Equivocation in EEG Reporting: The Clinician's Response

W. Friedlander
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/155005947901000407
1979-10-01
Abstract:Evidence is presented that about 29% of the time that an electroencephalographer feels he needs to equivocate about the findings in an EEG, the clinician interprets, or at least recalls, the EEG without this equivocation. When there is a lack of recall of an equivocal report, the clinician's error is usually in the direction of considering that the record has been interpreted by the electroencephalographer as being abnormal.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?