Comparative antigenic phenotypes of normal and leukemic hemopoietic precursor cells analysed with a "library" of monoclonal antibodies.

M. Greaves,J. Robinson,D. Delia,J. Ritz,S. Schlossman,C. Sieff,G. Goldstein,P. Kung,F. Bollum,P. Edwards

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67984-1_51

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Effect of Anti-Vegf Drugs (bevacizumab and Aflibercept) on the Survival of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Mcrc)

Lisong Teng,Xin He,Yang Cui,Jin,Wanlin Li,Jiandong Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ott.s29719

IF: 4

2012-01-01

OncoTargets and Therapy

Abstract:Significant progression has been achieved in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in recent years. This has been partly attributed to successfully incorporating new drugs into combination chemotherapy. In addition to the traditional cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, molecularly targeted agents began to play an important role in the treatment of advanced solid tumors. To date, two classes of molecularly targeted agents have been approved for treatment of patients with mCRC: (1) antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents (such as bevacizumab and aflibercept) and (2) antiendothelial cell growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) agents (such as cetuximab and panitumumab). Aflibercept is a new member of anti-VEGF agents which has demonstrated efficacy for treatment of mCRC. With the commencement of clinical trials and basic research into aflibercept, more data from the bedside and the bench have been obtained. This review will outline the application of anti-VEGF agents by reviewing clinic experiences of bevacizumab and aflibercept, and try to add perspectives on the use of anti-VEGF agents in mCRC. Keywords: chemotherapy, tumors, antiangiogenic
Anti-angiogenic therapy for colorectal cancer: on the way to getting better!

Kuifeng He,Ketao Jin,Haohao Wang,Lisong Teng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5754/hge10722

2012-01-01

Abstract:Based on the theory that tumor growth and metastasis depend on vessels to provide oxygen and nutrients, antiangiogenic therapy was thought as a promising approach to cure cancer: Bevacizumab is the first validated angiogenesis inhibitor, when combined with conventional treatments, which can enhance antitumor effects and prolong survival for patients with colorectal cancer. However, recent years, bevacizumab and other angiogenesis inhibitors are more discussed with drug-resistance and the diverse test results. Fortunately, antiangiogenic strategy is more than bevacizumab and more than anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. Dozens of compounds that potently inhibit neoplastic blood vessels formation with different mechanisms have been developed, and many of them are being tested clinically for colorectal cancer: This review will numerate the principal antiangiogenic drugs with various mechanisms, recapitulate the information of studying these drugs for colorectal cancer treatment and try to clue better usage of antiangiogenic therapy for patients with colorectal cancer in the future.
An observational study of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI beyond progression: the association with RAS mutation and tumor sidedness

Hsiang-Lin Tsai,Ching-Wen Huang,Cheng-Jen Ma,Wei-Chih Su,Tsung-Kun Chang,Po-Jung Chen,Yung-Sung Yeh,Jaw-Yuan Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.09.59

2019-10-01

Translational Cancer Research

Abstract:Background: The BRiTE and ARIES studies suggested that the continued use of bevacizumab beyond progression (BBP) was beneficial. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of the vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFis) bevacizumab and aflibercept as second-line treatments for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed following the application of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. Methods: This observational cohort study (OCS) analyzed the medical records of 73 patients with mCRC divided into a no-VEGFi group (n=48) and a VEGFi group (n=25). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint, and the overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were secondary endpoints. Results: The results revealed that the PFS, ORR, and DCR of the VEGFi group were significantly superior to those of the no-VEGFi group, even in those with wild-type and mutant-type RAS or left-sided mCRC (all P<0.05); however, OS did not differ significantly between the two groups (all P>0.05). Patients with primary left-sided lesions and continued use of VEGFi exhibited the most marked effect on PFS (P=0.001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups (P=0.133). Conclusions: These results support the use of VEGFi as a second-line treatment after bevacizumab beyond the initial progression in this OCS. Bevacizumab or aflibercept combined with second-line chemotherapy in mCRC has an acceptable safety profile and is relatively active. Regardless of the RAS gene type, VEGFi plus FOLOFX6 exhibited superior PFS to that of FLFOX6 as a second-line treatment, and a greater improvement in PFS was obtained for the left-sided lesions than for the right-sided lesions.

oncology
Anti-angiogenic drugs for second-line treatment of NSCLC patients: just new pawns on the chessboard?

