Abstract:Abstract BackgroundMucosal and systemic immune responses are different strategies to cope with environmental stimuli. In ovo delivery of prebiotic, probiotic, or synbiotic into the avian embryo allows for indigenous microbiota stimulation. Intestinal microbiota in animals is responsible for immune system maturation. The genetic component is critical in host-microbiota crosstalk and immune system development. The goal of this study was to compare mucosal and systemic immune responses in two distinct chicken genotypes stimulated in ovo . ResultsThe experiment was constructed in full-factorial design and was aimed to study the effects of two chicken genotypes (chicken broilers or native chickens), four in ovo -delivered compounds (GOS/galactooligosaccharides/prebiotic, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris /probiotic, or GOS+ L.lactis /synbiotic, vs. physiological saline) and three different stimuli (LPS or LTA vs. physiological saline) on a panel of cytokine genes ( IL-1B , IL-2 , IL-4 , IL-6 , IL-10 , IL-12p40 , and IL-17 ) expressed in caecal tonsils and spleen. We tested significance of the main effects and their interactions. Genotype had the most significant influence on all gene expression signatures in both tissues ( P < 0.001 for all genes, except P < 0.05 for IL-10 in spleen). Immune challenge was the second most significant main effect, and influenced IL-1β , IL-6 IL-10 ( P < 0.001), and IL-17 genes ( P < 0.05) in caecal tonsils, and all genes in spleen ( P < 0.001), except IL-4 ( P > 0.05). In ovo stimulation influenced IL-2 , IL-4 , and IL-10 in caecal tonsils ( P < 0.05), as well as IL-2 and IL-12p40 in spleen ( P < 0.05). ConclusionsThe mucosal and systemic immune responses of chicken broilers and native chickens showed distinct patterns. Genotype influenced gene expression signatures of all immune-related genes, but chicken broilers developed stronger immune responses than native chickens. LPS triggered both mucosal (caecal tonsils) and systemic (spleen) immune responses in chicken broilers, but only systemic (spleen) in native chickens. In ovo stimulation with bioactive compounds (especially prebiotic) modulated innate immune responses to LPS. GOS delivered in ovo induced the most pronounced responses to LPS, which validated its further application as a potent immunomodulator for in ovo applications.

Molecular Response in Intestinal and Immune Tissues to in Ovo Administration of Inulin and the Combination of Inulin and Lactobacillus lactis Subsp. cremoris

Effects of <i>Clostridium butyricum</i>- and <i>Bacillus</i> spp.-Based Potential Probiotics on the Growth Performance, Intestinal Morphology, Immune Responses, and Caecal Microbiota in Broilers

Synbiotics for Broiler Chickens—In Vitro Design and Evaluation of the Influence on Host and Selected Microbiota Populations following In Ovo Delivery

Mucosal and Systemic Immune Responses Modulated by in Ovo-Delivered Bioactive Compounds in Distinct Chicken Genotypes

Impact of in ovo administration of xylo- and mannooligosaccharides on broiler chicken gut health

Immune-Related Gene Expression Responses to In Ovo Stimulation and LPS Challenge in Two Distinct Chicken Genotypes

Modulation of gene expression in immune-related organs by in ovo stimulation with probiotics and prophybiotics in broiler chickens

Metabolic Gene Expression in the Muscle and Blood Parameters of Broiler Chickens Stimulated In Ovo with Synbiotics

The impact of synbiotic administration through in ovo technology on the microstructure of a broiler chicken small intestine tissue on the 1st and 42nd day of rearing

Effects of Selected Prebiotics or Synbiotics Administered in ovo on Lymphocyte Subsets in Bursa of the Fabricius, Thymus, and Spleen in Non-Immunized and Immunized Chicken Broilers

Early Inoculation with Caecal Fermentation Broth Alters Small Intestine Morphology,gene Expression of Tight Junction Proteins in the Ileum, and the Caecal Metabolomic Profiling of Broilers

The Effects of In Ovo Injection of Synbiotics on the Early Growth Performance and Intestinal Health of Chicks

Effects of Prebiotics and Synbiotics Delivered In Ovo on Broiler Small Intestine Histomorphology During the First Days After Hatching

Hatchery and Dietary Application of Synbiotics in Broilers: Performance and mRNA Abundance of Ileum Tight Junction Proteins, Nutrient Transporters, and Immune Response Markers

Proteome changes upon in ovo stimulation with Lactobacillus synbiotic in chicken liver

Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii and Bacillus subtilis B10 on intestinal ultrastructure modulation and mucosal immunity development mechanism in broiler chickens

Evaluation of probiotic growth stimulation using prebiotic ingredients to optimize compounds for in ovo delivery

In ovo feeding of probiotic lactobacilli differentially alters expression of genes involved in the development and immunological maturation of bursa of Fabricius in pre-hatched chicks

161 Epigenetic Changes in Poultry Due to Reprogramming of the Gut Microbiota at an Early Stage of Embryonic Development

Microstructure of the small intestine in broiler chickens fed a diet with probiotic or synbiotic supplementation

Effect of different synbiotic administration methods on growth, carcass characteristics, ileum histomorphometry, and blood biochemistry of Cobb-500 broilers