Abstract:All organisms sense and respond to pathogenic challenge. Tissue-specific responses are required to combat pathogens infecting distinct cell types. Cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) are produced endogenously downstream of pathogen recognition or by pathogens themselves which bind to STING to activate NF-kB-dependent antimicrobial gene expression programs. It remains unknown whether there are distinct immune responses to CDNs in Drosophila tissues. Here, we investigated tissue specific CDN-STING responses and uncovered differences in gene-induction patterns across tissues that play important roles in viral infections. Using tissue-and cell-specific genetic studies we found that dSTING in the fat body controls CDN-induced expression of dSTING-regulated gene 1 ( Srg1 ) but not dSTING-regulated gene 2 ( Srg2 ) or 3 ( Srg3 ). In contrast, the gastrointestinal tract largely controls expression of Srg2 and Srg3 . We found that Srg3 is antiviral against the natural fly pathogen Drosophila C virus and the human arthropod-borne Rift Valley Fever virus (RVFV), but not other arthropod-borne viruses including Sindbis virus and dengue virus. Furthermore, we found that Srg3 has an important role in controlling RVFV infection of the ovary which has important implications in understanding vertical transmission of viruses and RVFV in mosquitoes. Overall, our study underscores the importance of tissue-specific responses in antiviral immunity and highlights the complex tissue regulation of the CDN-STING pathway. The cyclic dinucleotide (CDN)-STING pathway (CDN-STING pathway) is a highly conserved innate immune pathway that stimulates the production of antiviral genes in response to infection. We found that diverse fly tissues respond to CDN stimulation, but dSTING regulates distinct subsets of genes across tissues. We also found that the CDN regulated gene, dSTING regulated gene 3 ( Srg3 ), was antiviral against the human arbovirus Rift Valley Fever virus but not dengue or Sindbis virus. Furthermore, we found that Srg3 has an important role in controlling RVFV infection of the ovary which has important implications in vertical transmission of viruses such as RVFV. These findings highlight the tissue-specific activity of the CDN-STING pathway and emphasize the importance of understanding how different tissues sense and integrate immune signals during pathogenic challenge.

Two cGAS-like receptors induce antiviral immunity in Drosophila

cGAS-like receptors sense RNA and control 3′2′-cGAMP signalling in Drosophila

The virus-induced cyclic dinucleotide 2'3'-c-di-GMP mediates STING-dependent antiviral immunity in Drosophila

The virus-induced cyclic dinucleotide 2′3′-c-di-GMP mediates STING-dependent antiviral immunity in Drosophila

A universe of second messengers for cGLR-STING signaling.

cGAS-like receptors drive a systemic STING-dependent host response in Drosophila

cGLRs are a diverse family of pattern recognition receptors in animal innate immunity

Roles of Emerging RNA-Binding Activity of cGAS in Innate Antiviral Response

Cgas Facilitates Sensing of Extracellular Cyclic Dinucleotides to Activate Innate Immunity

cGAS–STING‐mediated novel nonclassic antiviral activities

CBASS to cGAS-STING: The Origins and Mechanisms of Nucleotide Second Messenger Immune Signaling

cGAS is activated by DNA-induced oligomerization and has pivotal roles in antiviral defense and immune adjuvant effects

Characterization of Cgas Homologs in Innate and Adaptive Mucosal Immunities in Zebrafish Gives Evolutionary Insights into Cgas-Sting Pathway.

The Mechanism of Double-Stranded DNA Sensing Through the Cgas-Sting Pathway.

Regulation of cGAS- and RLR-mediated immunity to nucleic acids

Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate Synthase (cGAS), a Multifaceted Platform of Intracellular DNA Sensing

Cellular functions of cGAS-STING signaling

Bacterial cGAS senses a viral RNA to initiate immunity

Cyclic GMP–AMP signalling protects bacteria against viral infection

Pivotal Roles of Cgas-Cgamp Signaling in Antiviral Defense and Immune Adjuvant Effects

Tissue specific innate immune responses impact viral infection in Drosophila