Abstract:While carbon pricing is widely seen as a crucial element of climate policy and has been implemented in many countries, it also has met with strong resistance. We provide a comprehensive overview of public perceptions of the fairness of carbon pricing and how these affect policy acceptability. To this end, we review evidence from empirical studies on how individuals judge personal, distributional and procedural aspects of carbon taxes and cap-and-trade. In addition, we examine preferences for particular redistributive and other uses of revenues generated by carbon pricing and their role in instrument acceptability. Our results indicate a high concern over distributional effects, particularly in relation to policy impacts on poor people, in turn reducing policy acceptability. In addition, people show little trust in the capacities of governments to put the revenues of carbon pricing to good use. Somewhat surprisingly, most studies do not indicate clear public preferences for using revenues to ensure fairer policy outcomes, notably by reducing its regressive effects. Instead, many people prefer using revenues for 'environmental projects' of various kinds. We end by providing recommendations for improving public acceptability of carbon pricing. One suggestion to increase policy acceptability is combining the redistribution of revenue to vulnerable groups with the funding for environmental projects, such as on renewable energy.Key policy insights If people perceive carbon pricing instruments as fair, this increases policy acceptability and support.People's satisfaction with information provided by the government about the policy instrument increases acceptability.While people express high concern over uneven distribution of the policy burden, they often prefer using carbon pricing revenues for environmental projects instead of compensation for inequitable outcomes.Recent studies find that people's preferences shift to using revenues for making policy fairer if they better understand the functioning of carbon pricing, notably that relatively high prices of CO2-intensive goods and services reduce their consumption.Combining the redistribution of revenue to support both vulnerable groups and environmental projects, such as on renewable energy, seems to most increase policy acceptability.

A fairer and more effective carbon tax

The Design on China ' s Carbon Tax to Mitigate Climate Change

Addressing Climate Change Through a Low-Cost, High-Impact Carbon Tax

Carbon Tax: Moving Towards a Net-Zero Emissions Future

Planetary good governance after the Paris Agreement: The case for a global greenhouse gas tax

Assessing the effectiveness and fairness of carbon tax based on the water-energy-carbon nexus of household water use

Carbon Tax Burdens on Low-Income Households: A Reason for Delaying Climate Policy?

Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature

Optimal Dynamic Carbon Taxes in a Climate–Economy Model with Distortionary Fiscal Policy

How expensive should CO2 be? Fuel for the political debate on optimal climate policy

Policy Forum: Cross-Border and Multijurisdictional Issues in Carbon Taxation—Carbon Pricing and the Income Tax

Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes: A cost-efficient solution built on a pre-existing reward-based climate policy

DESIGNING A GLOBALLY ACCEPTABLE CARBON TAX SCHEME TO ADDRESS COMPETITIVENESS AND LEAKAGE CONCERNS

Comparative analysis of the carbon market and the carbon tax mechanisms efficiency to achieve the goals of the global carbon footprint reduction

Carbon tax as the most appropriate carbon pricing mechanism for developing countries and strategies to design an effective policy

Protecting the poor with a carbon tax and equal per capita dividend

Two Perspectives on Implementation of Carbon Tax Tackling Climate Change: A Literature review

Green Aid Tax Relief Participation Scheme – A Study about a Creative Environmental Tax Towards Carbon Reduction in the Post – Covid 19 Era

Climate action with revenue recycling has benefits for poverty, inequality and well-being

The fiscal implications of stringent climate policy

Low-carbon supply chain operations: impacts of carbon tax and fairness concerns