Palbociclib for Residual High-Risk Invasive HR-Positive and HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer-The Penelope-B Trial

Sibylle Loibl,Frederik Marmé,Miguel Martin,Michael Untch,Hervé Bonnefoi,Sung-Bae Kim,Harry Bear,Nicole McCarthy,Mireia Melé Olivé,Karen Gelmon,José García-Sáenz,Catherine M Kelly,Toralf Reimer,Masakazu Toi,Hope S Rugo,Carsten Denkert,Michael Gnant,Andreas Makris,Maria Koehler,Cynthia Huang-Bartelett,Maria Jose Lechuga Frean,Marco Colleoni,Gustavo Werutsky,Sabine Seiler,Nicole Burchardi,Valentina Nekljudova,Gunter von Minckwitz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.03639
2021-05-10
Abstract:Purpose: About one third of patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer who have residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) will relapse. Thus, additional therapy is needed. Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor demonstrating efficacy in the metastatic setting. Patients and methods: PENELOPE-B (NCT01864746) is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study in women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative primary breast cancer without a pathological complete response after taxane-containing NACT and at high risk of relapse (clinical pathological staging-estrogen receptor grading score ≥ 3 or 2 and ypN+). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib 125 mg once daily or placebo on days 1-21 in a 28-day cycle in addition to endocrine therapy (ET). Primary end point is invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Final analysis was planned after 290 iDFS events with a two-sided efficacy boundary P < .0463 because of two interim analyses. Results: One thousand two hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned. The median age was 49.0 years (range, 19-79), and the majority were ypN+ with Ki-67 ≤ 15%; 59.4% of patients had a clinical pathological staging-estrogen receptor grading score ≥ 3. 50.1% received aromatase inhibitor, and 33% of premenopausal women received a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analog in addition to either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. After a median follow-up of 42.8 months (92% complete), 308 events were confirmed. Palbociclib did not improve iDFS versus placebo added to ET-stratified hazard ratio, 0.93 (95% repeated CI, 0.74 to 1.17) and two-sided weighted log-rank test (Cui, Hung, and Wang) P = .525. There was no difference among the subgroups. Most common related serious adverse events were infections and vascular disorders in 113 (9.1%) patients with no difference between the treatment arms. Eight fatal serious adverse events (two palbociclib and six placebo) were reported. Conclusion: Palbociclib for 1 year in addition to ET did not improve iDFS in women with residual invasive disease after NACT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?