Comparing Theory of Mind Development in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental Language Disorder, and Typical Development
Esther Schwartz Offek,Osnat Segal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S331988
IF: 2.989
2022-10-14
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Abstract:Esther Schwartz Offek, Osnat Segal Department of Communication Disorders, The Stanley Steyer School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Correspondence: Osnat Segal, Department of Communication Disorders, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, Tel Aviv, Israel, Tel +972 522998404, Email ; Background: Theory of mind (ToM) is the ability to recognize, comprehend, and consider oneself's and others' mental states and perspectives to predict and explain behaviors and motivations. It is widely accepted that children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) experience difficulties with ToM. However, there are also findings suggesting that ToM abilities might also be compromised in children with Developmental Language Disorders (DLD). Purpose: To assess ToM abilities in three groups of children: 1. ASD with no language difficulties; 2. DLD, known for their language disorder; and 3. TD with no language issues. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 preschool children aged 5-to-6 were examined and assigned to one of the three groups based on previous clinical reports and a standardized Hebrew language assessment tool. Nonverbal IQ was established with a standardized test to verify within average range placement (> 75 IQ). ToM skills were examined with a Hebrew version of the ToM Task Battery and parent's questionnaire (ToMI). Results: Children with ASD had significantly lower ToM scores compared to the children with DLD, and TD. The ToM scores of the children with DLD were similar to the scores of the TD children. According to the parents' questionnaires, both the ASD children and the DLD children had less developed ToM skills compared to their TD peers. Conclusion: The present findings suggest that children with ASD have a fundamental difficulty in ToM that is independent of their language abilities. Children with DLD show difficulties in everyday social interactions that involve ToM. It is possible that both ASD and language disorders influence ToM development, suggesting that different developmental routes affect the acquisition of ToM. Keywords: autism, DLD, ToM, ToMTB, ToMI ToM is considered as the capacity to represent and understand mental states, emotions, motivations, and oneself's and others' beliefs. 1 Children and adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) often present difficulties in ToM, and this impedes their participation in social contexts. 2–4 In fact, the ToM Hypothesis for Autism suggests that difficulties in ToM are the core deficit underlying the social, behavioral, and communicative deficits exhibited by individuals with ASD. 1,5 Although to-date questions have arisen regarding the universality and uniqueness of theory-of-mind deficits in autism, and about how this hypothesis could explain early symptoms including restricted interests, or repetitive behaviors, studies repeatedly show reduced performance on tasks that assess ToM in ASD. 6 Thus, ToM is still considered crucial for understanding social performance in ASD. However, the association between language skills (eg, vocabulary and grammar) and performance on ToM tasks in children with ASD raises the possibility that language abilities affect the performance of ToM tasks in children with ASD. 7,8 One way to tease apart the influence of language on ToM abilities is to assess children with ASD and with no language disorder compared to children with language disorder and no ASD. Thus, the present study was aimed to assess ToM abilities in children with ASD whose language is within the norm for their age (ASD-LN) 9,10 compared to children with developmental language disorder (DLD) and typically developing children (TD). ToM is traditionally assessed using false-belief tasks that require children to attribute a false belief to another person to predict his or her behaviour. 11 In one classic false-belief task that involves location change, namely, the "Sally-Anne" task, 1 the doll Sally hid a marble and left the room, and the other doll Ann changed the location of this marble. When Sally returned, the experimenter asked the child "Where will Sally look for her marble?" A correct answer would be to point to the previous location of the marble, suggesting that the child has understood the doll's false belief. An incorrect answer would be to point to the marble's present location, suggesting that the child has not taken the doll's belief into account. 1 In another well-known false-belief task, which involves unexpected content, the "Smarties" task, 12 the child is shown a tube of Smarties and, in contrast to his/her expectation to find sweets inside the tube, he/she found penci -Abstract Truncated-
psychiatry,clinical neurology