Improving the predictive potential of diffusion MRI in schizophrenia using normative models-Towards subject-level classification

Doron Elad,Suheyla Cetin-Karayumak,Fan Zhang,Kang Ik K Cho,Amanda E Lyall,Johanna Seitz-Holland,Rami Ben-Ari,Godfrey D Pearlson,Carol A Tamminga,John A Sweeney,Brett A Clementz,David J Schretlen,Petra Verena Viher,Katharina Stegmayer,Sebastian Walther,Jungsun Lee,Tim J Crow,Anthony James,Aristotle N Voineskos,Robert W Buchanan,Philip R Szeszko,Anil K Malhotra,Matcheri S Keshavan,Martha E Shenton,Yogesh Rathi,Sylvain Bouix,Nir Sochen,Marek R Kubicki,Ofer Pasternak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25574
2021-10-01
Abstract:Diffusion MRI studies consistently report group differences in white matter between individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and healthy controls. Nevertheless, the abnormalities found at the group-level are often not observed at the individual level. Among the different approaches aiming to study white matter abnormalities at the subject level, normative modeling analysis takes a step towards subject-level predictions by identifying affected brain locations in individual subjects based on extreme deviations from a normative range. Here, we leveraged a large harmonized diffusion MRI dataset from 512 healthy controls and 601 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, to study whether normative modeling can improve subject-level predictions from a binary classifier. To this aim, individual deviations from a normative model of standard (fractional anisotropy) and advanced (free-water) dMRI measures, were calculated by means of age and sex-adjusted z-scores relative to control data, in 18 white matter regions. Even though larger effect sizes are found when testing for group differences in z-scores than are found with raw values (p < .001), predictions based on summary z-score measures achieved low predictive power (AUC < 0.63). Instead, we find that combining information from the different white matter tracts, while using multiple imaging measures simultaneously, improves prediction performance (the best predictor achieved AUC = 0.726). Our findings suggest that extreme deviations from a normative model are not optimal features for prediction. However, including the complete distribution of deviations across multiple imaging measures improves prediction, and could aid in subject-level classification.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?