Abstract:Background: Telemonitoring patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) can improve their care management. However, the results of cost-effectiveness studies are heterogeneous. Therefore, it is still a matter of debate whether telemonitoring is worth the investment. Objective: This systematic review aims to investigate the cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring patients with CIEDs, focusing on its key drivers, and the impact of the varying perspectives. Methods: A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and EconLit. The search was completed on July 7, 2022. Studies were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: patients had a CIED, comparison with standard care, and inclusion of health economic evaluations (eg, cost-effectiveness analyses and cost-utility analyses). Only complete and peer-reviewed studies were included, and no year limits were applied. The exclusion criteria included studies with partial economic evaluations, systematic reviews or reports, and studies without standard care as a control group. Besides general study characteristics, the following outcome measures were extracted: impact on total cost or income, cost or income drivers, cost or income drivers per patient, cost or income drivers as a percentage of the total cost impact, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, or cost-utility ratios. Quality was assessed using the Consensus Health Economic Criteria checklist. Results: Overall, 15 cost-effectiveness analyses were included. All studies were performed in Western countries, mainly Europe, and had primarily a male participant population. Of the 15 studies, 3 (20%) calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, 1 (7%) the cost-utility ratio, and 11 (73%) the health and cost impact of telemonitoring. In total, 73% (11/15) of the studies indicated that telemonitoring of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy ICDs was cost-effective and cost-saving, both from a health care and patient perspective. Cost-effectiveness results for telemonitoring of patients with pacemakers were inconclusive. The key drivers for cost reduction from a health care perspective were hospitalizations and scheduled in-office visits. Hospitalization costs were reduced by up to US $912 per patient per year. Scheduled in-office visits included up to 61% of the total cost reduction. Key drivers for cost reduction from a patient perspective were loss of income, cost for scheduled in-office visits and transport. Finally, of the 15 studies, 8 (52%) reported improved quality of life, with statistically significance in only 1 (13%) study (P=.03). Conclusions: From a health care and patient perspective, telemonitoring of patients with an ICD or a cardiac resynchronization therapy ICD is a cost-effective and cost-saving alternative to standard care. Inconclusive results were found for patients with pacemakers. However, telemonitoring can lead to a decrease in providers' income, mainly due to a lack of reimbursement. Introducing appropriate reimbursement could make telemonitoring sustainable for providers while still being cost-effective from a health care payer perspective. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42022322334; https://tinyurl.com/puunapdr.

Scheduled versus alert transmissions for remote follow-up of cardiac implantable electronic devices: Clinical relevance and resource consumption

[Experiences of Applying Home Monitoring for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices].

Remote Monitoring: How to Maximize Efficiency through Appropriate Organization in a Device Clinic

Assessing adherence to remote monitoring recommendations for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a retrospective analysis

Switching to a 100% remote follow‐up of implantable cardiac electronic devices: Organizational model and results of a single center experience

Utilization of remote reprogramming to manage insertable cardiac monitor arrhythmia alert burden

Evaluation for the Usability of Carelink Remote Monitoring System by Clinical Physicians

Abstract 15437: Use of Artificial Intelligence to Decrease Data Deluge From Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Alert-driven vs scheduled remote monitoring of implantable cardiac defibrillators: A cost-consequence analysis from the TRUST trial

Telemonitoring heart failure in a remote region: data from cardiac implantable electronic devices

Application value of remote device follow-up system in patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator

Investigating the Cost-Effectiveness of Telemonitoring Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Systematic Review

Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices using smart device interface versus radiofrequency-based interface: a systematic review

Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Remote monitoring of implanted cardiac devices: a plea for a nationwide exploration

Home monitoring in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator

Automatic remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead and generator performance: the Lumos-T Safely RedUceS RouTine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) trial

Appropriate use of wearable defibrillators with multiparametric evaluation to avoid unnecessary defibrillator implantation

Application of remote data transmission in postoperation acute phase follow-up in patients with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome

Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices to predict acute clinical decompensation events

Current status of reimbursement practices for remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electrical devices across Europe