Expert opinion paper on cardiac imaging after ischemic stroke

Renate B Schnabel,Stephan Camen,Fabian Knebel,Andreas Hagendorff,Udo Bavendiek,Michael Böhm,Wolfram Doehner,Matthias Endres,Klaus Gröschel,Andreas Goette,Hagen B Huttner,Christoph Jensen,Paulus Kirchhof,Grigorios Korosoglou,Ulrich Laufs,Jan Liman,Caroline Morbach,Darius Günther Nabavi,Tobias Neumann-Haefelin,Waltraud Pfeilschifter,Sven Poli,Timolaos Rizos,Andreas Rolf,Joachim Röther,Wolf Rüdiger Schäbitz,Thorsten Steiner,Götz Thomalla,Rolf Wachter,Karl Georg Haeusler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01834-x
Abstract:This expert opinion paper on cardiac imaging after acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) includes a statement of the "Heart and Brain" consortium of the German Cardiac Society and the German Stroke Society. The Stroke Unit-Commission of the German Stroke Society and the German Atrial Fibrillation NETwork (AFNET) endorsed this paper. Cardiac imaging is a key component of etiological work-up after stroke. Enhanced echocardiographic tools, constantly improving cardiac computer tomography (CT) as well as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offer comprehensive non- or less-invasive cardiac evaluation at the expense of increased costs and/or radiation exposure. Certain imaging findings usually lead to a change in medical secondary stroke prevention or may influence medical treatment. However, there is no proof from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that the choice of the imaging method influences the prognosis of stroke patients. Summarizing present knowledge, the German Heart and Brain consortium proposes an interdisciplinary, staged standard diagnostic scheme for the detection of risk factors of cardio-embolic stroke. This expert opinion paper aims to give practical advice to physicians who are involved in stroke care. In line with the nature of an expert opinion paper, labeling of classes of recommendations is not provided, since many statements are based on expert opinion, reported case series, and clinical experience.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?