Giuseppe Bronte,Francesco Passiglia,Antonio Galvano,Antonio Russo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2015.1075000

2015-08-03

Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy

Abstract:Tumor angiogenesis is one of the main pathways targeted to treat cancer. Bevacizumab added survival benefit when combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC. Recently, Phase III trials showed survival benefit when anti-angiogenic drugs are added to docetaxel as second-line treatment for NSCLC. These anti-angiogenic agents include nintedanib and ramucirumab, a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor and a monoclonal antibody, respectively, which target receptors involved in angiogenesis. These studies have some similarities and differences. We propose a new algorithm for treatment sequences in performance status 0-1 patients with non-oncogene-addicted NSCLC type adenocarcinoma. Indeed clearer scientific evidences are available for this subgroup of patients.

medicine, research & experimental,biotechnology & applied microbiology
Combination of Anti-EGFR and Anti-VEGF Drugs for the Treatment of Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review

Yong Li,Xian Chen,Wenzhu Li,Yongsong Ye,Xiaohua Du,Shaodan Sun,Lirong Liu,Haibo Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.684309

IF: 4.7

2021-05-24

Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract:The standard third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) includes the small-molecule anti-vascular drugs (Regofenib and Fruquintinib) and the chemotherapy drug trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TAS-102). There is no standard treatment for mCRC if the third-line treatment failed. Therefore, it is a pressing need to develop new therapeutic approaches to improve the survival of patients who developed drug resistance to the third-line treatment. In this study, we report a case of mCRC with RAS/BRAF wild-type, who was successfully treated using cetuximab in combination with fruquintinib after resistance to chemotherapy, bevacizumab, cetuximab and regorafenib. This patient responded to this combination regimen. Then, we discuss the mechanisms of action of this combination. Furthermore, we introduce the clinical trials on the combination regimens of anti-EGFR with anti-vascular monoclonal antibodies. Finally, we discuss the clinical explorations of using combination of anti-EGFR with small-molecule anti-VEGF drugs and their potential benefits. The clinical effects of small-molecule anti-vascular drugs in combination with anti-EGFR in the treatment of CRC warrant further explored.

oncology
Plasma Angiogenic Factors as Predictors of the Efficacy of Second-line Chemotherapy Combined with Angiogenesis Inhibitors in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the GI-SCREEN CRC-Ukit Study

Satoshi Yuki,Kentaro Yamazaki,Yu Sunakawa,Hiroya Taniguchi,Hideaki Bando,Manabu Shiozawa,Tomohiro Nishina,Hisateru Yasui,Akiyoshi Kanazawa,Koji Ando,Yosuke Horita,Masahiro Goto,Naohiro Okano,Toshikazu Moriwaki,Taroh Satoh,Akihito Tsuji,Kaname Yamashita,Chiharu Asano,Yukiko Abe,Shogo Nomura,Takayuki Yoshino

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2024.01.003

IF: 4.035

2024-01-21

Clinical Colorectal Cancer

Abstract:Background The significance of angiogenic factors as predictors of second-line (2L) chemotherapy efficacy when combined with angiogenesis inhibitors for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains unestablished. Patients and Methods In this multicenter prospective observational study, 17 angiogenic factors were analyzed in plasma samples collected at pretreatment and progression stages using a Luminex® multiplex assay. Patients who received chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (BEV group), FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab (RAM group), or FOLFIRI plus aflibercept (AFL group) as the 2L treatment were included. Interactions between pretreatment and treatment groups for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rate (RR) were assessed using the propensity-score weighted Cox proportional hazards model. Results From February 2018 to September 2020, 283 patients were analyzed in the 2L cohort. A strong interaction was observed for PFS between BEV and RAM with HGF, sNeuropilin-1, sVEGFR-1, and sVEGFR-3. Interactions for RR between the BEV and RAM groups were observed for sNeuropilin-1 and sVEGFR-1. Contrarily, OS, PlGF, sVEGFR-1, and sVEGFR-3 differentiated the treatment effect between BEV and AFL. Plasma samples were evaluable for dynamic analysis in 203 patients. At progression, VEGF-A levels significantly decreased in the BEV group and increased in the RAM and AFL groups. Conclusion The pretreatment plasma sVEGFR-1 and sVEGFR-3 levels could be predictive biomarkers for distinguishing BEV and RAM when combined with chemotherapy in 2L mCRC treatment. Based on the VEGF-A dynamics at progression, selecting RAM or AFL for patients with significantly elevated VEGF-A levels may be a 2L treatment strategy, with BEV considered for the third-line treatment. Clinical trial number UMIN000028616 Micro We investigated whether plasma angiogenic factors predict the efficacy of antiangiogenic inhibitor combined with chemotherapy in second-line (2L) treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Plasma angiogenic factor dynamics at progression during 2L was also evaluated. Pretreatment plasma sVEGFR-1 and sVEGFR-3 levels might be predictive biomarkers for distinguishing between bevacizumab and ramucirumab when combined with chemotherapy in the 2L treatment of mCRC.

oncology
Advances In Combination Of Antiangiogenic Agents Targeting Vegf-Binding And Conventional Chemotherapy And Radiation For Cancer Treatment

Li-Song Teng,Ke-Tao Jin,Kui-Feng He,Hao-Hao Wang,Jiang Cao,De-Cao Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1726-4901(10)70062-9

2010-01-01

Abstract:Despite great efforts and resources being devoted to treatment, the incidence and mortality of numerous cancers have not decreased in recent decades. This is a result of the resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents and radiotherapy. The development of antiangiogenic agents that target vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) provides a new option for treatment of cancer. Major advances have been achieved with cancer therapy based on antiangiogenic VEGF-targeted agents in the past few years, and some of the recently approved therapies are now being used in daily clinical practice. A further challenge is finding a more efficacious combination of antiangiogenic VEGF-targeted therapies and conventional radio- and chemotherapies. This review outlines the current preclinical and clinical cancer treatments using optimized combinations of antiangiogenic VEGF-targeted agents and conventional radiochemotherapy and highlights that better scheduling for the combination of radiochemotherapy and antiangiogenic VEGF-targeted agents should be developed to achieve better treatment outcomes. [J Chin Med Assoc 2010;73(6):281-288]
Prognostic factors for anti-angiogenic treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: New insights for an old issue from a single institution experience.

Eleonora Lai,Pina Ziranu,Stefano Mariani,Francesco Loi,Enrico Palmas,Alessandra Pia D'Agata,Veronica Dell'Utri,Giulia Deias,Francesca Balconi,Daiana Rizzo,Giulia Papalexis,Claudia Codipietro,Giorgia Sanna,Giusy Moledda,Clelia Donisi,Dario Spanu,Andrea Pretta,Valeria Pusceddu,Marco Puzzoni,Mario Scartozzi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.3_suppl.206

