Prognostic implications of body composition change during primary treatment in patients with ovarian cancer: A retrospective study using an artificial intelligence-based volumetric technique

Se Ik Kim,Soonho Yoon,Taek Min Kim,Jeong Yeon Cho,Hyun Hoon Chung,Yong Sang Song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.004
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the impact of changes in body composition during primary treatment on survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: We retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with EOC between 2010 and 2019. Using an artificial intelligence-based tool, the volumes of skeletal muscle, visceral fat, and subcutaneous fat were measured automatically at the waist level from pre-treatment and post-treatment computed tomography scans. Associations between changes in body mass index (BMI) and volume of each body composition component and survival outcomes were evaluated. Results: A total of 208 patients were included. A significant decrease in BMI and waist volumes of skeletal muscle and visceral fat was observed during the primary treatment. Patients with BMI loss ≥5% showed significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with BMI loss <5%. In multivariate analyses adjusting for clinicopathologic factors, BMI loss ≥5% was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for PFS (adjusted HR, 1.565; 95% CI, 1.074-2.280; P = 0.020) and OS (adjusted HR, 2.754; 95% CI, 1.382-5.488; P = 0.004). Meanwhile, both muscle loss ≥10% and visceral fat loss ≥20% were associated with an increased mortality rate but did not affect disease recurrence. In multivariate analyses, muscle loss ≥10% (adjusted HR, 2.069; 95% CI, 1.055-4.058; P = 0.034) and visceral fat loss ≥20% (adjusted HR, 2.292; 95% CI, 1.023-5.133; P = 0.044) were poor prognostic factors for OS. Consistent results were observed in the advanced-stage disease subgroup (n = 173). Conclusions: Changes in BMI and waist volume of skeletal muscle and visceral fat were associated with survival outcomes in patients with EOC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?