Comparing High-Frequency With Monophasic Electroporation Protocols in an In Vivo Beating Heart Model

Eyal Heller,Tomas Garcia-Sanchez,Yonatan Moshkovits,Raul Rabinovici,Dvora Grynberg,Amit Segev,Samuel J Asirvatham,Antoni Ivorra,Elad Maor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2021.05.003
Abstract:This study compared monophasic 100-μs pulses with high-frequency electroporation (HF-EP) bursts using an in vivo animal model. Myocardial damage was evaluated by histologic analysis. Compared with 10 monophasic pulses, 20 bursts of HF-EP at 100 and 150 kHz were associated with less damage. However, when the number of HF-EP bursts was increased to 60, myocardial damage was comparable to that of the monophasic group. HF-EP protocols were associated with attenuated collateral muscle contractions. This study shows that HF-EP is feasible and effective and that pulse frequency has a significant effect on extent of ablation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?