IF: 45.3

2024-01-20

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:206 Background: Anti-angiogenic drugs represent a cornerstone of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treatment. Currently, no prognostic/predictive biomarkers were validated to identify who is more likely to benefit from these agents. We performed at our Centre a retrospective research to assess potential prognostic/predictive factors in this population. Methods: We retrospectively collected laboratory, radiological and clinical data of mCRC pts receiving anti-angiogenic agents at the Medical Oncology Unit of Cagliari University Hospital (2018- 09/2023) in order to assess their correlation with overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) from the treatment start. Statistical analysis was performed with MedCalc (survival distribution: Kaplan-Meier; survival comparison: log-rank test; cut-off: ROC curves). Results: Globally, 32 mCRC pts were included in our research (19 male, 13 female; 12 RAS wild-type, 21 left-sided primary). 10 received anti-angiogenic drugs in the 1st-line, 12 in the 2nd-line (bevacizumab and aflibercept) and 10 in 1st-2nd line. Median OS was 34.8 months (m) (95%CI:24.7-41.6). We observed a statistically significant improve in OS (34.8 months [m] versus [vs] 8.2 m) in pts with higher monocyte count (>0.3x10 3 /μL; 95%CI 26.5-39.5 vs 95%CI 8.2-24.7, p=0.0103, HR 0.01), lower alcalin phosphatase (ALP; <136 U/l; p=0.0001, HR=0.0001; 95%CI 12-39.5 vs 95% CI 8.2-10.4), lactate dehydrogenasis (LDH; <365 U/l; p<0,0001, HR=0.0000006; 95%CI 24.7-39.5 vs 95% CI 8.2-10.4) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR; ≤253; p<0.0001, HR= 0.00000062; 95%CI 24.7-39.5 vs 95% CI 8.2-10.4). Median PFS was 14.9 m (95% CI 9.5-18.5). The same factors were significantly related to PFS, which was 18.3 m vs 2.7 m for higher monocyte count (95%CI 11.4-22.1 vs 95%CI 2.7-14, p=0.0386, HR=0.05), lower LDH (95%CI 11.4-22.1 vs 95%CI 2.7-8.9, p=0.0024, HR=0.004), lower PLR (95%CI 11.4-22.1 vs 95%CI 2.7-8.9, p=0.0024, HR=0.004) and 18.3 m vs 8.9 m for lower ALP (95%CI 11.4-23.3, p=0.0369, HR=0.04). Furthermore pts not developing bleeding during treatment showed a significant benefit in OS (39.5 m [95%CI 26.5-41.6] vs 8.2 m [95%CI 8.2-12], p< 0.0001, HR 0.000001761) and improved PFS (17.9 m [95%CI 9.9-18.4] vs 2.4 m [95%CI 2.4-2.7]; p<0.0001). Conclusions: Our findings showed a promising prognostic role of baseline monocytes, ALP, LDH and PLR and absence of bleeding occurrence in mCRC patients receiving anti-angiogenic drugs, even if in a limited population. Further larger prospective studies are encouraged for confirmation.

oncology
Anti-Angiogenics: Their Value in Lung Cancer Therapy

Melanie Janning,Sonja Loges

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000488119

2018-01-01

Oncology Research and Treatment

Abstract:Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Different targeted therapies and the introduction of immunotherapy have successfully improved outcome for patients with non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). Anti-angiogenic drugs are an essential component in the treatment of NSCLC patients. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A antibody bevacizumab is approved for first-line treatment of advanced-stage patients in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. Ramucirumab, a VEGF receptor antibody, and nintedanib, an anti-angiogenic multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, are approved for second-line treatment in combination with docetaxel. This review provides a summary of pivotal trials with anti-angiogenic drugs in NSCLC in different settings. We give an overview of how to position anti-angiogenic therapy in the current treatment algorithms and highlight future directions. The identification of predictive biomarkers for patient selection could improve the success of anti-angiogenic drugs and represents an important area of research. In addition, novel therapeutic targets including endothelial metabolomic intermediates and cellular components of the tumor microenvironment could lead to the identification of innovative new targets besides the VEGF axis.

oncology
The Role of Anti-angiogenesis in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: an Update

Liza C. Villaruz,Mark A. Socinski

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-015-0448-y

2015-05-07

Current Oncology Reports

Abstract:Recognition of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway as a key mediator of angiogenesis has led to the clinical study of several VEGF and VEGF receptor (VEGFR) targeted therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These targeted therapies include neutralizing antibodies to VEGF (bevacizumab and aflibercept) and VEGFR-2 (ramucirumab) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with selectivity for the VEGFRs. Bevacizumab and ramucirumab are associated with survival advantages in the treatment of advanced NSCLC: bevacizumab in the first-line setting in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel and ramucirumab in combination with docetaxel in the second-line setting. The VEGFR-2 TKIs have been associated with responses and improved progression-free survival in selected NSCLC settings; however, this level of activity has thus far been insufficient to confer significant survival advantages. This review will focus on the current state of VEGF targeted therapies in NSCLC.

oncology
Efficacy and safety of third-line or later-line targeted treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Wen-Hui Xue,Xue-Wei Li,Ya-Qian Ding,Na Wu,Bei-Bei Pei,Xiao-Yan Ma,Jun Xie,Wen-Hui Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1165040

