Abstract:In order to gain economic benefits,media fiequently make lots of unconfirmed negative news regarding the rumors about firms and consequently induce media bias through spreading rumors.However,previous scholars conduct dramatic researches about the positive role of media in corporate governance,but ignore the study on how to restrict media bias.Therefore,in regard to the media bias subsequently following the exposure of negative rumors about a Chinese listed firm,we consider whether corporate clarification announcements can restrict media bias.Based on the prior research,we explore the impact of corporate clarification announcements on media bias from the risk-aversion perspective of journalists,and the profit-driven perspective of news agencies.From the risk-aversion perspective,prior research demonstrates that media bias may influence media reputation and their income,as well as cause unnecessary litigation risks.Consequently,we propose that corporate clarification announcements can restrict media bias.If the quality of clarification announcements is stronger,the magnitude of media bias will decrease more (Hypothesis la).Moreover,the Agenda Setting Theory proposes that media can influence how the large public thinks about the firms.From the perspective of news agencies' profit-driven motivation,the news agencies have the incentive to make more negative reports regarding the firm being targeted by rumors because negative news attract more public attention.Consequently,we hypothesize that corporate clarification announcements could not restrict media bias (Hypothesis Meanwhile,among state-owned finns,their clarification announcements indicate the attitude of the government toward the rumors.If media continue to report the focal firms negatively,they will risk their relationship with government.Consequently,we propose that if the administrative rank of listed companies is higher,their clarification announcements would more effectively restrict media bias (Hypothesis 2).We collect the samples of rumors at Chinese A-share listed companies from 2006 to 2012.The regression results support that corporate clarification announcements can restrict media bias (supporting Hypothesis la).The higher the administrative rank of listed companies,the better the restricting effectiveness is (supporting Hypothesis 2).Our research relaxes the assumption that media report is unbiased,and explores the influence of corporate reaction on media reports from the perspective of restricting media bias.The empirical results support that corporate clarification announcements would rectify media bias.The results would instruct the firms on how to effectively deal with media bias subsequently following rumors.

Silence is golden? Responses to rumors by Chinese listed firms

How Rumors Fly

The Market Reaction on Clarification Announcements: The Role of Listed Companies' Rumors Response Factors

Good Deeds Done in Silence: Stakeholder Management and Quiet Giving by Chinese Firms

With a Grain of Salt: Uncertain Veracity of External News and Firm Disclosures

Can corporate clarification restrict media rumors:Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies

Corporate Risk-Taking, Opportunistic Earnings Management and Information Opacity: Evidence from China

Panda Games: Corporate Disclosure in the Eclipse of Search

Can Rumor Clarification Eliminate the Effects of Rumors? Evidence From China

The Kind of Silence: Managing a Reputation for Voluntary Disclosure in Financial Markets

Do Chinese managers listen to the media?: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions

Corruption Crackdown and Firm News Sentiment

No Signal is Bad Signal: Analyst Silence after On-Site Visit

Research on the effect of corporate rumor clarification based on text analysis

Aggressive reporting, investor protection and stock price informativeness: Evidence from Chinese firms

Stock Market Reactions to Environmental Disclosures: New Evidence from China

Evidence of Trading on Inside Information in China

Is Corporate Social Responsibility Used To Mask Corporate Speculation? Evidence From Emerging China

Firm Responses to Nonprescriptive Pollution Regulation: Evidence from China’s Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Mandate

To protect or to hide-an investigation on corporate redacted disclosure motives under new FAST act regulation

Is silence golden in political workplace? The dual effects of silence on career success in China