observed others choosing a male were on average 2.71 times more likely to mate with that male, or with a phenotypically similar individual, compared to females with no social information (odds ratio 95% credible interval: 1.60–4.80). After corrected for publication bias, this effect remained significant (corrected odds ratio: 1.92, 95% credible interval 1.13–3.40). We found little evidence for phylogenetic effects in the occurrence of mate-choice copying. Indeed, studies herein present evidence for mate-choice copying in a broad cross-section of species, but also report exceptions in sister taxa. Social information from observed mate choices of others had a considerably stronger effect on mate choice in free-living subjects than in captive individuals. Inexperienced (virgin) females were more likely to copy mate choices than were experienced females, but the relative age of the model was unrelated to whether copying occurred. Finally, females were more likely to copy the mate choices of others when social information counteracted the observing female's personal or genetic mating preference. We note the need for increased taxonomic representation in tests of mate-choice copying, given the robust demonstration of effects in taxa studied to date. Such broader information will provide additional insight to the drivers of the differences identified here in tendency to copy mate choices of others.

Odor-based mate choice copying in deer mice is not affected by familiarity or kinship

Female BALB/c Mice Prefer the Odor of Mates Producing Fewer Progeny

The best smellers make the best choosers: mate choice is affected by female chemosensory receptor gene diversity in a mammal

Mate copying in Drosophila melanogaster males

A meta-analysis of factors influencing the strength of mate-choice copying in animals

Chemical mate choice copying in Drosophila melanogaster

Mechanisms of Social Influence: A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Social Information on Female Mate Choice Decisions

What matters to a mouse? Effects of internal and external context on male vocal response to female squeaks

Does Individual Variation in Male Mate Choice Copying Reflect Differences in Social Responsiveness?

Odour preferred males led to a higher offspring number in the common vole

MHC-dependent mate choice is linked to a trace-amine-associated receptor gene in a mammal

Investigating social communication in mice: A two‐intruders test approach

Rival Presence Leads to Reversible Changes in Male Mate Choice of a Desert Dwelling Ungulate

Sperm Competition Risk Affects Male Mate Choice Copying

Mice Recognise Mice in Neighbouring Rearing Cages and Change Their Social Behaviour

A Review of Suggested Mechanisms of MHC Odor Signaling

Female Mate Copying: Measuring the Effect of Mate-Relevant Information Provided by Former Partners

Conspecific Disturbance Odors Act As Alarm Cues to Affect Female Mate Choice in a Treefrog

Misleading mollies: The effect of an audience on the expression of mating preferences.

Aesthetic preference for artificially selected color variant affects mate choice copying behavior in female Poecilia latipinna

Male Fish Use Prior Knowledge about Rivals to Adjust Their Mate Choice.