[Cardiac and metabolic beta-adrenergic receptor blockade by pindolol in man].

A. Scheen,A. Luyckx,J. Juchmes,A. Cession-Fossion

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Effects of Hand Hygiene Intelligent Technology Implementation in Hospitals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (Preprint)

Yi Zhang,Xianggping Chen,Yuewen Lao,Xiaobin Qiu,Kang Liu,Yiyu Zhuang,Xiaoyan Gong,Ping Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.37249

2022-01-01

Abstract:UNSTRUCTURED Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of hand hygiene intelligent technology implementation in hospitals. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, VIP Database and CNIK from inception to October 2021. Two reviewers independently screened, selected and extracted data. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 and STATA 15.1 softwares. The systematic review protocol was registered. Results: 33 studies were included for review including 2 RCT and 31 quasi-experimental studies. 66.7% of studies published in the past 5 years. Compared with usual care, the intervention of hand hygiene intelligent technology improved hand hygiene compliance of health care workers (risk ratio= 1.64, 95% CI 1.50 to 1.74, p< .0001), reduced health care-associated infection rates (risk ratio= 0.25, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.33, p< .0001), and was not associated with multi-drug resistant organism detection rates (risk ratio= 0.53, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.04, p= 0.07). Three covariates of publish year, study design and intervention were not the factors to hand hygiene compliance or hospital-acquired infection rates analyzed by meta-regression. Sensitivity analysis showed stable results except the pooled outcome of multi-drug resistant organisms detection rates. The quality of three evidences indicated a lack of high-quality studies. Conclusions: Intelligent technology could be applied in the future as the essential way to improve hand hygiene. However, low quality of evidence and important heterogeneity were observed. Larger clinical trials needed to evaluate the impact of intelligent technology on multidrug-resistant organism detection rates and other clinical outcomes.
Effects of the Implementation of Intelligent Technology for Hand Hygiene in Hospitals: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Yi Zhang,Xiangping Chen,Yuewen Lao,Xiaobin Qiu,Kang Liu,Yiyu Zhuang,Xiaoyan Gong,Ping Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/37249

IF: 7.076

2023-01-01

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract:Background: The World Health Organization recommends regular hand hygiene monitoring and feedback to improve hand hygiene behaviors and health care-associated infection rates. Intelligent technologies for hand hygiene are increasingly being developed as alternative or supplemental monitoring approaches. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the effect of this type of intervention, with conflicting results in the literature. Objective: We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of using intelligent technology for hand hygiene in hospitals. Methods: We searched 7 databases from inception to December 31, 2022. Two reviewers independently and blindly selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 and STATA 15.1 software. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also conducted. Overall certainty of evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The systematic review protocol was registered. Results: The 36 studies comprised 2 randomized controlled trials and 34 quasi-experimental studies. The included intelligent technologies involved 5 functions: performance reminders,electronic counting and remote monitoring,data processing, feedback,and education. Compared with usual care, the intelligent technology intervention for hand hygiene improved health care workers' hand hygiene compliance (risk ratio 1.56, 95% CI 1.47-1.66; P<.001), reduced health care-associated infection rates (risk ratio 0.25, 95% CI 0.19-0.33; P<.001), and was not associated with multidrug-resistant organism detection rates (risk ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.27-1.04; P=.07). Three covariates, including publication year, study design, and intervention, were not factors of hand hygiene compliance or hospital-acquired infection rates analyzed by meta-regression. Sensitivity analysis showed stable results except for the pooled outcome of multidrug-resistant organism detection rates. The caliber of 3 pieces of evidence suggested a dearth of high-caliber research. Conclusions: Intelligent technologies for hand hygiene play an integral role in hospital. However, low quality of evidence and important heterogeneity were observed. Larger clinical trials are required to evaluate the impact of intelligent technology on multidrug-resistant organism detection rates and other clinical outcomes.
Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in patient care

Dinah J Gould,Donna Moralejo,Nicholas Drey,Jane H Chudleigh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005186.pub3

2010-09-08

Abstract:Background: Health care-associated infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Hand hygiene is regarded as an effective preventive measure. Objectives: To update the review done in 2007, to assess the short and longer-term success of strategies to improve hand hygiene compliance and to determine whether a sustained increase in hand hygiene compliance can reduce rates of health care-associated infection. Search strategy: We conducted electronic searches of: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group specialised register of trials; MEDLINE; PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; and the BNI. Originally searched to July 2006, for the update databases were searched from August 2006 until November 2009. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, controlled before and after studies, and interrupted time series analyses meeting explicit entry and quality criteria used by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group were eligible for inclusion. Studies reporting indicators of hand hygiene compliance and proxy indicators such as product use were considered. Self-reported data were not considered a valid measure of compliance. Studies to promote hand hygiene compliance as part of a care bundle approach were included, providing data relating specifically to hand hygiene were presented separately. Studies were excluded if hand hygiene was assessed in simulations, non-clinical settings or the operating theatre setting. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed data quality. Main results: Four studies met the criteria for the review: two from the original review and two from the update. Two studies evaluated simple education initiatives, one using a randomized clinical trial design and the other a controlled before and after design. Both measured hand hygiene compliance by direct observation. The other two studies were both interrupted times series studies. One study presented three separate interventions within the same paper: simple substitutions of product and two multifaceted campaigns, one of which included involving practitioners in making decisions about choice of hand hygiene products and the components of the hand hygiene program. The other study also presented two separate multifaceted campaigns, one of which involved application of social marketing theory. In these two studies follow-up data collection continued beyond twelve months, and a proxy measure of hand hygiene compliance (product use) was recorded. Microbiological data were recorded in one study. Hand hygiene compliance increased for one of the studies where it was measured by direct observation, but the results from the other study were not conclusive. Product use increased in the two studies in which it was reported, with inconsistent results reported for one initiative. MRSA incidence decreased in the one study reporting microbiological data. Authors' conclusions: The quality of intervention studies intended to increase hand hygiene compliance remains disappointing. Although multifaceted campaigns with social marketing or staff involvement appear to have an effect, there is insufficient evidence to draw a firm conclusion. There remains an urgent need to undertake methodologically robust research to explore the effectiveness of soundly designed and implemented interventions to increase hand hygiene compliance.
Interventions to improve healthcare workers’ hand hygiene compliance: A systematic review of systematic reviews

Lesley Price,Jennifer MacDonald,Lucyna Gozdzielewska,Tracey Howe,Paul Flowers,Lesley Shepherd,Yvonne Watt,Jacqui Reilly

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2018.262

2018-12-01

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

Abstract:Abstract Objective To synthesize the existing evidence base of systematic reviews of interventions to improve healthcare worker (HCW) hand hygiene compliance (HHC). Methods PRISMA guidelines were followed, and 10 information sources were searched in September 2017, with no limits to language or date of publication, and papers were screened against inclusion criteria for relevance. Data were extracted and risk of bias was assessed. Results Overall, 19 systematic reviews (n=20 articles) were included. Only 1 article had a low risk of bias. Moreover, 15 systematic reviews showed positive effects of interventions on HCW HHC, whereas 3 reviews evaluating monitoring technology did not. Findings regarding whether multimodal rather than single interventions are preferable were inconclusive. Targeting social influence, attitude, self-efficacy, and intention were associated with greater effectiveness. No clear link emerged between how educational interventions were delivered and effectiveness. Conclusions This is the first systematic review of systematic reviews of interventions to improve HCW HHC. The evidence is sufficient to recommend the implementation of interventions to improve HCW HHC (except for monitoring technology), but it is insufficient to make specific recommendations regarding the content or how the content should be delivered. Future research should rigorously apply behavior change theory, and recommendations should be clearly described with respect to intervention content and how it is delivered. Such recommendations should be tested for longer terms using stronger study designs with clearly defined outcomes.
Compared hand hygiene compliance among healthcare providers before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review and meta-analysis

Ying Wang,Jinru Yang,Fu Qiao,Bilong Feng,Fen Hu,Wenwen Wu,Li Liu,Yufeng Yuan,Zi-ang Xi,Zi-ling Ni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.030

IF: 4.303

2022-05-01

American Journal of Infection Control

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) is a cost-effective measure to reduce health care-associated infections. The overall characteristics and changes of hand hygiene compliance (HHC) among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic provided evidence for targeted HH intervention measures.AIM: To systematically review the literature and conduct a meta-analysis of studies investigating the rate of HHC and the characteristics of HH during the COVID-19 pandemic.METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and CBM databases were searched. All the original articles with valid HHC data among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic (from January 1, 2020 to October 1, 2021) were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a DerSimonian and Laird model to yield a point estimate and a 95% CI for the HHC rate. The heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics and a random-effects model was used to contrast between different occupations, the WHO 5-moments of HH and different observation methods. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed.FINDINGS: Seven studies with 2,377 health care providers reporting HHC were identified. The estimated overall HHC was 74%, which was higher than that reported in previous studies (5%-89%). Fever clinic has become a new key place for HHC observation. Nurses had the highest HHC (80%; 95% CI:74%-87%) while auxiliary workers (70%; 95%CI:62%-77%) had the lowest. For the WHO 5-moments, the health care providers had the highest HHC after contact with the body fluids of the patients (91%; 95% CI:88%-94%), while before contact with patient's health care providers had the lowest HHC (68%; 95% CI:62%-74%) which was consistent with before the pandemic. There existed great HHC differences among different monitoring methods (automatic monitoring system:53%; 95% CI:44%-63% versus openly and secretly observation: 91%; 95% CI: 90%-91%).CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the compliance of health care providers' HH showed a great improvement. The fever clinics have become the focused departments for HH monitoring. The HHC of auxiliary workers and the HH opportunity for "before contact with patients" should be strengthened. In the future, it will be necessary to develop standardized HH monitoring tools for practical work.

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
Hand hygiene compliance among health care workers in a hospital

Ying-ying HU,Xiao-cheng CHEN,Zong-ming LIU,Yu-rong GAO,Wei-qi WANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9638.2015.05.014

2015-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate hand hygiene status of health care workers (HCWs)in a hospital,and pro-vide guides for improving hand hygiene compliance.Methods Hand hygiene intervention was adopted in a hospital between 2012 and 2014,hand hygiene compliance among HCWs and healthcare-associated infection in patients be-tween August 1 and August 31 of each year were investigated and analyzed statistically.Results In 2102 -2014, hand hygiene compliance rate of HCWs was 59.55%,62.13%,and 65.16% respectively,which showed a increased trend (χ2 =10.018,P =0.002),HAI rate was 2.13%,1 .48% and 1 .06% respectively,which showed a decreased trend (χ2 =82.377,P <0.001 );hand hygiene compliance rate of doctors was lower than nurses (57.97% vs 65.97%);Of different hand hygiene moments,hand hygiene compliance rate was the lowest before touching a pa-tient(41 .32%),and highest after body fluid exposure (76.47%).Conclusion Comprehensive hand hygiene inter-vention in this hospital has achieved preliminary results,improvement of HCWs’hand compliance is helpful for pre-venting HAI.
Impact of COVID-19 on the degree of compliance with hand hygiene: a repeated cross-sectional study

Maria Guerrero-Soler,Paula Gras-Valentí,Isel Lilibeth Gómez-Sotero,Guillermo Platas-Abenza,Raissa de Fátima Silva-Afonso,Carmen-María Benito-Miralles,Marina Fuster-Pérez,Lidia Cartagena-Llopis,María Sánchez-Valero,José Sánchez-Payá,Pablo Chico-Sánchez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268824000505

2024-04-01

Abstract:Hand hygiene (HH) is the paramount measure used to prevent healthcare-associated infections. A repeated cross-sectional study was undertaken with direct observation of the degree of compliance on HH of healthcare personnel during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Between, 2018-2019, 9,083 HH opportunities were considered, and 5,821 in 2020-2022. Chi squared tests were used to identify associations. The crude and adjusted odds ratios were used along with a logistic regression model for statistical analyses. Compliance on HH increased significantly (p < 0.001) from 54.5% (95% CI: 53.5, 55.5) to 70.1% (95% CI: 68.9, 71.2) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase was observed in four of the five key moments of HH established by the World Health Organization (WHO) (p < 0.05), except at moment 4. The factors that were significantly and independently associated with compliance were the time period considered, type of healthcare-personnel, attendance at training sessions, knowledge of HH and WHO guidelines, and availability of hand disinfectant alcoholic solution in pocket format. Highest HH compliance occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, reflecting a positive change in healthcare-personnel's behaviour regarding HH recommendations.
Effectiveness of hand hygiene campaigns and interventions across the League of Arab states: A region-wide scoping review

Basil H. Aboul-Enein,Patricia J. Kelly,Sudha Raddi,Teresa Keller,Fatmah Almoayad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.02.022

IF: 8.944

2024-03-18

Journal of Hospital Infection

Abstract:Summary Hand hygiene is a standard public health practice for limiting the spread of infectious diseases, yet they are still not routine global health behaviors. This review aimed to examine the effectiveness of various hand hygiene interventions conducted across the League of Arab states, identify gaps in the existing literature, and propose areas for future research and intervention development. A scoping review was conducted across 16 databases for relevant publications published up to and including October 2023. Forty studies met the inclusion criteria; of these 34 were hospital-based and six community-based. Of the reviewed studies, 24 provided adequate details that would enable replication of their intervention. Eighteen of the studies used some variation of the World Health Organization's Five Moments for intervention content or assessment. More than half (n=25) reported health care worker or student hand hygiene behaviors as an outcome and fifteen studies also included some form of patient-centered outcomes. Six studies specified the use of theory or framework for their evaluation design or intervention content, and four studies mentioned use of local government guidelines or recommendations. Future research should focus on bridging the literature gaps by emphasizing community-based studies and integrating cultural nuances into intervention designs. Additionally, applying theoretical frameworks to hand hygiene studies could enhance understanding and effectiveness, ensuring sustainable improvements in hygiene practices across diverse settings in the Arab League states.

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
Bilateral cervical chondrocutaneous remnants: a case report and review of the literature.

H. Oztürk,T. Ozdemir,S. Demirbağ,C. Atabek,İ. Sürer,M. Safali,S. Çetinkurşun

2006-04-01

Abstract:Cervical chondrocutaneous remnants are less common lesions, which are encountered at the lateral neck. They are similar in appearance to preauricular tags, which are more frequent. Bilateral appearance of this pathology is quite uncommon. The lesions always present at birth, and are located in the middle or lower third of the lateral neck with a significant prevalence of location anterior to the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The overlying skin is similar to the surrounding neck skin and the lesion is painless, lacking any inflammation or discharge. Surgically there is no connection with deep underlying structures. The therapy of choice should be complete surgical removal. Several associated anomalies may accompany cervical chondrocutaneous remnants. Thus these patients must be evaluated carefully in order to detect any additional anomaly. We herein report a four-year-old patient with bilateral cervical chondrocutaneous remnant located at the inferior third of the lateral neck anterior to the sternocleidomastoid muscle. We also review the literature for patients with bilateral cervical chondrocutaneous remnants and discuss embryologic and diagnostic aspects.
Assessment of Fidelity in Interventions to Improve Hand Hygiene of Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review

Jackson S. Musuuza,Anna Barker,Caitlyn Ngam,Lia Vellardita,Nasia Safdar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2015.341

2016-02-10

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

Abstract:OBJECTIVE Compliance with hand hygiene in healthcare workers is fundamental to infection prevention yet remains a challenge to sustain. We examined fidelity reporting in interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance, and we assessed 5 measures of intervention fidelity: (1) adherence, (2) exposure or dose, (3) quality of intervention delivery, (4) participant responsiveness, and (5) program differentiation. DESIGN Systematic review METHODS A librarian performed searches of the literature in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, and Web of Science of material published prior to June 19, 2015. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, and assessment of study quality was conducted for each study reviewed. RESULTS A total of 100 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only 8 of these 100 studies reported all 5 measures of intervention fidelity. In addition, 39 of 100 (39%) failed to include at least 3 fidelity measures; 20 of 100 (20%) failed to include 4 measures; 17 of 100 (17%) failed to include 2 measures, while 16 of 100 (16%) of the studies failed to include at least 1 measure of fidelity. Participant responsiveness and adherence to the intervention were the most frequently unreported fidelity measures, while quality of the delivery was the most frequently reported measure. CONCLUSIONS Almost all hand hygiene intervention studies failed to report at least 1 fidelity measurement. To facilitate replication and effective implementation, reporting fidelity should be standard practice when describing results of complex behavioral interventions such as hand hygiene. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:567–575

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
Hand Hygiene Auditing: Is It a Roadway to Improve Adherence to Hand Hygiene Among Hospital Personnel?

Vithiya Ganesan,Raja Sundaramurthy,Rajendran Thiruvanamalai,Monica Raghavan,Sunil Kumar D Chavan,Rajeshwari Pusa,Varatharajan Sakthivadivel,Archana Gaur,Yuvaraj Balan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25221

2022-05-22

Cureus

Abstract:Background Over the years, there has been an increase in hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) among patients in India. One of the main reasons is a lack of compliance with infection control guidelines, such as hand hygiene. So the present study was conducted to determine the compliance of hand hygiene among healthcare workers in a private tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. Materials and methods The prospective observational study was carried out between April 2017 and March 2020. Nineteen areas were directly observed for hand hygiene (HH) compliance. At each location, HH audit was conducted for one hour per day for five days per month. HH complete adherence rate (HHCAR) and HH partial adherence rate (HHPAR) were analyzed. Results Nine hundred and twenty observation periods were completed during the entire study period. Overall, hand hygiene complete adherence rate was 29.9% (11,981/39,998); partial adherence rate was 45.3% (18,131/39,998) and the non-adherence rate was 24.7% (9886/39,998). A better adherence rate was seen among nurses (44.7%), followed by other staff (33.7%) and doctors (33.04%). Moment-specific adherence rates show almost equal adherence rates of 50.7%, 50.75%, and 50.1%, respectively, for moments 2, 3, and 4, and comparatively low for moments 1 and 5 (48.4% and 47.6%, respectively). Conclusion Despite adequate hand hygiene facilities, compliance remains low. Hand hygiene is a bundle care approach that needs to consider factors including healthcare staff, clinical, institutional, environmental, and behavioral changes. Multimodal interventions and multidisciplinary commitment are mandatory for sustained compliance.
Improving hand hygiene compliance in health care workers: Strategies and impact on patient outcomes

Xiaoyan Song,David C. Stockwell,Tara Floyd,Billie L. Short,Nalini Singh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.01.031

IF: 4.303

2013-10-01

American Journal of Infection Control

Abstract:BACKGROUND: We described a systematic process for improving hand hygiene (HH) compliance in health care providers and assessed the impact of HH on patient outcomes.METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between July 2008 and September 2011 in a children's hospital. We employed failure mode effectiveness analysis to identify barriers for complying with HH requirements and instituted improvement measures. We conducted a subanalysis using methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) acquisition data and HH compliance data collected in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to demonstrate the impact of HH on patient outcomes.RESULTS: The overall HH compliance rate increased from 50.3% preintervention (July 2008-September 2008) to 84.0% postintervention (January 2009-September 2011) (relative risk [RR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-1.9). Compliance among physicians and nurses increased from 48.6% to 87.0% (RR, 1.4; 95% CI: 1.3-1.6) and from 46.5% to 77.9% (RR, 1.3; 95% CI: 1.2-1.4), respectively. Sustaining HH at 80% or higher was associated with a 48% further reduction of MRSA acquisition (incident rate ratio, -0.52; 95% CI: -0.31 to -0.90) in a unit that had comprehensive MRSA prevention measures. This reduction represents the prevention of 1.3 MRSA acquisitions per month, resulting in a saving of 11.6 NICU-days and $66,397 hospital charges.CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the utility of failure mode effectiveness analysis to improve staff HH and suggested HH as a potential cost-effective means for preventing MRSA in hospitals.

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
Hand hygiene compliance of respiratory physiotherapists: An analysis of trends over eight years including the COVID-19 pandemic period

Rimjhim Kanaujia,Manisha Biswal,Kulbeer Kaur,Harpreet Kaur,Rupinder Kaur,Harinder Kaur,Manjinder Kaur,Pankaj Arora,Navneet Dhaliwal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100646

Abstract:Background: Respiratory physiotherapists (RPs) are an integral part of healthcare workers delivering care to intubated patients. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of awareness campaigns on hand hygiene (HH) compliance among RPs. Method: An observational single-center study was conducted between 2015 and 2022 in different ICU types in both adult and paediatric settings. The hand hygiene compliance rates were monitored prospectively and the quality improvement interventions included various hand hygiene campaigns and awareness sessions with RPs. Compliance was calculated as a percentage of events over total opportunities observed. Results: There was a significant increase in compliance rates for all five moments of HH (p-value: <0.05). Overall, mean compliance rate in ICUs was significantly higher than wards for Moment 1 (p-value: 0.0045), Moment 4 (p-value: 0.0372) and Moment 5 (p-value: 0.0036) by 24.2%, 22.7% and 21.5% respectively. Also, paediatric ICUs had higher HH compliance than adult ICUs for Moment 1 (87.5% vs 61.1%; p-value: 0.0459) and Moment 4 (93.7% vs 79.3%; p-value: 0.0255). A significant increase in HH compliance was observed in post-COVID-19 period compared to pre-COVID-19 period with respect to Moment 1, 2 and 5. Conclusion: This study adds to the almost non-existent literature on this important category of healthcare workers working in respiratory ICUs. Our results project an increase compliance after the HH awareness programmes over the years among RP which is critical to prevent spread infection by multidrug resistant organisms among the hospitals.
Current status of hand hygiene practices among primary healthcare workers and its influencing factors

WANG Xiaoqi,XU Shuangfei,MAO Yuhua,WANG Weibing,ZHONG Peisong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2024.23307

2024-01-01

Abstract:[Objective]To investigate the current status and influencing factors of hand hygiene practices among primary healthcare workers,and to provide a reference for improving hand hygiene behavior in primary healthcare institutions.[Methods]A self-designed questionnaire was used to conduct a survey among medical staff of seven community health service centers in Jiading District,Shanghai,using a cluster random sampling method.The data collected were subjected to descriptive statistics,reliability and validity tests,correlation analysis,and structural equation model fitting.[Results]A statistical difference in hand hygiene compliance was found among medical staff with varying occupational types and educational levels(P<0.05),and medical staff in clinical departments exhibited higher levels of hand hygiene compliance(P<0.05).In the health belief model,among the core variables,healthcare workers'perceived benefits,perceived barriers,and self-efficacy had a direct impact on hand hygiene behavior,with direct effect values of 0.341,-0.152,and 0.234,respectively.Meanwhile,cues to action and perceived severity of COVID-19 infection indirectly affected hand hygiene behavior,with an indirect effect value of 0.066 and 0.062,respectively.[Conclusion]Healthcare workers generally exhibit a high degree of hand hygiene compliance,but there are variations in hand hygiene scores among healthcare workers with different characteristics.Enhancing healthcare worders'perception of benefits,action cues,and self-efficacy while reducing perceived barriers can effectively improve their hand hygiene behavior.
The efficacy of an integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique on upper trapezius trigger points in subjects with non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

A. V. Nagrale,Paul E Glynn,Aakanksha Joshi,G. Ramteke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/106698110X12595770849605

2010-03-01

Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy

Abstract:Abstract Currently, large levels of practice variability exist regarding the clinical deactivation of trigger points. Manual physical therapy has been identified as a potential means of resolving active trigger points; however, to date the ideal treatment approach has yet to be elucidated. The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effects of two manual treatment regimens on individuals with upper trapezius trigger points. Sixty patients, 19–38 years of age with non-specific neck pain and upper trapezius trigger points, were randomized into one of two, 4 week physical therapy programs. One group received muscle energy techniques while the second group received an integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique (INIT) consisting of muscle energy techniques, ischemic compression, and strain–counterstrain (SCS). Outcomes including a visual analog pain scale (VAS), the neck disability index (NDI), and lateral cervical flexion range of motion (ROM) were collected at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks after the initiation of therapy. Results revealed large pre–post-effect sizes within the INIT group (Cohen's d = 0.97, 0.94 and 0.97). Additionally, significantly greater improvements in pain and neck disability and lateral cervical flexion ROM were detected in favor of the INIT group (0.29–0.57, 0.57–1.12 and 0.29–0.57) at a 95% CI respectively. The findings of this study indicate the potential benefit of an integrated approach in deactivating upper trapezius trigger points. Further research should be performed to investigate the long-term benefits of the current treatment approach.
Knowledge, awareness and practice of hand hygiene among healthcare workers for the prevention of infection: A cross-sectional study

Namrata Gaur,DushyantSingh Gaur,Dushyant Singh Gaur

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JME.JME_64_22

2023-08-10

Journal of Medical Evidence

Abstract:Background: Hand hygiene protocols, if followed stringently reduce the possibility of the spread of infection from healthcare workers (HCWs) to patients, to almost 99%. However, in actual practice, compliance of these protocols is poor. Aims: (1) To observe the practice of hand hygiene among HCWs and (2) assess knowledge and awareness regarding hand hygiene protocol and identify the factors hampering its effective practice. Prospective observational study at an multispeciality hospital. Patients and Methods: Consultants, junior doctors, nursing in-charges and nurses and ancillary staff like ward attendants, ward secretaries, housekeeping staff and lift operators were (1) Observed during their hand hygiene practice and (2) 200 of these HCWs were provided a written questionnaire, in order to assess their depth of hand hygiene knowledge. Data were studied and analysed. Results: Female HCWs, right from consultants to ward attendants and ancillary workers showed better knowledge and compliance with hand hygiene practices. The junior nurses, interns and junior residents were more compliant with hand hygiene procedures in comparison to consultants and in-charge nurses. Hand hygiene compliance was poor in outpatient department, particularly on days with heavy workloads. Lack of knowledge regarding hand hygiene was observed amongst ancillary staff. Conclusions: The study emphasised stringent compliance and constant re-enforcement of protocol of correct hand hygiene practice amongst HCWs including ancillary staff.
Evaluation of compliance to the World Health Organization's five moments of hand hygiene: Cross-sectional observation of healthcare professionals

Thabiso L A Bale,Tendani S Ramukumba,Lutendo S Mudau

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v36i1.255

2021-07-26

Abstract:Background: Human hands are home to thousands of microorganisms, which may be transmitted to surfaces that the hands come into contact with. When in contact with people who are ailing or have weakened immune systems, some of these microorganisms can cause infections and disease. Correct hand hygiene goes a long way in eradicating these potentially infective microorganisms and forms the cornerstone of infection prevention and control (IPC) within healthcare facilities and beyond. The healthcare industry is constantly challenged by healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and their negative effects on patient safety and clinical outcomes. Hospitals in Pretoria are facing similar challenges posed by HAIs and there is no report available on compliance of healthcare professionals (HCPs) to the World Health Organization's (WHO) 'five moments of hand hygiene'. Healthcare professional's compliance to all of the five moments of hand hygiene, particularly within the patient zone, is crucial in mitigating and reducing the spread of contact-based infections in the healthcare setting. Methods: A quantitative longitudinal design was used in a covert direct observation of HCP compliance to the WHO's five moments of hand hygiene. The observations were conducted over 4 weeks in three hospitals, covering 25 wards, inclusive of four adult critical care units using the WHO's 'five moments of hand hygiene' observation form. Results: A total of 1906 hand hygiene opportunities were directly observed in three hospitals. Hand hygiene compliance was 17.26% (n = 329). Allied health professionals had higher compliance (23.02%) than medical (19.26%) and nursing professionals (15.76%). The moment before patient contact had the lowest compliance (8.21%) as compared with all other moments. Conclusions: In general, HCPs had low compliance to the five moments of hand hygiene within the patient zone. Allied health professionals had higher compliance than medical and nursing professionals. Compliance in public hospitals was lower than in private hospitals. Critical care units had higher compliance compared to general wards. Healthcare professionals better complied to the moments meant for their safety as compared to those indicated for patient safety.
Impact of a hospital-wide hand hygiene initiative on healthcare-associated infections: results of an interrupted time series

