Abstract:BackgroundSystematic reviews have established the short‐term improvements of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures compared to conventional surgical treatment in intrabony defects. However, a hierarchy of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures regarding the medium‐ to long‐term results of treatment does not exist. AimTo systematically assess the literature to answer the focused question "In periodontitis patients with intrabony defects, what are the medium‐ and long‐term benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures compared with open flap debridement (OFD), in terms of clinical and/or radiographic outcome parameters and tooth retention?" Material & MethodsRandomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), reporting on clinical and/or radiographic outcome parameters of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures ≥ 3 years post‐operatively were systematically assessed. Clinical [residual probing pocket depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, tooth loss] and radiographic [residual defect depth (RDD), bone gain (RBL)] outcome parameters, were assessed. Descriptive statistics were calculated and Bayesian random‐effects network meta‐analyses (NMA) were performed where possible. ResultsThirty RCTs, presenting data 3 to 20 years after treatment with grafting, GTR, EMD, as monotherapies, combinations thereof, and/or adjunctive use of blood derived growth factor constructs, or with OFD only, were included. NMA based on 21 RCTs showed that OFD was clearly the least efficacious treatment; regenerative/reconstructive treatments resulted in significantly shallower residual PD in 4 out 8 comparisons [range of mean differences (MD): ‐2.37 to ‐0.60 mm] and larger CAL gain in 6 out 8 comparisons (range of MD: 1.26 to 2.66 mm), and combination approaches appeared as the most efficacious. Tooth loss after regenerative/reconstructive treatment was less frequent (0.4%) compared to OFD (2.8%), but the evidence was sparse. There was only sparse radiographic data not allowing any relevant comparisons. ConclusionPeriodontal regenerative/reconstructive therapy in intrabony defects results, in general, in shallower residual PD and larger CAL gain compared with OFD, translating in high rates of tooth survival, on a medium (3‐5 years) to long‐term basis (5‐20 years). Combination approaches appear, in general, more efficacious compared to monotherapy in terms of shallower residual PD and larger CAL gain. A clear hierarchy could, however, not be established due to limited evidence.

Minimally invasive non‐surgical periodontal therapy of intrabony defects: A prospective multi‐centre cohort study

Minimally invasive non-surgical vs. surgical approach for periodontal intrabony defects: a randomised controlled trial

Clinical and GCF outcomes of Minimally-invasive non-surgical periodontal therapy in teeth with bone loss to the apex. A prospective study

Two-year Follow-Up of the Outcomes of Endoscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Nonsurgical Periodontal Therapy for Deep Intrabony Defects

Clinical and patient-centered outcomes after minimally invasive non-surgical or surgical approaches for the treatment of intrabony defects: a randomized clinical trial

Non‐Surgical Treatment of Moderate Periodontal Intrabony Defects With Adjunctive Cross‐Linked Hyaluronic Acid: A Single‐Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Efficacy of periodontal minimally invasive surgery with and without regenerative materials for treatment of intrabony defect: a randomized clinical trial

Improved wound stability with a modified minimally invasive surgical technique in the regenerative treatment of isolated interdental intrabony defects.

Modified minimally invasive surgical technique in human intrabony defects with or without regenerative materials-10-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial: Tooth retention, periodontitis recurrence, and costs

Medium‐ and long‐term clinical benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures in intrabony defects: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical studies

Clinical effectiveness of regenerative periodontal surgery and orthodontic tooth movement with clear aligners in stage IV periodontitis: a case series

A minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative in the regenerative treatment of intra-bony defects: a novel approach to limit morbidity.

Single minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative to treat multiple adjacent intra-bony defects: clinical outcomes and patient morbidity.

Microsurgical approach to periodontal regeneration. Initial evaluation in a case cohort.

Improved Wound Stability with a Modified Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique in the Regenerative Treatment of Isolated Interdental Intrabony Defects

Modified Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique in Human Intrabony Defects with or without Regenerative Materials

Minimally invasive surgical technique and enamel matrix derivative in intra-bony defects. I: Clinical outcomes and morbidity.

Clinical Research Progress in the Treatment of Intrabony Defect by Minimally Invasive Periodontal Surgery

Autogenous periosteal barrier membranes and bone grafts in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects of single-rooted teeth: a 12-month reentry randomized controlled clinical trial

Modified Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique Plus Bio-Oss Collagen for Regenerative Therapy of Isolated Interdental Intrabony Defects: Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the modified minimally invasive surgical technique with and without regenerative materials: a randomized-controlled trial in intra-bony defects.