IF: 4.7

2023-06-01

Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract:Targeted therapy has been standardized in front-line therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), while explicit recommendations for third- or later-line are still lacking. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining targeted therapy with chemotherapy in the third- or later-line treatment for mCRC via meta-analysis, providing evidence-based guidance for clinical or research practice. Comprehensive retrieval of related studies was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline. Studies were stratified with patient characteristics and pharmacological classification of the drugs. For the data available for quantitative analysis, pooled overall response rate, disease control rate, hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events rate with respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A total of 22 studies (1,866 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Data from 17 studies (1,769 patients) involving targets of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were extracted for meta-analyses. The overall response rates for monotherapy and combined therapy were 4% (95% CI: 3%, 5%) and 20% (95% CI: 11%, 29%). The pooled HRs (combined therapy vs. mono) for OS and PFS were 0.72 (95% CI: 0.53, 0.99) and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.45). Another five studies were included in narrative depiction, involving targets of BRAF, HER-2, ROS1, and NTRK. The findings of this meta-analysis indicate that VEGF and EGFR inhibitors manifest promising clinical response rates and prolonged survival in the treatment of mCRC with acceptable adverse events.

oncology
Anti-angiogenic agents for NSCLC following first-line immunotherapy: Rationale, recent updates, and future perspectives

Martin Reck,Sanjay Popat,Sanjay Popat,Christian Grohé,Jesus Corral,Silvia Novello,Maya Gottfried,Wolfgang Brueckl,Dejan Radonjic,Rolf Kaiser,Rolf Kaiser,John Heymach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.03.009

IF: 6.081

2023-05-01

Lung Cancer

Abstract:The implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with or without chemotherapy, as first-line treatment for patients who do not have actionable mutations has proved to be a major paradigm shift in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the transition of ICIs, such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, to a first-line setting has left an unmet need for effective second-line treatment options, which is an area of intense research. In 2020, we reviewed the biological and mechanistic rationale for anti-angiogenic agents in combination with, or following, immunotherapy with the aim of eliciting a so called ‘angio-immunogenic’ switch in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we review the latest clinical evidence of the benefits of incorporating anti-angiogenic agents into treatment regimens. While there is a paucity of prospective data, several recent observational studies indicate that the marketed anti-angiogenic drugs, nintedanib or ramucirumab, are effective in combination with docetaxel following immuno-chemotherapy. Addition of anti-angiogenics, like bevacizumab, have also demonstrated clinical benefit when combined with first-line immuno-chemotherapy regimens. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing these agents in combination with ICIs, with encouraging early results (e.g., ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab in LUNG-MAP S1800A). Also, several emerging anti-angiogenic agents combined with ICIs are currently being assessed in phase III trials following immunotherapy, including lenvatinib (LEAP-008), and sitravatinib (SAPPHIRE) It is hoped that these trials will help expand second-line treatment options in patients with NSCLC. Areas of focus in the future will include further molecular dissection of the mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy and the various response–progression profiles to immunotherapy observed in the clinic and the monitoring of the dynamics of immunomodulation over the course of treatment. Improved understanding of these phenomena may help identify clinical biomarkers and inform the optimal use of anti-angiogenics in the treatment of individual patients.

oncology,respiratory system
First-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors Plus Antiangiogenic Drugs Versus Third-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Mirta Mosca,Nicole Conci,Alessandro Di Federico,Valentina Tateo,Valentina Favorito,Arianna Zappi,Francesco Gelsomino,Andrea De Giglio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.23.00073

Abstract:Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, despite significant survival improvement, the emergence of resistance mechanisms represents a common event. In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of third-generation EGFR-TKIs, the current standard of care, to first-generation EGFR-TKIs with antiangiogenic drugs for the first-line treatment of NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. Materials and methods: Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) reporting survival data published before September 1, 2022, were searched through the MEDLINE databases (PubMed), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (≥3 TRAEs) data were analyzed. Results: Twelve RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, with a total of 3,565 patients. We observed that third-generation EGFR-TKIs and first-generation EGFR-TKIs combined with antiangiogenic drugs provided a similar OS benefit over first-generation EGFR-TKIs in any of the subgroups. However, we indirectly observed a greater PFS benefit of third-generation EGFR-TKIs over first-generation EGFR-TKIs in females, never-smokers, in patients harboring exon 19 deletions, and in those with brain metastasis, as compared with using first-generation EGFR-TKIs plus antiangiogenic drugs. The ORR did not differ between the combination strategy and third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Finally, the risk of developing grade ≥3 TRAEs was higher using the combination of first-generation EGFR-TKIs and antiangiogenic drugs over first-generation EGFR-TKIs than third-generation EGFR-TKIs over first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that the combination strategy may provide an alternative to third-generation EGFR-TKIs, but more data are needed to determine the predictive clinicopathologic characteristics that can influence the treatment choice. Until then, third-generation EGFR-TKIs still represent the first choice in advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.
A preclinical and clinical review of aflibercept for the management of cancer

