The Leuven Prolonged Acute Stress Test (L-PAST): A Novel Paradigm to Induce a Subjective and Glucocorticoid Stress Response for at Least Ninety Minutes

Danique La Torre,Boushra Dalile,Tim Vanuytsel,Lukas Van Oudenhove,Kristin Verbeke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107047
IF: 4.693
2024-04-14
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Abstract:Laboratory stress tests typically administer stress acutely, ranging from 3 to 15 minutes. However, everyday stressors usually last longer than ten minutes (e.g., examination stressors, work stressors, and social stressors. Moreover, in some studies, it may be relevant to induce stress for a longer period to affect certain psychological or physiological parameters. To this end, we developed a novel stress test that intends to induce psychosocial stress for 90 minutes. The Leuven Prolonged Acute Stress Test (L-PAST) combines physical (hand immersion in cold water), cognitive (mental arithmetic), and psychosocial (social evaluation and feelings of failure) stress elements of two well-known laboratory stress tests, the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) and the Montreal Imaging Stress Test (MIST). Fifty healthy women were subjected to both the L-PAST and a sham (control) test in a randomized and counterbalanced manner. The stress response was determined by salivary cortisol measurements and assessment of subjective stress ratings at regular time points during the time preceding the stress period (5 min), the stress period (90 min), and the recovery period (35 min). Cognitive reactivity to failure and subjective pain levels were also assessed at various time points. The childhood trauma questionnaire (CTQ) and the perceived stress scale (PSS) were administered prior to the testing phase. As expected, linear mixed models revealed that the stress response was significantly higher during the L-PAST as indicated by a significant time point by condition interaction effect for both the cortisol response ( F (10,450) =12.21, p < 0.0001, ηp 2 =0.11) and the subjective stress response (F (13,637) =13.98, p < 0.0001, ηp 2 = 0.12). Moreover, there was a significant time point by condition interaction effect for cognitive reactivity to failure (F (13,637) = 7.97, p < 0.0001, ηp 2 = 0.07) and subjective pain (F (13,637) = 38.52, p < 0.0001, ηp 2 = 0.27), indicating that the levels were higher during the L-PAST at most stress induction time points. Lastly, higher CTQ scores were associated with higher subjective pain levels during the L-PAST (F (1,44) =6.05, p = 0.02). Collectively, our results confirm the efficacy of the L-PAST in inducing a prolonged subjective as well as cortisol stress response.
neurosciences,endocrinology & metabolism,psychiatry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?