Abstract:Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of bilateral gluteal muscle contracture treated with inside-out iliotibial band release under arthroscopy in the supine position. Methods: A prospective non-randomized controlled trial. Forty-six patients admitted to the Department of Sports Medicine, Senior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from April 2021 to August 2022 for bilateral gluteal muscle contracture and proposed surgical treatment were enrolled. The subjects were divided into two groups according to the preferred surgical protocols of the patients: the supine position group was treated with inside-out iliotibial band release under arthroscopy in the supine position, and the operation in lateral position group was carried out with outside-in iliotibial band release under arthroscopy in the lateral position. The total duration of non-surgical operations and the total duration of surgical operations were recorded for all patients. The gluteal muscle contracture disability scale within 3 days before surgery and at least 2 months after surgery were compared between the two groups, and the occurrence of complications between the two groups was compared too. Results: There were 26 cases in the supine position group, 11 males and 15 females with a mean age of (31.8±7.3) years; and there were 20 cases in the lateral position group, 7 males and 13 females with a mean age of (30.6±6.3) years. The differences in gender, age, body mass index (BMI) and postoperative follow-up time between the two groups were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The total duration of non-surgical operations was shorter in the supine position group than in the lateral position group [(47.9±10.4) min vs (63.9±7.5) min, P<0.001]. There was no statistically significant difference in the total duration of surgical operations between the supine position group and the lateral position group [31.0(27.0, 43.5) min vs 33.0(24.8, 38.0) min, P>0.05]. The postoperative gluteal muscle contracture disability scales were significantly improved in both the supine position and lateral position groups when compared with those before the operation [93.0 (85.0, 98.0) vs 61.0 (50.5, 66.8), P<0.001 and 88.5±6.9 vs 63.6±9.6, P<0.001, respectively]. There was no statistically significant difference in the gluteal muscle contracture disability scale between the supine position and lateral position groups before and 2 months after surgery [59.3±11.9 vs 63.6±9.6 and 93.0 (85.0, 98.0) vs 89.5(84.0, 94.8), both P>0.05, respectively]. Two patients in each group developed subcutaneous hematoma after surgery, and all of them resolved within 2 weeks after surgery, the difference in complication incidence rate was not statistically significant (P>0.05). No postoperative complications such as fat liquefaction in the operated area, infection, decreased hip abductor muscle strength or nerve injury in the lower extremity were observed in both groups. Conclusion: The treatment of bilateral gluteal muscle contracture by inside-out iliotibial band release under arthroscopy in the supine position can effectively improve clinical efficiency, with definite efficacy, and it is an operative program worth promoting.

Arthroscopic C-Shaped Release Around the Greater Trochanter for Gluteal Muscle Contracture

Arthroscopic release around the greater trochanter in gluteal muscle contracture

[Clinical Efficacy of Modified Arthroscopic Revision Release of Gluteal Muscle Contracture With Residual Symptoms After Open Surgery]

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Surgery in Patients with Gluteal Muscle Contracture: Single-Institution Results from a High-Volume Cohort

New minimally invasive option for the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture

Arthroscopic Gluteal Muscle Contracture Release with Radiofrequency Energy.

[Clinical classification of gluteal muscle contracture under arthroscopy]

Arthroscopic revision release of gluteal muscle contracture after failed primary open surgery

[Clinical efficacy of the treatment of bilateral gluteal muscle contracture by inside-out iliotibial band release under arthroscopy in the supine position]

[Release of Gluteal Muscle Contracture by Radiofrequency under Arthroscopy].

The Treatment of Gluteal Muscle Contracture by Release of Iliotibia Tract

The role of arthroscopic release of gluteal muscle contracture in improving patellofemoral instability

The Release of Gluteal Muscle Contracture by Radiofrequency Vaporization under Arthroscopic Guidance

[Insertion of gluteus maximus tendo-chilles lengthening with Z-shaped for the treatment of severe gluteal muscle contracture]

Comparison of the clinical effects of arthroscopic surgery vs. open surgery for grade II gluteal muscle contracture in adults

Comparison of arthroscopic versus open surgery on external snapping hip caused by gluteal muscle contracture

Arthroscopic radiofrequency lysis for treatment of gluteal muscle contracture

Comparison of the incisions for the open surgical treatment of gluteal muscle contracture

Clinical results of arthroscopic tight fibrous band release for adult moderate-to-severe gluteal fibrosis using anterior and posterior portals: a retrospective analysis of 118 consecutive cases

Arthroscope monitored solution of adult intramuscular injection associated gluteal muscle contracture by radiofrequency

Typing of gluteal muscle contracture and its arthroscopy minimum invasion treatment