Andrew Gaya,Vivien Tse

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.12.008

Abstract:Aflibercept, also known as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-Trap, is a recombinant, decoy receptor fusion protein, rationally designed to block angiogenesis by targeting not only all forms of VEGF-A, but also VEGF-B and placental growth factor. It inhibits VEGF-induced angiogenesis in preclinical models. In tumor models, aflibercept is associated with the reduction of tumor vasculature and size, and the inhibition of ascites formation. Clinical studies are investigating the use of aflibercept alone and in combination with other antineoplastic therapies for the treatment of various cancers. Phase I and II studies have provided proof of principle, and support the continuing clinical investigation of aflibercept. Results from the phase III study, VITAL, of aflibercept in the second-line setting in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer [NCT00532155] demonstrated efficacy in progression-free survival and overall objective response rate, but overall survival was not significantly improved. A full report awaits publication. The Phase III VANILLA trial in metastatic pancreatic cancer [NCT00574275] showed no improvement in overall survival. Most recently, the phase III VELOUR study [NCT00561470] of aflibercept plus FOLFIRI compared with placebo plus FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer following failure of an oxaliplatin regimen showed significant improvements in overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate and the complete results have been submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. This review summarizes preclinical and clinical data for aflibercept and discusses future directions and clinical trials for this agent.
Anti-angiogenesis revisited: reshaping the treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Sun Ha Choi,Seung Soo Yoo,Shin Yup Lee,Jae Yong Park

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-022-01382-6

2022-04-21

Archives of Pharmacal Research

Abstract:Although anti-angiogenic agents have been of limited use in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) until recently, further roles for the use of angiogenesis inhibition have emerged in the era of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockade. Given the shared common downstream signals of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with their complementary roles in tumorigenesis and tumor angiogenesis, the dual inhibition of EGFR and VEGF pathways represents a rational strategy to maximize clinical efficacy and overcome resistance in the treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. VEGF-driven angiogenesis is a potent driver of immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), with the recruited immunosuppressive cells driving angiogenesis, highlighting the interplay between the tumor vasculature and the anticancer immunity. Anti-angiogenic therapy can normalize the tumor vasculature and reprogram the TME from immunosuppressive into immunosupportive. Intensive research is under way to utilize the anti-angiogenic combination therapy to its full potential in diverse clinical settings in urgent unmet needs for the treatment of NSCLC. In this review, we present an overview of tumor angiogenesis and summarize the scientific background and preclinical and clinical evidence of anti-angiogenic therapy in combination with target therapy and immunotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC.

pharmacology & pharmacy,chemistry, medicinal
Anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF agents: important targeted therapies of colorectal liver metastases.

Qing-Yang Feng,Ye Wei,Jing-Wen Chen,Wen-Ju Chang,Le-Chi Ye,De-Xiang Zhu,Jian-Min Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4263

