CAN PREDATOR TRAPPING IMPROVE WATERFOWL RECRUITMENT IN THE PRAIRIE POTHOLE REGION

F. Rohwer,P. R. Garrettson,Ben J. Mense

Abstract:We contrasted nest success for control areas and experimental areas in eastern North Dakota where we employed professionals to trap mammalian nest predators from late March to late July. In 1995, dabbling ducks averaged 53% nest success on four treatment blocks of 4,150 ha each; whereas on four control areas upland nesting ducks averaged 24% success. Diving duck nest success averaged 57% on experimental areas and 29% on control areas. American coot (Fulica americana ) nest success also improved on experimental areas, but blackbird nesting and fledging success were not affected by the treatment. In 1994, nest success of upland cresting ducks was 52%, which was a striking contrast with upland nest success of 6% on the control area. In 1994 and 1995, brood counts were much higher on the experimental areas than on the control areas. Track counts revealed lower estimates of predator activity on experimental sites compared to control sites. This study provides the first strong experimental documentation that trapping, without the use of poisons, can effectively reduce nest predation and substantially improve waterfowl recruitment. Proc. East. Wildl. Damage Mgmt. Conf. 7:12-22. 1997. (2) loss of upland nesting habitat, and (3) altered predator communities that are detrimental to nesting waterfowl. Problems For Breeding Ducks Loss of wetlands is the most serious problem facing breeding ducks. Without wetlands there can be no waterfowl production. Fortunately, drainage on the U. S. side of the 49th parallel has been greatly reduced through legislation protecting wetlands. Recent programs at state and federal levels have provided incentives to recreate drained wetlands. In prairie Canada, drainage continues, but wetland losses have not approached levels seen in the U.S. The second serious alteration of the prairies has been the conversion of the uplands into agricultural fields. On the northern prairies crop fields do not provide enough cover to adequately conceal nests until very late in the spring. Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and other upland-nesting species are limited to nesting in fragments of cover such as fence lines, pond margins, or roadsides. The shortage of nesting cover is not so severe that it influences nesting effort. Many nests can be packed into the fragments of upland cover not usurped by crop production; unfortunately, concentration of nests in small patches of cover makes them highly susceptible to predators. Most waterfowl management consists of efforts to alter mortality and recruitment rates so populations remain stable and high. Although this idea is simple, the mechanics of manipulating these vital rates, especially population recruitment, are anything but simple, and have been the subject of extensive research (Batt et al. 1992). Vast fluctuations in population levels over time (Caithamer et al. 1995) attest to the difficulties of achieving stable populations. The dramatic population decline of ducks associated with the very dry conditions of the 1980's prompted a reevaluation of waterfowl management. The North American Waterfowl Management Plan (NAWMP) was initiated in 1986 with the goal of setting management priorities and establishing partnerships to tackle some of the larger problems facing waterfowl (NAWMP 1986). The NAWMP assigned top priority to management for duck recruitment, and targeted the Prairie Habitat Joint Venture and the Prairie Pothole Joint Venture. These administrative units are a political split of the U.S. pothole habitats of the Dakotas, Minnesota, and Montana and the Canadian pothole and parkland habitats of Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta. In combination, these regions produce the majority of ducks in North America. The area is united by a triumvirate of problems for waterfowl production: (1) loss of wetlands, The least recognized of the threats to production has been the change in the predator community. Humans have altered both the types of predator and their abundance to the detriment of ducks. The elimination or reduction of large predators and suppression of fire are probably most responsible for the altered predator community. When coyote (Canis latrans populations decline, red fox Vulpes vulpes predominate in the predator community (Sovada et al. 1995). Red fox are serious predators on ducks because they are effective at capturing females on their nests and because they destroy nests by caching eggs (Sergeant et al. 1984, 1993). The second major change in the predator community was the colonization of the prairie region by raccoons roc on lotor (Cowardin et al. 1983, Sanderson 1987). It is unclear whether the lack of large predators, the abundance of trees due to fire suppression, or the availability of anthropogenic food or shelter have been most responsible for the expansion of raccoons. It is clear, however, that raccoons have a very significant impact on duck nest success, especially for the ducks nesting in wetland vegetation, such as canvasbacks (Aythya valisineria and redheads (A. americana (Urban 1970, Stoudt 1982, Johnson et al. 1989). The abundance of medium sized mammals, especially red fox, striped skunk mephitis mephitis , raccoon, and Franklin's ground squirrels (Spermophilus franklinii is probably elevated in portions of the prairie because of the availability of agricultural sunflowers during the critical winter periods. In the late 1970's and early 1980's nest success had declined to rates lower than required for population maintenance for many ducks species (Cowardin et al. 1985, Klett et al. 1988, Beauchamp et al. 1996). It became apparent that there were wetlands that could support breeding pairs, yet the habitat was underutilized (Johnson and Grier 1988). Nest success over much of the prairie region of Canada was below 10% and the overwhelming cause of nest failure was mammalian predation (Greenwood et al. 1987, Sargeant and Raveling 1992). Indirect Management of Predation NAWMP was initiated just as it was becoming clear that nest success was the weak link in production. Accordingly, the majority of management effort was expended on techniques to improve success, especially for upland nesting species such as mallards. The Prairie Habitat Joint Venture, which covers prairie Canada, placed an overwhelming emphasis on the establishment of additional grassland acreage. The hope was that larger (>60 ha) blocks of upland nesting cover would disperse nests and improve success. The most intensive form of grassland management was the purchase of blocks of land to establish dense nesting cover (DNC) (Duebbert et al. 1981). Other programs to increase nesting cover included delayed hay cuts, leases to establish DNC, and incentive programs for pasture improvement via rotational grazing (Barker et al. 1990). Unfortunately, establishment of DNC resulted in only moderate improvements in nest success (Clark and Nudds 1991, Clark et al. 1991). As in unmanaged areas, nest predation is still the primary cause of nest failure on plots of DNC. An alternative to these efforts to conceal nests is management designed to make nests less accessible to predators. In this approach a barrier separates the nest from mammalian predators. Creation of nesting islands in large wetlands, artificial nest structures placed in prairie potholes, and construction of predator exclusion fences around prime nesting habitat all have dramatically improved nest success in at least some situations (Greenwood et al. 1990). Unfortunately, each of these techniques has its drawback. Mallards are the only ducks that routinely use nest structures and use can be highly variable across regions. Islands are expensive to build and can have poor duck nest success if mink (Mustela vison populations are high (Lokemoen 1984). Electric fences are costly and have had limited effects on production due to brood exodus problems (Lokemoen and Woodword 1993, Trottier et al. 1994).