Abstract:Background: A common approach to attempt to reduce maternal morbidity from hemorrhage is to recognize patients at increased risk, and to make advance preparations for possible blood transfusion in these patients. Preparation may consist of a hold clot, type, and screen, or crossmatch. Most hospitals, including ours, have pathways or guidelines that lay out which of these preparations should be made at the time a patient is admitted to labor and delivery. These are often based on risk factors for hemorrhage but do not take into account the probability that transfusion will be needed. The cost-effectiveness of performing a type and screen or routine crossmatch on patients admitted for delivery has been questioned. Several studies have shown that the chance of transfusions in individuals giving birth is very low. In terms of the need for routine blood preparation, the need for urgent transfusion is most relevant. This has not been included in studies of transfusion rates. Objective: The purpose of this study was to quantify the relative importance of risk factors present on admission for needing a blood transfusion and to develop a formula to define each individual's risk. This could then be used to decide an appropriate level of initial blood preparation for patients at different risk levels. Study design: Risk factors for hemorrhage and the level of transfusion preparation were extracted from the medical records of a cohort of 89,881 patients delivering in an 18-hospital healthcare system over 40 months. We tabulated the number who required at least one RBC transfusion and the number needing an urgent transfusion-defined as receiving blood during labor or within 4 hours after delivery. Odds ratios for requiring a transfusion were calculated for each risk factor. We then calculated the probability of needing a transfusion for each patient based on their risk factor profile. Results: A total of 643 patients had any transfusion during their hospitalization (0.72% of deliveries), and 311 had an urgent transfusion (0.35% of deliveries). The calculated probability of needing a transfusion was less than 1% in 87.8% of patients and was greater than 5% in 1.2% of patients. The chance of needing a transfusion was highest for placenta accreta spectrum, admission Hgb <8.0, and placenta previa. A second tier of risk factors included abruption, bleeding with no specific diagnosis, and Hgb between 8.0 and 10.0. Conclusion: In our cohort, very few patients received a transfusion. Applying a formula derived from patient-specific risk factors, we found that almost all patients have a very low probability of needing a transfusion, especially an urgent transfusion. Based on these results, we suggest that a hold clot be used except for the highest-risk patients or in settings with barriers to procuring blood in the rare case of urgent transfusion need. Making this change would greatly reduce hospital blood bank charges.

Obstetric Hemorrhage Risk Assessment Using the Maximum Allowable Blood Loss Calculation: Are We on the Right Track?

Ability of an obstetric hemorrhage risk assessment tool to predict quantitative peripartum blood loss

Guideline No. 431: Postpartum Hemorrhage and Hemorrhagic Shock

Comparing visual estimation and hematocrit change in the assessment of blood loss among women undergoing cesarean delivery in a tertiary facility in northern Uganda

Comparison of three antepartum risk assessment tools to predict significant postpartum hemorrhage in livebirths

Patient blood management guideline for adults with critical bleeding

Quantification of Blood Loss Improves Detection of Postpartum Hemorrhage and Accuracy of Postpartum Hemorrhage Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Risk factor stratification for urgent and nonurgent transfusion in patients giving birth

Estimating blood loss during cesarean delivery: A comparison of methods

Early feasibility and usability study of a novel obstetric blood loss quantifying device

Quantitative blood loss measurement methods for early detection of primary postpartum haemorrhage following vaginal birth: A scoping review

The impact of indication for cesarean on blood loss

Clinical and biological factors associated with red blood cell transfusion during severe postpartum haemorrhage – A single-center retrospective cohort study

Massive Transfusion Protocols in Obstetric Hemorrhage: Theory versus Reality

Undiagnosed abnormal postpartum blood loss: Incidence and risk factors

Association of Gestational Age with Postpartum Hemorrhage: An International Cohort Study

Accuracy of postpartum haemorrhage data in the 2011 Victorian Perinatal Data Collection: Results of a validation study

Strategies for optimising early detection and obstetric first response management of postpartum haemorrhage at caesarean birth: a modified Delphi-based international expert consensus

Do estimates of blood loss differ between student midwives and midwives? A multicenter cross-sectional study

The Role of Skin-to-Skin Contact and Breastfeeding on Atonic Postpartum Hemorrhage

External validation and comparison of four prediction scores for severe maternal morbidity