Abstract:Background Motion induced image artifacts have been the focus of many investigations for x‐ray computed tomography (CT). Methodologies of combating patient motion include the use of gating devices to optimize the data acquisition, reduction in patient scan time via faster gantry rotation and large detector coverage, and the development of advanced reconstruction and post‐processing algorithms to minimize motion artifacts. Purpose Previously proposed approaches are generally "global" in nature in that motion is characterized for the entire image. It is well known, however, that the presence of motion artifact in a CT image is highly nonuniform. When there is a lack of automated and quantitative local measure indicating the presence and the severity of motion artifacts in a local region, the quality of the reconstructed images depends heavily on the CT operator's rigor and experience. Even when an operator is informed of the presence of motion, little information is provided about the nature of the motion artifact to understand its relevance to the clinical task at hand. In this paper, we propose an image‐space spatial‐ and temporal‐consistency metric (CM) to detect and characterize the local motion. Method In a non‐rigid human organ, such as the lung, there are many small and rigid objects (target objects), such as blood vessels and nodules, distributed throughout the organ. If motion can be characterized for these target objects, we obtain a complete motion map for the organ. To accomplish this, a preliminary image reconstruction is carried out to identify the target objects and establish region‐of‐interests for consistency‐metric calculation. The CM is then obtained based on the backprojected intensity difference between the object region and its circular background. For a stationary object, the accumulation of this quantity over views is linear. When a target object moves, nonlinear behavior exhibits and a quantitative measure of linearity indicates the severity of motion. Results Extensive computer simulation was utilized to confirm the validity of the theory. These tests stress the sensitivity of the proposed CM to the target object size, object shape, in‐plane motion, cross‐plane motion, cone‐beam effect, and complex background. Results confirm that the proposed approach is robust under different testing conditions. The proposed CM is further validated using a cardiac scan of a swine, and the proposed CM correlates well with the visual inspection of the artifact in the reconstructed images. Conclusions In this paper, we have demonstrated the efficacy of the proposed CM for motion detection. Unlike previously proposed approaches where the consistency condition is derived for the entire image or the entire imaging volume, the proposed metric is well localized so that different zones in a patient anatomy can be individually characterized. In addition, the proposed CM provides a quantitative measure on a view‐by‐view basis so that the severity of motion is consistently estimated over time. Such information can be used to optimize the image reconstruction process and minimize the motion artifact.

Motion Artifact Reduction in Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Energy Mammography - A Multireader Study about the Effect of Nonrigid Registration as Motion Correction on Image Quality

The effect of motion correction on pharmacokinetic parameter estimation in dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI

Breathing motion compensation in chest tomosynthesis: evaluation of the effect on image quality and presence of artifacts

Motion correction of 3D dynamic contrast‐enhanced ultrasound imaging without anatomical B‐Mode images: Pilot evaluation in eight patients

Deformable registration with intensity correction for CESM monitoring response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

A motion correction approach for oral and maxillofacial cone-beam CT imaging

Effectuality study of a 3D motion correction algorithm in C-arm CTs of severely impaired image quality during transarterial chemoembolization

A Motion Compensation Approach for Oral and Maxillofacial Cone-beam Imaging

Diagnostic Accuracy and Incremental Value of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared With Full Field Digital Mammography in a Tertiary Cancer Care Center

Motion Effect Reduction Using High Performance Combined Registration in PET/CT Image Fusion

Spatial and temporal motion characterization for x‐ray CT

Motion Correction via Locally Linear Embedding for Helical Photon-counting CT

Evaluation of the Accuracy and Robustness of a Motion Correction Algorithm for PET Using a Novel Phantom Approach

Evaluating the impact of delayed-phase imaging in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography on breast cancer staging: A comparative study of abbreviated versus complete protocol

Automated quality control analysis for American College of Radiology (ACR) digital mammography (DM) phantom images

Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography

Motion correction of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the liver

Image Registration of 18F-FDG PET/CT Using the MotionFree Algorithm and CT Protocols through Phantom Study and Clinical Evaluation

Factors Influencing Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Images

Evaluation of a prototype metal artifact reduction algorithm for cone beam CT in patients undergoing radioembolization

Efficacy of the CALM® Algorithm in Reducing Motion-Induced Artifacts in CBCT Imaging: A Fractal Dimension Analysis of Trabecular Bone