[Intramedullary carcinoma metastasis in a female patient with syringomyelia].

J. Kulczycki,Szubińska-Marlicz

1977-04-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Long-Term Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yutian Li,Huiwen Yang,Xun Niu,Yu Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14182028

IF: 3.6

2024-09-14

Diagnostics

Abstract:Objective: This systematic review investigates the long-term effect of cochlear implantation (CI) on clinical outcomes in tinnitus patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Database Sources: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 30 April 2024. Manual searches of reference lists supplemented these searches when necessary. Review Methods: Original studies included in the meta-analysis had to contain comparative pre- and postoperative data for SNHL patients who underwent CI. Outcomes measured were the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ). Results: A total of 28 studies comprising 853 patients showed significant tinnitus improvement after CI: THI mean difference (MD) −14.02 [95%CI −15.29 to −12.76, p < 0.001], TQ MD −15.85 [95%CI −18.97 to −12.74, p < 0.05], and VAS MD −3.12 [95%CI −3.49 to −2.76, p < 0.05]. Subgroup analysis indicated a significant difference between follow-up periods in THI (p < 0.0001) and VAS loudness (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Cochlear implantation substantially improves tinnitus in patients with hearing loss, though the effect may diminish over time. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

medicine, general & internal
Rab14 is part of the early endosomal clathrin‐coated TGN microdomain

T. Proikas-Cezanne,Anja Gaugel,T. Frickey,A. Nordheim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2006.08.053

2006-10-02

FEBS Letters

Abstract:
The impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life and psychological status in single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss with tinnitus and influencing factors of implantation intention: a preliminary study

Shuwen Fan,Chen Zhang,Min Chen,Jiabao Mao,Shufeng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08086-7

2023-06-28

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Abstract:PurposeThe current study aims to explore the therapeutic effect of cochlear implants (CIs) on tinnitus in patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss (SSD/AHL) as well as the improvement of tinnitus-related quality of life and psychological status. In addition, we also explored whether the levels of quality of life and psychological status was related to the patient's implantation intention.MethodsSeven patients decided to receive cochlear implantation. Before and after implantation, they completed the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) to assess tinnitus severity, the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) to assess the quality of life, the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ) to assess psychological status. The other 8 SSD patients refused cochlear implantation. Their scores of the above questionnaires were compared with those of patients received implantation.ResultsSix months after cochlear implantations, the tinnitus perception, loudness, and annoyance significantly decreased compared to that before implantation. In terms of quality of life and physiological status, no statistically significant changes were detected in SSQ, SF-36, and SCSQ measurements. The score of annoyance subcategory of VAS and all subcategories of SSQ of patients refused implantation were better than those of implanted patients before implantation.ConclusionsThese results suggest that CIs can significantly reduce tinnitus severity. Patients refused implantation had better status in the annoyance of VAS and all subcategories of SSQ scores than those received implantation.

otorhinolaryngology
The Influence of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review

Nicole Peter,Nuwan Liyanage,Flurin Pfiffner,Alexander Huber,Tobias Kleinjung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599819846084

2019-05-07

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery

Abstract:Objectives This systematic review provides an overview of the available studies (published by January 29, 2018) with descriptive data analysis about the influence of cochlear implantation on tinnitus in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD). Data Sources PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Review Methods Original studies about the influence of cochlear implantation on tinnitus, measured with different tinnitus questionnaires or visual analog scale, in patients with SSD were included. The pre- and postimplantation tinnitus scores of the included studies were extracted for the further systematic review. Results The systematic search yielded 1028 studies. After evaluating titles, abstracts, and full texts, 1011 of these were dismissed. From the remaining 17 studies, 4 showed a low directness of evidence or high risk of bias and were therefore excluded. Due to the nature of cochlear implantation in SSD, only cohort studies and no randomized trials exist, which limits the evaluation in a systematic review. Generally, the mean tinnitus questionnaire scores decreased after cochlear implantation in these 13 studies with a total of 153 patients. The most widely used tinnitus questionnaire was the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. In these studies, 34.2% of patients demonstrated complete suppression, 53.7% an improvement, 7.3% a stable value, and 4.9% an increase of tinnitus, and none of the patients reported an induction of tinnitus. Conclusion This review shows a clear improvement of tinnitus complaints after cochlear implantation in patients with SSD. Therefore, tinnitus might be considered as an additional indication for cochlear implantation in SSD.
Quality of life after intervention with a cochlear implant or hearing aid

