The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS). Hierarchical scaling and biasing

A. Cappi,F. Marulli,J. Bel,O. Cucciati,E. Branchini,S. de la Torre,L. Moscardini,M. Bolzonella,L. Guzzo,U. Abbas,C. Adami,S. Arnouts,D. Bottini,J. Coupon,I. Davidzon,G. De Lucia,A. Fritz,P. Franzetti,M. Fumana,B. Garilli,B. R. Granett,O. Ilbert,A. Iovino,J. Krywult,V. Le Brun,O. Le Fèvre,D. Maccagni,K. Małek,H. J. McCracken,L. Paioro,M. Polletta,A. Pollo,M. Scodeggio,L. A. . M. Tasca,R. Tojeiro,D. Vergani,A. Zanichelli,A. Burden,C. Di Porto,A. Marchetti,C. Marinoni,Y. Mellier,R. C. Nichol,J. A. Peacock,W. J. Percival,S. Phleps,C. Schimd,H. Schlagenhaufer,M. Wolk,G. Zamorani,L. A. .M. Tasca

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1505.05347

2015-05-20

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Abstract:We investigate the higher-order correlation properties of the VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS) to test the hierarchical scaling hypothesis at z~1 and the dependence on galaxy luminosity, stellar mass, and redshift. We also aim to assess deviations from the linearity of galaxy bias independently from a previously performed analysis of our survey (Di Porto et al. 2014). We have measured the count probability distribution function in cells of radii 3 < R < 10 Mpc/h, deriving $\sigma_{8g}$, the volume-averaged two-,three-,and four-point correlation functions and the normalized skewness $S_{3g}$ and kurtosis $S_{4g}$ for volume-limited subsamples covering the ranges $-19.5 \le M_B(z=1.1)-5log(h) \le -21.0$, $9.0 < log(M*/M_{\odot} h^{-2}) \le 11.0$, $0.5 \le z < 1.1$. We have thus performed the first measurement of high-order correlations at z~1 in a spectroscopic redshift survey. Our main results are the following. 1) The hierarchical scaling holds throughout the whole range of scale and z. 2) We do not find a significant dependence of $S_{3g}$ on luminosity (below z=0.9 $S_{3g}$ decreases with luminosity but only at 1{\sigma}-level). 3) We do not detect a significant dependence of $S_{3g}$ and $S_{4g}$ on scale, except beyond z~0.9, where the dependence can be explained as a consequence of sample variance. 4) We do not detect an evolution of $S_{3g}$ and $S_{4g}$ with z. 5) The linear bias factor $b=\sigma_{8g}/\sigma_{8m}$ increases with z, in agreement with previous results. 6) We quantify deviations from the linear bias by means of the Taylor expansion parameter $b_2$. Our results are compatible with a null non-linear bias term, but taking into account other available data we argue that there is evidence for a small non-linear bias term.