Comparing the Impact of Three-Dimensional Digital Visualization Technology Versus Traditional Microscopy on Microsurgeons in Microsurgery: a Prospective Self-Controlled Study.
Andi Xu,Ying Yao,Wenben Chen,Yuanfan Lin,Ruiyang Li,Ruixin Wang,Liuqing Pan,Qingqing Ye,Yangfei Pang,Xiaohang Wu,Duoru Lin,Lanqin Zhao,Ling Jin,Hang Shao,Wei Liu,Kun Gao,Xin Zhang,Pisong Yan,Xinpei Deng,Dongni Wang,Weiming Huang,Xulin Zhang,Meimei Dongye,Jinrong Li,Haotian Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000000950
2024-01-01
International Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Background: Emerging three-dimensional digital visualization technology (DVT) provides more advantages than traditional microscopy in microsurgery; however, its impact on microsurgeons' visual and nervous systems and delicate microsurgery is still unclear, which hinders the wider implementation of DVT in digital visualization for microsurgery. Methods and material: Forty-two microsurgeons from the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center were enrolled in this prospective self-controlled study. Each microsurgeon consecutively performed 30 min conjunctival sutures using a three-dimensional digital display and a microscope, respectively. Visual function, autonomic nerve activity, and subjective symptoms were evaluated before and immediately after the operation. Visual functions, including accommodative lag, accommodative amplitude, near point of convergence and contrast sensitivity function (CSF), were measured by an expert optometrist. Heart rate variability was recorded by a wearable device for monitoring autonomic nervous activity. Subjective symptoms were evaluated by questionnaires. Microsurgical performance was assessed by the video-based Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) tool. Results: Accommodative lag decreased from 0.63 (0.18) diopters (D) to 0.55 (0.16) D (P=0.014), area under the log contrast sensitivity function increased from 1.49 (0.15) to 1.52 (0.14) (P=0.037), and heart rate variability decreased from 36.00 (13.54) milliseconds (ms) to 32.26 (12.35) ms (P=0.004) after using the DVT, but the changes showed no differences compared to traditional microscopy (P>0.05). No statistical significance was observed for global OSATS scores between the two rounds of operations [mean difference, 0.05 (95% CI: -1.17 to 1.08) points; P=0.95]. Subjective symptoms were quite mild after using both techniques. Conclusions: The impact of DVT-based procedures on microsurgeons includes enhanced accommodation and sympathetic activity, but the changes and surgical performance are not significantly different from those of microscopy-based microsurgery. Our findings indicate that short-term use of DVT is reliable for microsurgery and the long-term effect of using DVT deserve more consideration.