IF: 5.374

2014-01-01

World Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract:Colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) is common worldwide. Targeted therapies with monoclonal antibodies have been proven effective in numerous clinical trials, and are now becoming standards for patients with CLM. The development and application of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) antibodies represents significant advances in the treatment of this disease. However, new findings continue to emerge casting doubt on the efficacy of this approach. The Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) has been proven to be a crucial predictor of the success of anti-EGFR treatment in CLM. Whereas a recent study summarized several randomized controlled trials, and showed that patients with the KRAS G13D mutation significantly benefited from the addition of cetuximab in terms of progress-free survival (PFS, 4.0 mo vs 1.9 mo, HR = 0.51, P = 0.004) and overall survival (OS, 7.6 mo vs 5.7 mo, HR = 0.50, P = 0.005). Some other studies also reported that the KRAS G13D mutation might not be absolutely predictive of non-responsiveness to anti-EGFR therapy. At the same time, "new" RAS mutations, including mutations in neuroblastoma RAS viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog (NRAS) and exons 3 and 4 of KRAS, have been suggested to be predictors of a poor treatment response. This finding was first reported by the update of the PRIME trial. The update showed that for patients with non-mutated KRAS exon 2 but other RAS mutations, panitumumab-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) 4 treatment led to inferior PFS (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.79-2.07) and OS (HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.79-2.10), which was consistent with the findings in patients with KRAS mutations in exon 2. Then, the update of the PEAK trial and the FIRE-III trial also supported this finding, which would reduce candidates for anti-EGFR therapy but enhance the efficacy. In first-line targeted combination therapy, the regimens of cetuximab plus FOLFOX was called into question because of the inferior prognosis in the COIN trial and the NORDIC-IV trial. Also, bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was questioned because of the NO16966 trial. By the update and further analysis of the COIN trial and the NORDIC-VII trial, cetuximab plus FOLFOX was reported to be reliable again. But bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was still controversial. In addition, some trials have reported that bevacizumab is not suitable for conversion therapy. The results of the FIRE-III trial showed that cetuximab led to a significant advantage over bevacizumab in response rate (72% vs 63%, P = 0.017) for evaluable population. With the balanced allocation of second-line treatment, the FIRE. trial was expected to provide evidence for selecting following regimens after first-line progression. There is still no strong evidence for the efficacy of targeted therapy as a preoperative treatment for resectable CLM or postoperative treatment for resected CLM, although the combined regimen is often administered based on experience. Combination therapy with more than one targeted agent has been proven to provide no benefit, and even was reported to be harmful as first-line treatment by four large clinical trials. However, recent studies reported positive results of erlotinib plus bevacizumab for maintenance treatment. The mechanism of antagonism between different targeted agents deserves further study, and may also provide greater understanding of the development of resistance to targeted agents. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
The Potential of Antiangiogenic Therapy in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Giuseppe Giaccone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-2186

IF: 13.801

2007-04-01

Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract:The long-term prognosis for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor despite the availability of several cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. The use of targeted therapies, particularly those against the key mediator of angiogenesis vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has the potential to improve outcomes for NSCLC patients. Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody, is the most clinically advanced antiangiogenic agent in NSCLC. In a phase III study, bevacizumab showed significantly improved overall and progression-free survival when used in combination with standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Bevacizumab was generally well tolerated in patients with NSCLC; however, tumor-related bleeding adverse events have been noted in some patients, predominantly those with squamous cell histology or centrally located tumors. Several small-molecule VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors have also shown promise in phase I and II trials in NSCLC. This review summarizes the most important findings of angiogenesis inhibitors in NSCLC and discusses the potential for the use of these novel agents in different settings of NSCLC.

oncology
Blood Vessel-Targeted Therapy in Colorectal Cancer: Current Strategies and Future Perspectives

Anne Jacobsen,Jürgen Siebler,Robert Grützmann,Michael Stürzl,Elisabeth Naschberger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16050890

2024-02-23

Cancers

Abstract:The vasculature is a key player and regulatory component in the multicellular microenvironment of solid tumors and, consequently, a therapeutic target. In colorectal carcinoma (CRC), antiangiogenic treatment was approved almost 20 years ago, but there are still no valid predictors of response. In addition, treatment resistance has become a problem. Vascular heterogeneity and plasticity due to species-, organ-, and milieu-dependent phenotypic and functional differences of blood vascular cells reduced the hope of being able to apply a standard approach of antiangiogenic therapy to all patients. In addition, the pathological vasculature in CRC is characterized by heterogeneous perfusion, impaired barrier function, immunosuppressive endothelial cell anergy, and metabolic competition-induced microenvironmental stress. Only recently, angiocrine proteins have been identified that are specifically released from vascular cells and can regulate tumor initiation and progression in an autocrine and paracrine manner. In this review, we summarize the history and current strategies for applying antiangiogenic treatment and discuss the associated challenges and opportunities, including normalizing the tumor vasculature, modulating milieu-dependent vascular heterogeneity, and targeting functions of angiocrine proteins. These new strategies could open perspectives for future vascular-targeted and patient-tailored therapy selection in CRC.

oncology
[Anti-angiogenic factors in thoracic oncology: successes, failures and prospects]

S Marco,P Tomasini,L Greillier,F Barlesi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmr.2011.04.014