Kevin J. Contrera,Joshua Betz,Lingsheng Li,Caitlin R. Blake,Yoon K. Sung,Janet S. Choi,Frank R. Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25848

IF: 2.97

2016-01-17

The Laryngoscope

Abstract:OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the impact of hearing aid and cochlear implant use on quality of life in adults.STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study.METHODS: One hundred thirteen adults aged ≥50 years with postlingual hearing loss receiving routine clinical care at a tertiary academic medical center were evaluated with the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 before and 6 and 12 months after intervention with hearing aids or cochlear implants. Change in score was assessed using linear mixed effect models adjusted for age, gender, education, and history of hypertension, diabetes, and smoking.RESULTS: A significant increase in Mental Component Summary score was observed in both hearing aid and cochlear implant users from baseline to 12 months, with cochlear implant users increasing nearly twice that of hearing aid users (hearing aid: 2.49 [95% confidence interval: 0.11, 4.88], P = .041; cochlear implant: 4.20 [95% confidence interval: 1.85, 6.55], P < .001). The most substantial increases were observed in individuals with the lowest baseline scores. There was no significant difference in physical component summary score from baseline to 12 months.CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of hearing loss with hearing aids and cochlear implants results in significant increases in mental health quality of life. The majority of the increase is observed by 6 months post-treatment, and we observed differential effects of treatment depending on the level of baseline quality of life score with the greatest gains observed in those with the lowest scores.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b. Laryngoscope, 126:2110-2115, 2016.

medicine, research & experimental,otorhinolaryngology
[Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Ipsilateral Tinnitus].

Duo-duo Tao,Bing Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2012.25.008

2012-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:Cochlear implantation is the current standard of care in patients with significant sensorineural hearing loss. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of cochlear implantation on ipsilateral tinnitus.METHODS:With standard assessment table and standard testing program, 48 postlingual hearing-impaired adults aged 18 - 62 years (mean age at implantation: 35.0) were operated at 5 clinical centers from June 2009 to March 2010. There were 23 males (47.9%) and 25 females (52.1%). We evaluated the pre- and post-implantation degrees of tinnitus, performed free sound field audiometry and scored speech perception during different periods. Secondary analyses were conducted to examine the correlation between the effects of implantation on tinnitus and hearing or speech perception rehabilitation.RESULTS:Before implantation, there were 16 cases with ipsilateral tinnitus and 32 cases without tinnitus. After implantation, among 16 cases, the outcomes were recovery (n = 6), tinnitus suppression (n = 1) and no change in symptoms (n = 9). The total effective rate was 43.8%. Among another 32 cases without preoperative tinnitus, 2 cases developed tinnitus after implantation. The effects of cochlear implantation on tinnitus were negatively correlated with the course of tinnitus. There was no more correlation with other factors.CONCLUSION:Cochlear implants have significant therapeutic effects on tinnitus in 43.8% of implant users. Better efficacies are correlated with a shorter course of tinnitus. However, tinnitus suppression using electrical stimulation via cochlear implantation for deafness needs to be further evaluated.
[Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus and the Prognosis Mode Analysis].

Zhichao Wang,Qi Huang,Bing Chen,Huamao Cheng,Yun Li,Min Xie,Wen Xie,Meiping Huang,Chunfu Dai,Hao Wu,Weijia Kong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.11.002

2020-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To describe the effects of the possible related factors in unilateral cochlear implantation（CI） on tinnitus，and analysis the hearing and speech ability in different tinnitus prognosis mode. Method:The 70 post-lingual deafness CI patients（27.73±14.032 years old） in the clinical trial for LCI-20PI cochlear implant and LSP-20A sound processor project by a fast questionnaire about the tinnitus positive or negative respectively before the CI, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th months after the first mapping. 6 modes about tinnitus development were record: Type A（-to-）, no tinnitus before the CI and continued negative until the last follow-up; Type B（+ to-）, have tinnitus before CI and disappeared after the mapping; Type C（-to +）, no tinnitus before but appeared after the surgery; Type D（+ to-to +）, have tinnitus before the CI and disappeared during the continue follow-up, but finally the tinnitus show up again at last; Type E（-to + to-）, no tinnitus before and suffered from tinnitus after the CI surgery, but the noise disappeared at last; Type F（+ to +）, have the tinnitus in all the duration. Then we briefly analyzed the factors like age, gender, the duration of hearing loss, and the duration of hearing aids usage. Compare the characteristics in all the modes of tinnitus prognosis. Result:In this research CI treatment effect rate on tinnitus is 80%. The mean age of Type A （tinnitus from -to- ） group is （20.79 ±11.364） years old; Type B （tinnitus from + to-） group is （32.69±10.606） years old; Type C（tinnitus from-to +） group is （40.25±2.217） years old; Type D（tinnitus from + to-to +） group is （28.00±0） years old; Type E （tinnitus from-to + to-） group is （52.50±6.364） years old; Type F （tinnitus from + to +） group is （30.33±11.015） years old. And P<0.05 between the groups, while the severe-deaf-duration intergroup differences （P>0.05）. The mean speech discrimination rates are all elevate after 12 months and no statistical significance between the groups. But the E group has a lowst elevation in mean pure tone threshold （22.50±3.535 ） dB HL, when the F group has the best promotion （56.04±10.649 ） dB HL, and the difference between the groups is statistically significant. Conclusion:The cochlear implantation could eliminate tinnitus in 80% patients in this research. The better elevation of hearing and speech ability in the patients with persist tinnitus pre-and post-CI usage may related to amount and functions of the residual auditory nerves. Age may be an important factor in tinnitus generation, which may need more explanation and attention during the rehabilitation period.
Cochlear implant induced changes in cortical networks associated with tinnitus severity

Mehrnaz Shoushtarian,Jamal Esmaelpoor,Michelle Monica Gandol Bravo,James B Fallon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad731d

IF: 5.043

2024-08-26

Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract:Objective: We investigated tinnitus-related cortical networks in cochlear implant users who experience tinnitus and whose perception of tinnitus changes with use of their implant. Tinnitus, the perception of unwanted sounds which are not present externally, can be a debilitating condition. In individuals with cochlear implants, use of the implant is known to modulate tinnitus, often improving symptoms but worsening them in some cases. Little is known about underlying cortical changes with use of the implant, which lead to changes in tinnitus perception. In this study we investigated whether changes in brain networks with the cochlear implant turned on and off, were associated with changes in tinnitus perception, as rated subjectively. Approach: Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), we recorded cortical activity at rest, from 14 cochlear implant users who experienced tinnitus. Recordings were performed with the cochlear implant turned off and on. For each condition, participants rated the loudness and annoyance of their tinnitus using a visual rating scale. Changes in neural synchrony have been reported in humans and animal models of tinnitus. To assess neural synchrony, functional connectivity networks with the implant turned on and off, were compared using two network features: node strength and diversity coefficient. Main results: Changes in subjective ratings of loudness were significantly correlated with changes in node strength, averaged across occipital channels (r=-0.65,p = 0.01). Changes in both loudness and annoyance were significantly correlated with changes in diversity coefficient averaged across all channels (r=-0.79,p<0.001 and r = -0.86,p<0.001). More distributed connectivity with the implant on, compared to implant off, was associated with a reduction in tinnitus loudness and annoyance. Significance: A better understanding of neural mechanisms underlying tinnitus suppression with cochlear implant use, could lead to their application as a tinnitus treatment and pave the way for effective use of other less invasive stimulation-based treatments.

engineering, biomedical,neurosciences
Changes in the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire after Cochlear Implantation

Tao Pan,Richard S. Tyler,Haihong Ji,Claudia Coelho,Anne K. Gehringer,Stephanie A. Gogel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2009/07-0042)

2009-01-01

American Journal of Audiology

Abstract:Purpose To determine (a) changes in the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) for patients using cochlear implants, (b) differences between patients who receive total or partial relief, and (c) identifiable characteristics of those who report tinnitus after implantation. Method Pre- and postoperatively, 244 adults were administered the THQ when they reported tinnitus. Results Of the 153 patients who had tinnitus preoperatively, 94 (61%) patients reported total suppression and 59 (39%) reported a partial reduction. In 91 patients who did not have tinnitus before implantation, 11 (12%) reported tinnitus postimplantation. The THQ score decreased from 41% preimplant to 30% postimplant. The largest reductions involved social handicap and hearing. Patients with a more severe hearing loss might be more likely to experience an exacerbation of their tinnitus. We were not able to clearly identify differences between patients who received total or partial relief and the characteristics of patients who reported tinnitus after implantation. Those who acquired tinnitus had the shortest duration hearing loss (5.6 years) and were the oldest (63 years). The average THQ score of patients getting tinnitus was 29%. Conclusions Most tinnitus patients benefit from receiving a cochlear implant.
Targeted Drug Delivery: Carbon-Quantum-Dots-Loaded Mesoporous Silica Nanocarriers with pH-Switchable Zwitterionic Surface and Enzyme-Responsive Pore-Cap for Targeted Imaging and Drug Delivery to Tumor (Adv. Healthcare Mater. 12/2016).

Zhongning Liu,Xin Chen,Xiaojin Zhang,J. Gooding,Yongsheng Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201670058

IF: 10

2016-06-01

Advanced Healthcare Materials

Abstract:On page 1401 X. Chen, X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, and co-workers describe the synthesis of mesoporous silica nanocarriers with pH-switchable antifouling zwitterionic surfaces and blue fluorescence that are capable of enzyme-responsive drug release. The system combines tumor treatment and tracking. It shows great potential for cancer treatment, since it exhibits prolonged circulation in the blood system with zero premature release while offering selective cellular uptake, tumor labeling, and intracellular drug release in tumor tissue.
General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation

Theodore R McRackan,Joshua E Fabie,Prashant N Bhenswala,Shaun A Nguyen,Judy R Dubno

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002225

Abstract:Objective: To determine the extent to which bilateral cochlear implantation increases patient-reported benefit as compared with unilateral implantation and no implantation. Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases searches were performed using the keywords ("Cochlear Implant" or "Cochlear Implantation") and ("bilateral"). Study selection: Studies assessing hearing/CI-specific (CI) and general-health-related (HR) quality of life (QOL) in adult patients after bilateral cochlear implantation were included. Data extraction: Of the 31 articles meeting criteria, usable QOL data were available for 16 articles (n = 355 bilateral CI recipients). Data synthesis: Standardized mean difference (Δ) for each measure and weighted effects were determined. Meta-analysis was performed for all QOL measures and also independently for hearing/CI-specific QOL and HRQOL. Conclusion: When measured using hearing/CI-specific QOL instruments, patients reported very large improvements in QOL comparing before cochlear implantation to bilateral CI (Δ=2.07 [1.76-2.38]) and medium improvements comparing unilateral CI to bilateral CI (Δ=0.51 [0.32- 0.71]). Utilization of parallel versus crossover study design did not impact QOL outcomes (χ = 0.512, p = 0.47). No detectable improvements were observed in either CI transition when using HRQOL instruments (no CI to bilateral CI: Δ=0.40 [-0.02 to 0.81]; unilateral CI to bilateral CI: Δ=0.22 [-0.02 to 0.46]).The universal nature of HRQOL instruments may render them insensitive to the medium to large QOL improvements reported by patients using hearing/CI-specific QOL instruments. Given that HRQOL instruments are used to determine the economic benefit of health interventions, these measurement differences suggest that the health economic value of bilateral cochlear implantation has been underestimated.
Non-invasive treatments improve patient outcomes in chronic tinnitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Tingting Lu,Qingxin Wang,Ziyan Gu,Zefang Li,Zhaojun Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101438

Abstract:Objective: To investigate the relative effectiveness of various Non-Invasive Treatment Techniques (NITs) in chronic tinnitus management. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from the time of data construction to December 31, 2022. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, NITs were evaluated, including Aacceptance and commitment therapy (A), Cognitive behavioral therapy (C), Sound therapy (S), Transcranial magnetic stimulation (T), Electrical stimulation therapy (E), Virtual reality therapy (V), tinnitus Retraining therapy (R), general psychotherapy (D), and Placebo (P). The outcome indicators included the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety-Depression (HADS-D), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Visual Analogue Scales-Loudness (VAS-L), and Visual Analogue Scales-Distress (VAS-D). Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 14.0 for NMA. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 22 randomized controlled trials comprising 2,354 patients. The treatment effects varied on each scale. For THI, S (86.9%) was the most effective, whereas P (6.5%) was the worst. For TQ, C (89.5%) was the most effective, whereas D (25.4%) was the worst. For HADS-D, A (82.4%) was the most effective, whereas D (9.47%) was the worst. For ISI, A (83.2%) was the most effective, whereas R (20.6%) was the worst. For VAS-L, S (73.5%) was the most effective, whereas E (18.9%) was the worst. For VAS-D, C (84.7%) was the most effective, whereas P (18.1%) was the worst. Conclusions: The combination of acoustics and cognitive behavioral therapy may be an effectively treat patients with chronic tinnitus. Level of evidence: How common is the problem? Level 2. Is this diagnostic or monitoring test accurate? (Diagnosis) Level 1. What will happen if we do not add a therapy? (Prognosis) Level 1. Does this intervention help? (Treatment Benefits) Level 1. What are the COMMON harms? (Treatment Harms) Level 1. What are the RARE harms? (Treatment Harms) Level 1. Is this (early detection) test worthwhile? (Screening) Level 1I.
Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Patients with Mitochondrial Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

Nawal Zia,Yasmin Nikookam,Jameel Muzaffar,Peter Kullar,Peter Monksfield,Manohar Bance

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2020.9226

Abstract:This study's aim was to establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with mitochondrial disorders associated with deafness. Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched: Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, COCHRANE, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits on language or year of publication. Review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Searches identified 437 abstracts and 37 full text articles, of which 11 studies met the inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in a total of 17 patients. All implants achieved good hearing outcomes, and follow-up ranged between 1 week and 12 months. The methodological quality of the included studies was sufficient, scoring grades 3 to 4 using the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine grading system. All studies were retrospective and consisted of case reviews and case reports. All cases of CI showed positive outcomes in speech perception and detection. There is some qualitative evidence to suggest improvement in quality of life and satisfaction postoperatively. There was very limited information available on secondary outcomes such as surgical complications, quality of life, and method of cochlear implant insertion. The small sample size of our patient cohort and quality of studies suggests a need for large-scale studies with more robust methodology to assess the effectiveness of CI. There is a need for studies that assess other factors to be considered when counseling patients about cochlear implants, such as adverse events, surgical complications, and long-term benefits.
Cochlear Implantation in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Patients: Speech Perception and Quality of Life

Nicole I. Farber,Oliver Y. Chin,Dawna M. Mills,Rodney C. Diaz,Hilary A. Brodie,Doron Sagiv

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241232206

2024-02-17

Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology

Abstract:Annals of Otology, Rhinology &Laryngology, Ahead of Print. Objectives:There is a limited understanding of the impact of cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), given the scarcity of reported cases. We aim to evaluate the audiological outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after CI in CMT.Methods:Multi-institutional, university-affiliated, tertiary-referral centers, retrospective chart review.Our cohort includes 5 patients with CMT. Patients' charts were reviewed for demographic characteristics, operation notes, and pre- and post-implantation audiology evaluation. Patients completed the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-10 (CIQOL-10) Global questionnaire.Results:Pre-implantation, the mean pure tone average was 84.1 ± 7.2 dB, and the mean word recognition score was 2.4% in the implanted ear. AzBio sentence test was performed in quiet, revealing a mean of 4 ± 1.4% in the implanted ear. Post-implantation, PTA results were all within the mild hearing loss range (mean 33.0 ± 5.9 dB). Post-CI, AZ-Bio test results were 5%, 65%, and 74% (for 3 patients), and HINT scores were 55% and 58% (for 2 patients). The mean score of the CIQOL-10 questionnaire was 42.7 ± 10.47 (range 1-100). Patients were most satisfied with their ability to listen to the television or radio, have conversations in a quiet environment, and feel comfortable being themselves.Conclusion:To the best of our knowledge, this is the most extensive series of CI in CMT-associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy. Our cohort suggests that CI is a safe and reliable method for hearing rehabilitation that can achieve good speech performance and improve QoL in CMT patients.

otorhinolaryngology
Cognitive Changes Up to 4 Years After Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults: A Prospective Longitudinal Study Using the RBANS-H

Tinne Vandenbroeke,Ellen Andries,Marc J Lammers,Paul Van de Heyning,Anouk Hofkens-Van den Brandt,Olivier Vanderveken,Vincent Van Rompaey,Griet Mertens

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001583

2024-09-04

Abstract:Objectives: Hearing loss is a worldwide health problem that currently affects around 20% of the world's population. Untreated hearing loss can have a significant impact on daily life, it can cause social isolation, loneliness, frustration, and higher anxiety and depression rates. Furthermore, older adults with hearing impairment have a higher risk for accelerated cognitive decline compared with normal-hearing individuals. Previous research indicated a positive effect of cochlear implantation on Health-related Quality of life (HRQoL) and cognitive functioning 1 year after cochlear implantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effect of cochlear implantation on cognition and HRQoL in older adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Design: All included subjects were 55 years or older with postlingual, bilateral, severe-to-profound hearing loss, and received a unilateral cochlear implant. Cognition was evaluated using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for Hearing Impaired Individuals (RBANS-H), and HRQoL was evaluated using the following five questionnaires: Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ); Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI); Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12); Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS); and Type D questionnaire (DS14). Individuals were evaluated preoperatively, and annually up to 4 years after CI activation. Results: After cochlear implantation an improvement in hearing, cognition, and HRQoL was observed. When comparing preoperative and 12 months postoperative results a significant improvement was observed in the total RBANS-H score (mean [SD], 92.78 [±15.08] versus 98.35 [±14.18], p < 0.001) and the subdomain scores for "Immediate Memory" (94.13 [±18.75] versus 105.39 [±19.98], p = 0.005), "Attention" (86.17 [±19.02] versus 91.57 [±15.35], p = 0.048), and "Delayed memory" (97.91 [±14.51] versus 103.83 [±14.714], p = 0.017). When comparing preoperative results with 4 years postoperative results, a significant improvement was observed in "Immediate Memory" (94.13 [±18.75] versus 101.91 [±16.09], p = 0.020) and a significant decline was observed in "Visuospatial Memory" (97.04 [±17.47] versus 87.26 [±13.41], p = 0.013). Compared with the preoperative results, no significant improvement was observed in the total RBANS-H score 4 years after implantation. A significant improvement was observed for the HRQoL questionnaires, that is, NCIQ, HISQUI19, SSQ12, HADS, and DS14, 1 year after cochlear implantation. When comparing preoperative results with 4-year postoperative results, significant improvement was observed for the NCIQ and DS14 social inhibition scores. Long-term results of the SSQ12 and HISQUI19 were lacking. Conclusions: Unilateral cochlear implantation in an adult population with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss has a positive effect on cognitive functioning and HRQoL 1 year after activation. This positive effect on cognitive functioning was no longer observed 4 years after cochlear implantation. Further research is needed to explain individual variation in the evolution of cognitive functioning.
Tinnitus reduction in patients with single-sided deafness: the effect of cochlear implantation, bone conduction devices, and contralateral routing of sound hearing aids investigated in a randomized controlled trial

Anne W. Wendrich,Kelly K. S. Assouly,Jan A. A. van Heteren,Jeroen P. M. Peters,Wilko Grolman,Robert J. Stokroos,Huib Versnel,Adriana L. Smit

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1428106

IF: 3.4

2024-07-23

Frontiers in Neurology

Abstract:Objectives: Single-sided deafness (SSD) is often accompanied by tinnitus, resulting in a decreased quality of life. Currently, there is a lack of high level of evidence studies comparing different treatment options for SSD regarding tinnitus reduction. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effect of a cochlear implant (CI), bone conduction device (BCD), contralateral routing of sound (CROS), and no treatment on tinnitus outcomes in SSD patients, with follow-up extending to 24 months. Methods: A total of 120 adult SSD patients were randomized to three groups: CI, a trial period with first a BCD on a headband, then a CROS, or vice versa. After the trial periods, patients opted for a BCD, CROS, or no treatment. At the start of follow-up, 28 patients were implanted with a CI, 25 patients with a BCD, 34 patients had a CROS, and 26 patients chose no treatment. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were completed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. Results: The CI and BCD groups showed significantly decreased tinnitus impact scores. The CI group showed the largest decrease, which was already observed at 3 months of follow-up. Compared to the baseline, the median THI score decreased by 23 points, the TQ score by 17 points, and the VAS score by 60 points at 24 months. In the BCD group, the TQ score decreased by 9 points, and the VAS decreased by 25 points at 24 months. The HADS anxiety and depression subscale showed no indication for anxiety or depression at baseline, nor at 24 months, for all groups. Conclusion: In this RCT, SSD patients treated with a CI or BCD showed an overall decrease in tinnitus impact scores up to 24 months compared to baseline. The CI group reported a stable and the largest reduction. Cochlear implants appear to be superior to BCD and CROS, and no treatment for achieving partial or complete resolution of tinnitus in patients with SSD. Clinical trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register, www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl/nl/trial/26952, NTR4457, CINGLE trial.

neurosciences,clinical neurology
Quality of Life With Cochlear Implantation Using the CIQOL-35 at a Tertiary Urban Medical Center: Our Experience

Kaitlyn A. Brooks,Khaled Altartoor,Esther X. Vivas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000004167

2024-03-22

Otology & Neurotology

Abstract:Objective Assessment of quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 questionnaire (CIQOL-35). Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Single-institution tertiary care center. Patients Patients 18 years and older who have undergone CI and CIQOL-35 survey. Interventions Implementing CIQOL-35 from 2019 to 2022 to measure change in QOL after CI. Statistical analysis included nonparametric, univariate, and multivariate analyses. Significance was set at 0.05. Main Outcome Measures Differences in QOL among CI patients in each of the CIQOL-35 domains. Results Ninety-three patients (40 female, 53 male) aged 20 to 93 years (median 70 years) turned in 164 QOL surveys (68 preactivation, 96 postactivation). Postactivation median QOL was 5 to 15 points higher across all domains ( p < 0.001). QOL score distributions among unilateral CI only, bilateral CI, and unilateral CI with contralateral hearing aid users were not statistically different ( p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified that male sex ( β = −2.0; 95% confidence interval, −3.9 to −0.1) was a negative predictor for environment scores and not being married ( β = 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 4.0) was a positive predictor for entertainment scores. Median follow-up time was 13 months post-CI (interquartile range [IQR], 7.1–21.5 months). Conclusions CI patients experienced improved QOL postactivation among all QOL domains, whereas specific CI use pattern in regard to unilateral, bilateral, or bimodal did not affect QOL. Multivariate analysis identified marital status and sex as possible QOL predictors.

clinical neurology,otorhinolaryngology
Efficacy of Amplification for Tinnitus Relief in People With Mild Hearing Loss

Anna Chi Shan Kam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_jslhr-23-00031

2024-01-26

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research

Abstract:Purpose: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of amplification with hearing aids for people with chronic subjective tinnitus and mild hearing loss. Method: In this randomized, controlled, three-arm trial, 38 subjects with a primary complaint of tinnitus were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups. Twelve subjects received informational counselling (IC) only, 13 received IC with hearing aid fitting, and 13 subjects received IC with individualized music stimulation for 12 months. The primary efficacy analysis in tinnitus severity was based on the change from baseline to 12 months after the 1st day of the intervention. Secondary outcome measures included tinnitus impact, psychological and mental health effects, subjective ratings, and psychoacoustically measured tinnitus loudness. Results: A statistically significant treatment difference among the three groups in the Chinese Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI-CH) total score at the predefined end point in Month 12 was observed ( F = 3.34, p = .04, partial η 2 = .16). Reductions in the TFI-CH scores in both the hearing aid and the customized music group were more prominent than in the IC-only group. Only the hearing aid group showed a significantly greater treatment effect than the IC-only group. Conclusion: Results from this study support that a combination of hearing aid use and IC can help improve tinnitus in people with mild hearing loss. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25015979

rehabilitation,audiology & speech-language pathology,linguistics
Changes in cognitive performance after cochlear implantation in adults and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rogério Hamerschmidt,Vanessa Mazanek Santos,Flavio Magno Gonçalves,Audrey Delcenserie,François Champoux,Cristiano Miranda de Araujo,Adriana Bender Moreira de Lacerda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2022.2050823

