Evaluating the efficacy of serological testing of clinical specimens collected from patients with suspected brucellosis
Nannan Xu,Chunmei Qu,Lintao Sai,Sai Wen,Lulu Yang,Shanshan Wang,Hui Yang,Hui Liu,Gang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011131
2023-02-23
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Abstract:This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the standard agglutination test (SAT), the Brucellacapt test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in clinical specimens collected from patients with suspected brucellosis. A prospective study was conducted from December 2020 to December 2021. Brucellosis was diagnosed on the basis of clinical evidence, and confirmed by isolation of Brucella or a four-fold rise in SAT titer. All samples were tested by the SAT, ELISA and the Brucellacapt test. Titers ≥1:100 were considered as SAT positive; ELISA was considered positive when an index greater than 11 was detected, while titers ≥1/160 indicated positivity on the Brucellacapt test. The specificity, sensitivity, and positive (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) of the three different methods were calculated. A total of 149 samples were collected from patients with suspected brucellosis. The sensitivities for the SAT, IgG, and IgM detection were 74.42%, 88.37% and 74.42%, respectively. The specificities were 95.24%, 93.65%, and 88.89%, respectively. The simultaneous measurement of IgG and IgM improved the sensitivity (98.84%) but reduced the specificity (84.13%) compared to each antibody test separately. The Brucellacapt test had excellent specificity (100%) and a high PPV (100%); however, the sensitivity and NPV were 88.37% and 86.30%, respectively. The combination of IgG detection by ELISA and the Brucellacapt test had excellent diagnostic performance, with 98.84% sensitivity and 93.65% specificity. This study showed that the simultaneous performance of IgG detection by ELISA and the Brucellacapt test has the potential to overcome the current limitations of detection. Brucellosis is an endemic zoonotic disease with significant impacts on public health worldwide. Early identification is crucial to reduce the rates of disability and mortality due to brucellosis. Human brucellosis is associated with a wide variety of clinical manifestations, making it difficult to diagnose clinically. Serological tests, which lack specificity and produce results that may be difficult to interpret, play a fundamental role in the diagnosis of this disease. Therefore, the combination of various serological tests may be helpful in ensuring the accuracy of diagnosis. Here, we aimed to explore the best combination among the SAT, ELISA and the Brucellacapt test to improve the efficiency of the diagnosis of human brucellosis.
tropical medicine,parasitology