Abstract:Many growth factors involved in tumor angiogenesis are potential targets in thoracic oncology. This work is a review of the literature on the effectiveness of anti-angiogenic treatments in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and malignant pleural mesothelioma (MM). Thirty-four articles and 15 abstracts were identified. Currently, bevacizumab is the only drug that has demonstrated an impact on overall survival in first line treatment for stage IV non-squamous NSCLC, but VEGFR-TKI such as cediranib, aflibercept, vandetanib, pazopanib have shown encouraging results in phase II or III clinical trials. In extensive-disease SCLC and inoperable MM, bevacizumab is the most studied molecule, but again, clinical trials are still ongoing. Current data on potential predictors for efficacy are disappointing, but some biomarkers or radiological techniques might be useful for guiding the use of anti-angiogenic therapies in the future. In conclusion, bevacizumab is the most studied anti-angiogenic agent in thoracic oncology. It is the only approved drug with an indication in first-line and maintenance treatment for stage IV non-squamous NSCLC. The indications for the use of VEGFR-TKI in clinical practice remain to be defined.
Emerging angiogenesis inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer

Umberto Malapelle,Antonio Rossi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14728214.2019.1619696

2019-04-03

Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs

Abstract:Introduction: Angiogenesis represents a complex process crucial during embryo development, wound healing, and collateral formation for improved organ perfusion. Numerous stimulatory and inhibitory pathways through their balance regulate angiogenesis and vascular homeostasis. Targeting the pathways implicated in the regulation of angiogenesis and neo-angiogenesis plays an important role in cancer research, treatment, and patients' outcome. Antiangiogenic strategies, including monoclonal antibodies binding vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or the corresponding receptor and small molecules which inhibit the function of different angio–related tyrosine kinase, produced interesting results in cancer treatments including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Areas covered: The current state-of-the-art of anti-angiogenesis treatment in the management of NSCLC patients is reviewed and discussed. A structured search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature and of main meetings using a focused review question was undertaken in order to discuss about emerging angiogenesis inhibitors in NSCLC.Expert opinion: Targeting angiogenesis remains an important therapeutic strategy in the management of NSCLC. Moreover, VEGF has been recognized having also an immunosuppressive action leading to investigate the potential activity of angiogenic inhibitors in restoring the antitumor immunity by targeting VEGF/VEGF-Receptor. Furthermore, new anti-angiogenic drugs for which there is also the availability of predictive biomarkers are welcome.

pharmacology & pharmacy

Comparative antigenic phenotypes of normal and leukemic hemopoietic precursor cells analysed with a "library" of monoclonal antibodies.

The Effect of Anti-Vegf Drugs (bevacizumab and Aflibercept) on the Survival of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Mcrc)

Anti-angiogenic therapy for colorectal cancer: on the way to getting better!

An observational study of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI beyond progression: the association with RAS mutation and tumor sidedness

Anti-angiogenic drugs for second-line treatment of NSCLC patients: just new pawns on the chessboard?

Combination of Anti-EGFR and Anti-VEGF Drugs for the Treatment of Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review

Plasma Angiogenic Factors as Predictors of the Efficacy of Second-line Chemotherapy Combined with Angiogenesis Inhibitors in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the GI-SCREEN CRC-Ukit Study

Advances In Combination Of Antiangiogenic Agents Targeting Vegf-Binding And Conventional Chemotherapy And Radiation For Cancer Treatment

Prognostic factors for anti-angiogenic treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: New insights for an old issue from a single institution experience.

Anti-Angiogenics: Their Value in Lung Cancer Therapy

The Role of Anti-angiogenesis in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: an Update

Efficacy and safety of third-line or later-line targeted treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Anti-angiogenic agents for NSCLC following first-line immunotherapy: Rationale, recent updates, and future perspectives

First-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors Plus Antiangiogenic Drugs Versus Third-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

A preclinical and clinical review of aflibercept for the management of cancer

Anti-angiogenesis revisited: reshaping the treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF agents: important targeted therapies of colorectal liver metastases.

The Potential of Antiangiogenic Therapy in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Blood Vessel-Targeted Therapy in Colorectal Cancer: Current Strategies and Future Perspectives

[Anti-angiogenic factors in thoracic oncology: successes, failures and prospects]

Emerging angiogenesis inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer