Inside out or outside in: does atopic dermatitis disrupt barrier function or does disruption of barrier function trigger atopic dermatitis?

N. Silverberg,J. Silverberg
Abstract:VOLUME 96, DECEMBER 2015 359 WWW.CUTIS.COM Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a multifactorial inflammatory disorder with an estimated prevalence of 279,889,120 cases worldwide.1 Most cases of AD begin in early childhood (with almost 85% developing by 5 years of age),2 but recent studies have found that 40% to over 80% of cases persist into adulthood.1,3,4 Although a previous study focused largely on T helper type 1/T helper type 2 (Th2) immune dysregulation as the pathogenesis of the disease,5 disruption of the skin barrier and systemic inflammation are at the center of current AD research. In AD, breakdown of the skin barrier results in increased transepidermal water loss, reduced skin hydration, and increased antigen presentation by Langerhans cells initiating inflammation.6-8 The cascade largely activated is the Th2 and T helper type 22 cascade with resultant cytokine release (ie, IL-4, IL-13, IL-2, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IL-22, tumor necrosis factor α, interferon γ).9,10 In active AD, Th2 inflammation and barrier breakdown result in reduced filaggrin and claudin 1 expression, resulting in further exacerbation of the barrier defect and enhancing the risk of development of asthma and hay fever as well as transcutaneous sensitization to a variety of food allergens (eg, peanuts).9,11,12 Although all of these immunologic features are well established in AD, controversy remains as to whether AD is caused by systemic inflammation triggering barrier dysfunction (the “inside-out” hypothesis) or from the epidermal skin barrier disruption triggering immunologic imbalance (the “outside-in” hypothesis).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?