A Comparison of Maxillofacial and Head Injuries Following Electric Scooter and Bicycle Accidents
Brian Bhaskar,Joshua Alumbaugh,Zhehao Zhang,Jasjit Dillon,Andrea Burke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2024.03.011
IF: 1.9
2024-03-21
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Abstract:Background The prevalence of maxillofacial and head injuries associated with electric scooters (e-scooter, ES) has risen in concordance with its popularity. Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare maxillofacial and head injury location, type, and severity related to e-scooter and bicycle accidents and to identify factors contributing to injury severity. Study design, setting, sample The authors implemented a multi-center retrospective cohort study in Seattle, Washington and enrolled a sample of ES riders and bicyclists who sustained maxillofacial injuries between September 2020 and September 2022. Exclusion criteria included non-motorized scooters, motorized bicycles, injuries with other operators or vehicles, and pre-evaluation deaths. Predictor variable The predictor variable was vehicle type, bicycle / ES. Outcome variables The outcome variables included maxillofacial injury location, distinguished by horizontal facial thirds, and injury type, defined as hard or soft tissue. Associated head injury type was also reported as hard (calvaria) or soft (scalp) tissue injuries. Severity of these injuries was quantified using both the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Face and Head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). Covariates Demographic, injury, and treatment-related variables were collected. Analyses Bivariate, multivariate, and regression statistics were computed. Statistical significance was P < 0.05. Results The final sample was composed of 205 total subjects, of which 52 (25.4%) were in the ES group and 153 (74.6%) in the bicycle group. Isolated midface injuries were the most common hard tissue location in the ES (15.4%) and bicycle (29.4%) groups. The most common soft tissue injury location included the upper face and midface in the ES (19.2%) and the midface in bicycle groups (22.9%). Both hard and soft tissue head injuries were more prevalent in the ES group (p<0.0002 and p<0.0001). Moreover, intracranial injuries were seen in 36.5% of ES subjects compared to 9.8% bicycle subjects (p<0.0001). Between the two groups there was no difference in maxillofacial injury severity, but head injuries were more severe in the ES group (p < 0.0002). Using regression analysis, drug use was found to have a significant impact on the mean Injury Severity Score (p < 0.002) and helmet use did not have significant impact on face or head injury severity. Conclusion Maxillofacial injury location, type, and severity are comparable among ES and bicycles. However, ES riders are at greater risk of severe head injuries compared to bicycles and riding while intoxicated has the greatest effect on injury severity.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine