Effects of Cardiac Massage and β-Blocker Pretreatment on the Success Rate of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Assessed by the Canine Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Ventricular Fibrillation Model

Takeshi Wada,Mihoko Hagiwara-Nagasawa,Ryuichi Kambayashi,Ai Goto,Koki Chiba,Yoshio Nunoi,Hiroko Izumi-Nakaseko,Tadashi Koga,Akio Matsumoto,Yuji Nakazato,Keith G Lurie,Atsushi Sugiyama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0897
2021-09-24
Abstract:Background: Effects of rapid electrical defibrillation and β-blockade on coronary ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remain unknown. Methods and results: After induction of VF by 30 min of ischemia followed by reperfusion, animals were treated with defibrillation alone (Group A, n=13), 2 min of open-chest cardiac massage followed by defibrillation (Group B, n=11), or the same therapy to Group B with propranolol (1 mg/kg, i.v.) treatment before ischemia/reperfusion (Group C, n=11). If return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was not attained, each therapy was repeated ≤3 times (Set-1). When ROSC was not obtained within Set-1, cardiac massage was applied to all animals followed by defibrillation, which was repeated ≤3 times (Set-2). ROSC after Set-1 was 8% in Group A, 82% in Group B and 82% in Group C, whereas that after Set-2 was 62% in Group A, 100% in Group B and 82% in Group C. Each animal with ROSC in Groups A (n=8) and B (n=11) showed sinus rhythm, whereas those in Group C (n=9) had sinus rhythm (n=5), atrial fibrillation (n=1), accelerated idioventricular rhythm (n=2) and atrioventricular block (n=1). Post ROSC heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in Group C. Conclusions: Cardiac massage increased the likelihood of ROSC vs. rapid defibrillation, but β-blocker pretreatment may worsen hemodynamics and electrical stability after ROSC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?