Abstract:Although administrative law doctrine requires courts to defer to an agency’s reasonable statutory interpretation, the doctrine is unclear as to whether an agency gets less deference when it changes its own prior interpretation. We formally analyze how judicial deference to revised agency interpretations affects those interpretations’ ideological content. We find a non-monotonic relationship between judicial deference to inconsistent agency interpretations and interpretive extremism. This arises because as courts become less deferential to revised interpretations, the initial agency finds a moderate interpretation that will not be revised more appealing. Normatively, our results suggest that an interest in responsiveness of interpretive policy to the preferences of the incumbent leadership favors deference to revised interpretations, while an interest in ideological moderation favors a somewhat less deferential posture to interpretive revisions. * We are grateful to Louis Kaplow, Daryl Levinson, and Eric Posner for helpful comments on earlier drafts. † John M. Olin Fellow in Law and Economics, Harvard Law School. ‡ Assistant Professor, Harvard Law School. Federal agencies in the United States have a great deal of flexibility in interpreting the statutes they administer. Although an agency may not contravene clear statutory directives, a reviewing court is supposed to defer to an agency’s reasonable construction of an ambiguous statute, even if the court believes a different interpretation is superior. Put another way, the reviewing court’s obligation is not to ascertain the best “point estimate” of statutory meaning, but rather to define the bounds of a “policy space” from which the agency can select its preferred interpretation (Elliott 2005; Stephenson and Vermeule 2009). But what if the agency changes its interpretive position? Should courts be any less deferential to an agency interpretation that differs substantially from the agency’s own prior interpretation, if the new interpretation would have been upheld as reasonable if it had been adopted in the first instance? Current doctrine is less clear on the answer to this question. This paper considers one aspect of this issue: whether, or under what conditions, reducing the degree of judicial deference to an inconsistent agency interpretation will lead an agency’s interpretation to be more aggressive (i.e., closer to the preferred position of the incumbent leadership) or more moderate (i.e., closer to the midpoint between the ideal interpretations of the incumbent party and the opposition party). We consider both the agency’s initial interpretive choice—when the agency is writing on a clean slate, with no prior agency interpretation—and the decision of the agency at a later time, under the control of a different presidential administration with different policy preferences. Our most important finding is that there is a non-monotonic relationship between the degree of judicial deference to revised agency interpretations and the aggressiveness of the agency’s initial interpretation. When courts are very likely to defer to a revised

High-level aminoglycoside resistance in enterococci.

History and Rationale of Oral Rehydration and Recent Developments in Formulating an Optimal Solution

Inhibition of the growth of cultured cells by arginase and soluble proteins from mouse skin.

A more physiological feeding process in ICU: Intermittent infusion with semi-solid nutrients (CONSORT-compliant).

Protein-based oral rehydration solutions for patients with an ileostomy: a randomised, double-blinded crossover study

Investigations into sources of lead in the environment of urban children.

Über Exakte und Nicht Exakte Registrierung des Menschlichen Elektrokardiogramms

Vitamin drinks improve palatability and reduce adverse events associated to polyethylene glycol electrolyte solutions

Post-exercise rehydration: Comparing the efficacy of three commercial oral rehydration solutions

Evaluation of oral hypo‐osmolar glucose‐based and rice‐based oral rehydration solutions in the treatment of cholera in children

Optimizing Recovery in Elderly Patients: Anabolic Benefits of Glucose Supplementation during the Rehydration Period

Changes in lipoproteins associated with methotrexate or combination therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis trial.

On the Fourier Extension of Nonperiodic Functions

Comparison of Glucose/Electrolyte and Glucose/Glycine/Electrolyte Oral Rehydration Solutions in Hospitalized Children with Diarrhea in Costa Rica

Changes in chemical and sensory properties of Amarone wine produced by Penicillium infected grapes.

OLIN CENTER FOR LAW , ECONOMICS , AND BUSINESS JUDICIAL DEFERENCE TO INCONSISTENT AGENCY STATUTORY INTERPRETATIONS

Comparison of an Oral Rice‐Based Electrolyte Solution and a Glucose‐Based Electrolyte Solution in Hospitalized Infants with Diarrheal Dehydration

Effectiveness of ORSL® Variants as an Adjuvant along with Standard-of-care Treatment in the Restoration of Oral Fluid, Electrolytes, and Energy in Patients with Fever and/or General Weakness in Indian Patients in an Outpatient Setting

Cold-induced vasodilatation following traumatic median or ulnar nerve injury.

Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic progenitor cells is associated with downregulation of α4 integrin- and CXCR4-mediated engraftment in NOD/SCID β2-microglobulin-null mice

Effects of ingesting beverages containing glycerol and sodium with isomaltulose or sucrose on fluid retention in young adults: a single-blind, randomized crossover trial