Assessment of renal perfusion: advocacy for Doppler ultrasonography.

M. Bensalah,Laetitia Franck,Cécil Astaud,L. Domanski,J. Tourtier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825bc988
IF: 8.8
2012-10-01
Critical Care Medicine
Abstract:to the editor: We read with great interest the article by Prowle and colleagues (1) concerning measurement of renal blood flow (RBF) by phase-contrast magnetic imaging during septic acute kidney injury. This analysis appears as a new way to approach optimal systemic hemodynamics required for renal perfusion in septic critically ill patients. Authors mentioned that logistic difficulties of access to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in unstable patients are likely to prevent this technique being applied to the full time-course of septic acute renal injury in humans. Furthermore, contraindications to magnetic resonance examination prevent this technique being safely used to study numerous cardiac patients with acute kidney injury. Also, we want to go further into discussion and expose the interest of noninvasive Doppler ultrasound in analysis of renal perfusion. Essential measures concerning RBF and important informations are given by Doppler ultrasound. Doppler ultrasonography allows us to analyze both RBF variations and resistances, using velocity of RBF and the pulsatility of blood flow waveform. Renal vascular resistance may represent a key hemodynamic factor that is involved in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (2). Interestingly, the increase of renal artery resistances in early time of septic shock has been shown to be associated with acute renal failure by day 5 (3). In daily practice in intensive care units, one of the main interest of Doppler ultrasound seems to be its facility of access, contrasting with MRI. Doppler ultrasound is practicable by physician taught to ultrasonography in intensive care unit, even for patients with hemodynamic instability. As phase-contrast MRI, Doppler ultrasound is a noninvasive exam, but without contraindication, which is often an important consideration in critical ill patients. Furthermore, Doppler ultrasonography is cheaper than MRI, and is easily repeatable during the full time-course of septic patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?