Kathryn B Kirkland,Karen A Homa,Rosalind A Lasky,Judy A Ptak,Eileen A Taylor,Mark E Splaine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000800

2012-07-21

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Evidence that hand hygiene (HH) reduces healthcare-associated infections has been available for almost two centuries. Yet HH compliance among healthcare professionals continues to be low, and most efforts to improve it have failed.OBJECTIVE: To improve healthcare workers' HH, and reduce healthcare-associated infections.DESIGN: 3-year interrupted time series with multiple sequential interventions and 1-year post-intervention follow-up.SETTING: Teaching hospital in rural New Hampshire.INTERVENTIONS: In five categories: (1) leadership/accountability; (2) measurement/feedback; (3) hand sanitiser availability; (4) education/training; and (5) marketing/communication.MEASUREMENT: Monthly changes in observed HH compliance (%) and rates of healthcare-associated infection (including Staphylococcus aureus infections, Clostridium difficile infections and bloodstream infections) per 1000 inpatient days. The subset of S aureus infections attributable to the operating room served as a tracer condition. We used statistical process control charts to identify significant changes.RESULTS: HH compliance increased significantly from 41% to 87% (p<0.01) during the initiative, and improved further to 91% (p<0.01) the following year. Nurses achieved higher HH compliance (93%) than physicians (78%). There was a significant, sustained decline in the healthcare-associated infection rate from 4.8 to 3.3 (p<0.01) per 1000 inpatient days. The rate of S aureus infections attributable to the operating room rose, while the rate of other S aureus infections fell.CONCLUSIONS: Our initiative was associated with a large and significant hospital-wide improvement in HH which was sustained through the following year and a significant, sustained reduction in the incidence of healthcare-associated infection. The observed increased incidence of the tracer condition supports the assertion that HH improvement contributed to infection reduction. Persistent variation in HH performance among different groups requires further study.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Patient experiences of partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance: a systematic review

Samantha Butenko,Craig Lockwood,Alexa McArthur

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003001

Abstract:Background: Healthcare-associated infections pose a significant risk to patients in acute healthcare settings such as hospitals. Increasingly, patients are encouraged to be active participants and partner with healthcare professionals to positively influence their own safety and overall experience throughout their healthcare journey. Patient-focused safety initiatives include the empowerment of patients to be active partners with healthcare professionals in order to influence the hand hygiene behaviors and compliance of the healthcare professionals providing care to them. Partnering within the context of healthcare, and between the patient and healthcare professional, can be considered as a general concept that involves the empowerment of patients to participate in their care. Terms used to describe patient partnering within healthcare vary and include patient participation, patient-centeredness, patient empowerment and patient engagement. Although patients appear generally to have positive attitudes and intentions about engaging in their safety and partnering in the healthcare setting, their intentions and actual behaviors vary considerably. Patients appear less likely to engage in behaviors that require questioning of the perceived or real authority of healthcare professionals. A patient's intention and subsequent act of partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance by the healthcare professional are influenced by complex internal, external and social factors as well as cultural, behavioral and systematic factors. Objectives: To determine the best available evidence in relation to the experiences of the patient partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance. Inclusion criteria types of participants: The current review considered qualitative (critical or interpretive) papers that included adult in-patients and healthcare professionals (medical and nursing staff), in the acute hospital-care setting. Adult was considered to be any person aged 18 years or over. It should be noted that consumers in this context were patients and vice versa; the term patient is therefore used throughout this report for consistency. Phenomena of interest: The current review considered studies that investigated the experience of partnership between patients and healthcare professionals in relation to hand hygiene compliance. This review investigated the phenomena of partnering from both the perspectives of the patient and the healthcare professional. Types of studies: The current review considered studies that focused on qualitative data including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research and feminist research. As qualitative studies were identified and on appraisal found to be of sufficient quality for inclusion, this review did not seek alternate forms of evidence such as text and opinion. Search strategy: The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies from 1990 to May 2015. Studies published in English were considered for inclusion in this review. Methodological quality: Qualitative papers selected for retrieval were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI). Data extraction: Qualitative data were extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-QARI. Data synthesis: Qualitative research findings were pooled using JBI-QARI. Results: Following the systematic search and critical appraisal process, three studies were included in the review for data extraction and synthesis of findings. The review process resulted in 29 study findings that were aggregated into seven categories. The categories generated two meta-synthesized findings. The two final synthesized findings were as follows. Synthesized finding 1: Organizational structures enable partnering between healthcare professionals and patients for hand hygiene compliance; however, the culture, beliefs and behaviors of healthcare professionals and patients do not fully support this partnership. Synthesized finding 2: Patients have differing levels of knowledge and balance partnering in hand hygiene against possible detrimental impacts on the caring relationship provided by healthcare professionals, out of concern for their own wellbeing, health outcomes, treatment and/or recovery. Conclusion: The current review highlights the complexity of the patient's experience of partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance. The experiences reported indicated that there is a possible disparity between the healthcare facility and healthcare professionals' promotion and intention of partnering for hand hygiene compliance, and the actual patient's acceptance, participation, partnership, experience and implementation of this initiative. This disconnect between intent and action appears to be influenced by a number of factors including organizational structures as well as drivers such as cultural beliefs and behavior.
Not only COVID-19: a systematic review of anti-COVID-19 measures and their effect on health care-associated infections

Fausto Ciccacci,Carolina De Santo,Claudia Mosconi,Stefano Orlando,Mariachiara Carestia,Luca Guarenti,Giuseppe Liotta,Leonardo Palombi,Leonardo Emberti Gialloreti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.02.008

IF: 8.944

2024-02-29

Journal of Hospital Infection

Abstract:Background Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) burden healthcare globally. Amid the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, intensified infection control measures, such as mask usage and hand hygiene, were implemented. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of these measures in preventing HCAIs among hospitalized patients. Methods Using the PICO framework, the study focused on hospitalized patients and the effectiveness of anti-COVID-19 measures in preventing HCAIs. A systematic review of literature published in 2020-2021-2022 was conducted, examining interventions such as mask usage, hand hygiene, and environmental cleaning. Results This systematic review analyzed 42 studies: 2 in 2020, 21 in 2021 and 19 in 2022. Most studies were from high-income countries (28). Most studies (30 out of 42) reported a reduction in HCAIs after implementing anti-COVID-19 measures Gastrointestinal infections and respiratory tract infections showed significant reduction unlike bloodstream infections and urinary tract infections. Some wards, like cardiology and neurology, experienced reduced HCAIs, unlike intensive care units and coronary care units. We observed an increase in studies reporting no effect of hygiene measures on HCAIs in 2022, eventually indicating a shift in effectiveness over time. Discussion Anti-COVID-19 measures have shown selective efficacy in preventing HCAIs. The study emphasizes the need for context-specific strategies and increased focus on regions with limited resources. Continued research is essential to refine infection control practices, especially in high-risk settings.

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health

[Cardiac and metabolic beta-adrenergic receptor blockade by pindolol in man].

Effects of Hand Hygiene Intelligent Technology Implementation in Hospitals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (Preprint)

Effects of the Implementation of Intelligent Technology for Hand Hygiene in Hospitals: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in patient care

Interventions to improve healthcare workers’ hand hygiene compliance: A systematic review of systematic reviews

Compared hand hygiene compliance among healthcare providers before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review and meta-analysis

Hand hygiene compliance among health care workers in a hospital

Impact of COVID-19 on the degree of compliance with hand hygiene: a repeated cross-sectional study

Effectiveness of hand hygiene campaigns and interventions across the League of Arab states: A region-wide scoping review

Bilateral cervical chondrocutaneous remnants: a case report and review of the literature.

Assessment of Fidelity in Interventions to Improve Hand Hygiene of Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review

Hand Hygiene Auditing: Is It a Roadway to Improve Adherence to Hand Hygiene Among Hospital Personnel?

Improving hand hygiene compliance in health care workers: Strategies and impact on patient outcomes

Hand hygiene compliance of respiratory physiotherapists: An analysis of trends over eight years including the COVID-19 pandemic period

Current status of hand hygiene practices among primary healthcare workers and its influencing factors

The efficacy of an integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique on upper trapezius trigger points in subjects with non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Knowledge, awareness and practice of hand hygiene among healthcare workers for the prevention of infection: A cross-sectional study

Evaluation of compliance to the World Health Organization's five moments of hand hygiene: Cross-sectional observation of healthcare professionals

Impact of a hospital-wide hand hygiene initiative on healthcare-associated infections: results of an interrupted time series

Patient experiences of partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance: a systematic review

Not only COVID-19: a systematic review of anti-COVID-19 measures and their effect on health care-associated infections