Abstract:The problem of visual question answering (VQA) is of significant importance both as a challenging research question and for the rich set of applications it enables. In this context, however, inherent structure in our world and bias in our language tend to be a simpler signal for learning than visual modalities, resulting in VQA models that ignore visual information, leading to an inflated sense of their capability. We propose to counter these language priors for the task of VQA and make vision (the V in VQA) matter! Specifically, we balance the popular VQA dataset (Antol et al., in: ICCV, 2015) by collecting complementary images such that every question in our balanced dataset is associated with not just a single image, but rather a pair of similar images that result in two different answers to the question. Our dataset is by construction more balanced than the original VQA dataset and has approximately twice the number of image-question pairs. Our complete balanced dataset is publicly available at http://visualqa.org/ as part of the 2nd iteration of the VQA Dataset and Challenge (VQA v2.0). We further benchmark a number of state-of-art VQA models on our balanced dataset. All models perform significantly worse on our balanced dataset, suggesting that these models have indeed learned to exploit language priors. This finding provides the first concrete empirical evidence for what seems to be a qualitative sense among practitioners. We also present interesting insights from analysis of the participant entries in VQA Challenge 2017, organized by us on the proposed VQA v2.0 dataset. The results of the challenge were announced in the 2nd VQA Challenge Workshop at the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017. Finally, our data collection protocol for identifying complementary images enables us to develop a novel interpretable model, which in addition to providing an answer to the given (image, question) pair, also provides a counter-example based explanation. Specifically, it identifies an image that is similar to the original image, but it believes has a different answer to the same question. This can help in building trust for machines among their users.

'Just because you are right, doesn't mean I am wrong': Overcoming a Bottleneck in the Development and Evaluation of Open-Ended Visual Question Answering (VQA) Tasks

Question-Guided Semantic Dual-Graph Visual Reasoning with Novel Answers.

Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering

A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledge

VQA: Visual Question Answering

AI-VQA

AI-VQA: Visual Question Answering based on Agent Interaction with Interpretability

Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answering

Right this way: Can VLMs Guide Us to See More to Answer Questions?

Proposing Plausible Answers for Open-ended Visual Question Answering

Towards Flexible Evaluation for Generative Visual Question Answering

Open-ended VQA benchmarking of Vision-Language models by exploiting Classification datasets and their semantic hierarchy

Being Negative but Constructively: Lessons Learnt from Creating Better Visual Question Answering Datasets

Guiding Vision-Language Model Selection for Visual Question-Answering Across Tasks, Domains, and Knowledge Types

Convincing Rationales for Visual Question Answering Reasoning

A Dataset and Baselines for Visual Question Answering on Art

The VQA-Machine: Learning How to Use Existing Vision Algorithms to Answer New Questions

On the Flip Side: Identifying Counterexamples in Visual Question Answering

Visual Question Answering Method Based on Counterfactual Thinking

Evaluating Open-QA Evaluation