Clinical features of LRP4/agrin-antibody-positive myasthenia gravis: A multicenter study
Michael H Rivner,Brandy M Quarles,Jin-Xiu Pan,Zheng Yu,James F Howard Jr,Andrea Corse,Mazen M Dimachkie,Carlayne Jackson,Tuan Vu,George Small,Robert P Lisak,Jerry Belsh,Ikjae Lee,Richard J Nowak,Vanessa Baute,Stephen Scelsa,J Americo Fernandes,Zachary Simmons,Andrea Swenson,Richard Barohn,R Bhavaraju Sanka,Clifton Gooch,Eroboghene Ubogu,James Caress,Mamatha Pasnoor,Hongyan Xu,Lin Mei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.26985
Abstract:Introduction: Our aim in this study was to identify the prevalence and clinical characteristics of LRP4/agrin-antibody-positive double-seronegative myasthenia gravis (DNMG). Methods: DNMG patients at 16 sites in the United States were tested for LRP4 and agrin antibodies, and the clinical data were collected. Results: Of 181 DNMG patients, 27 (14.9%) were positive for either low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) or agrin antibodies. Twenty-three DNMG patients (12.7%) were positive for both antibodies. More antibody-positive patients presented with generalized symptoms (69%) compared with antibody-negative patients (43%) (P ≤ .02). Antibody-positive patients' maximum classification on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) scale was significantly higher than that for antibody-negative patients (P ≤ .005). Seventy percent of antibody-positive patients were classified as MGFA class III, IV, or V compared with 39% of antibody-negative patients. Most LRP4- and agrin-antibody-positive patients (24 of 27, 89%) developed generalized myathenia gravis (MG), but with standard MG treatment 81.5% (22 of 27) improved to MGFA class I or II during a mean follow-up of 11 years. Discussion: Antibody-positive patients had more severe clinical disease than antibody-negative patients. Most DNMG patients responded to standard therapy regardless of antibody status.