Protective action in the workplace in the time of COVID‐19: The role of worker representation

Laia Ollé‐Espluga,Raúl Payá Castiblanque,Clara Llorens‐Serrano,Laura Esteve‐Matalí,Albert Navarro‐Giné
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23578
2024-03-09
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Abstract:Background This study addresses the contribution of worker representation to health and safety in the pandemic context. To do so, we examine whether the self‐reported presence of representatives in workplaces is associated with the implementation of anti‐COVID‐19 protective action and with which type of measures their existence is most strongly associated (individual, collective or organizational). The article also explores how the presence of worker representatives and anti‐COVID‐19 protective measures are distributed according to workers' socio‐professional characteristics and company features. Methods This is a cross‐sectional study based on an online survey conducted in Spain (n = 19,452 workers). Multiple Correspondence Analysis was used for the multivariate description while the association between worker representation and protective measures was assessed by robust Poisson regressions. Results The maps resulting from the Multiple Correspondence Analysis allow for the identification of patterns of inequalities in protection, with a clear occupational social class divide. The regression models show that protective measures are applied more frequently where worker representatives exist, this association being particularly strong in relation to organizational measures. Conclusions The presence of worker representation is systematically associated with a greater presence of protective measures, which could have implications for the reduction of social inequalities resulting from labor‐management practices.
public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?