Abstract:Objectives: To conduct critical assessment of the literature on the effects of cochlear implantation on adults' cognitive abilities. Design: PubMed, Scopus, Lilacs, Web of Science, Livivo, Cochrane, Embase, PsycInfo, and grey literature were searched. Eligibility criteria: age 18 or over with severe-to-profound bilateral hearing loss, cochlear implantation, cognitive test before and after implantation. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB, ROBINS-I and MASTARI tools. Meta-analysis was performed. Study sample: Out of 1830 studies, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Results: On AlaCog test, significant improvement was found after implantation [MD = -46.64; CI95% = -69.96 to -23.33; I2 = 71%]. No significant differences were found on the Flanker, Recall, Trail A and n-back tests (p > 0.05). For MMSE, no significance was found [MD 0.63; CI 95% = -2.19 to 3.45; I2 = 88%]. On TMT, an overall significant effect with a 9-second decrease in processing speed post-implantation [MD = -9.43; CI95% = -15.42 to -3.44; I2 = 0%]. Conclusion: Cognitive improvements after cochlear implantation may depend on time and the cognitive task evaluated. Well-designed studies with longer follow-up are necessary to examine whether cochlear implantation has a positive influence on cognitive abilities. Development of cognitive assessment tools to hearing-impaired individuals is needed.
Long-term outcome of patients with Ménière’s disease following cochlear implantation: a comprehensive outcome study with validated assessment tools

Miray-Su Yılmaz Topçuoğlu,Peter K. Plinkert,Mark Praetorius,Sara Euteneuer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08690-1

2024-05-20

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Abstract:Abstract Purpose Patients suffering from Ménière’s disease (MD) experience vertigo, and impairments in hearing and quality of life (QoL). This study aims to investigate the impact of cochlear implantation (CI) on various aspects affecting patients with MD. Methods A single tertiary centre’s CI database for CI recipients with MD between 2014 and 2022 was screened retrospectively. Hearing, vertigo, tinnitus symptoms, and hearing-related QoL were assessed. Pre- and postoperative hearing tests in conjunction with subjective outcome measures by visual analogue scale (VAS) and validated tools such as the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ), as well as the assessment of the pre- and postoperative Functional Level Scale (FLS) were examined. Results Eleven ears were included (median age: 59 years at implantation). Following implantation, there was a significant enhancement in Word Recognition Scores at sound levels of 65 dB and 80 dB compared to before treatment (preop vs. 12 months postop: p = 0.012). However, no significant enhancement was observed for 50 dB. MD-related impairments improved significantly postoperatively, as measured by the VAS (vertigo: p = 0.017; tinnitus: p = 0.042), DHI (p = 0.043), THI (p = 0.043) and NCIQ (p < 0.001). The FLS improved significantly (p = 0.020). Conclusion CI has positive effects on all areas examined in our cohort. However, discrimination of speech at low sound pressure levels remained problematic postoperatively. In patients suffering from MD, the prioritized treatment goals include not only improved hearing but also the rehabilitation of vertigo and tinnitus, as well as the enhancement of QoL. Validated instruments are useful screening tools.

otorhinolaryngology

[Intramedullary carcinoma metastasis in a female patient with syringomyelia].

The Long-Term Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Rab14 is part of the early endosomal clathrin‐coated TGN microdomain

The impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life and psychological status in single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss with tinnitus and influencing factors of implantation intention: a preliminary study

The Influence of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review

Quality of life after intervention with a cochlear implant or hearing aid

[Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Ipsilateral Tinnitus].

[Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus and the Prognosis Mode Analysis].

Cochlear implant induced changes in cortical networks associated with tinnitus severity

Changes in the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire after Cochlear Implantation

Targeted Drug Delivery: Carbon-Quantum-Dots-Loaded Mesoporous Silica Nanocarriers with pH-Switchable Zwitterionic Surface and Enzyme-Responsive Pore-Cap for Targeted Imaging and Drug Delivery to Tumor (Adv. Healthcare Mater. 12/2016).

General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation

Non-invasive treatments improve patient outcomes in chronic tinnitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Patients with Mitochondrial Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

Cochlear Implantation in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Patients: Speech Perception and Quality of Life

Cognitive Changes Up to 4 Years After Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults: A Prospective Longitudinal Study Using the RBANS-H

Tinnitus reduction in patients with single-sided deafness: the effect of cochlear implantation, bone conduction devices, and contralateral routing of sound hearing aids investigated in a randomized controlled trial

Quality of Life With Cochlear Implantation Using the CIQOL-35 at a Tertiary Urban Medical Center: Our Experience

Efficacy of Amplification for Tinnitus Relief in People With Mild Hearing Loss

Changes in cognitive performance after cochlear implantation in adults and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Long-term outcome of patients with Ménière’s disease following cochlear implantation: a comprehensive outcome study with validated assessment tools