Population-level risk factors related to measles case fatality: a conceptual framework and systematic review of evidence
Sbarra,A. N.,Jit,M.,Mosser,J. F.,Ferrari,M.,Cutts,F.,Papania,M.,Kretsinger,K.,McCarthy,K. A.,Thakkar,N.,Gaythorpe,K. A. M.,Gamage,D.,Krause,L. K.,Dansereau,E.,Portnoy,A.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.30.22280585
2022-10-03
MedRxiv
Abstract:Introduction: A better understanding of population-level factors related to measles case fatality is needed to estimate measles mortality burden and impact of interventions such as vaccination. This study aimed to develop a conceptual framework of mechanisms associated with measles case fatality ratios (CFRs) and assess the scope of evidence available for related indicators in the published literature. Methods: Following expert consultation, we constructed a conceptual framework of mechanisms associated with measles CFR and listed population-level indicators potentially associated with each mechanism. We also conducted a systematic literature review to determine and classify the scope of evidence for the listed indicators. Results: Five mechanisms were included in the conceptual framework: health system access and care-seeking behaviors, health system quality, measles control and epidemiology, nutritional status, and risk of secondary infection. Thirty-seven measurable population-level indicators were chosen as proxies for the mechanisms. We found studies showing a significant association with CFR for 15 indicators and non-significant associations only for 5 indicators. Inadequate data were available to evaluate the remaining 17 indicators. A randomized controlled trial provided evidence for a relationship between vitamin A treatment and measles CFR. Average household size, educational attainment, first-dose coverage of measles-containing vaccine, human immunodeficiency virus prevalence, second-dose coverage of measles-containing vaccine, stunting prevalence, surrounding conflict, travel time to major city or settlement, travel time to nearest health care facility, under-five mortality rate, underweight prevalence, vitamin A deficiency prevalence, and wasting prevalence had quantitative observational level evidence. Level of care available had qualitative evidence of a relationship with measles CFR. Conclusion: To reduce uncertainty in measles CFR estimation, population-level factors representative of underlying mechanisms associated with CFR could be used. Our study provides additional insights and a summary of the available evidence of these underlying mechanisms and indicators that could inform future estimations of measles CFR.