Abstract:Key PointsBiofilm bacteria have been demonstrated to be significant contributors to human disease, yet our understanding of the nature of biofilm infections and their effective treatment remains underdeveloped. Recent research has begun to unlock many of the mysteries associated with biofilm infections; however, substantial research will be necessary before adequate control of biofilm infections will be generally attainable.Biofilms have been shown to be generally more resistant to antimicrobial chemotherapies than free-living bacteria. No current consensus exists regarding the mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents. Numerous competing theories are presently under investigation, yet the phenomenon of biofilm resistance remains a subject generating many questions but few answers.Multiple factors appear to contribute to the overall resistance of biofilm bacteria. These include reduced metabolic and growth rates, protection by extracellular polymeric substances and specific resistance mechanisms conferred by the altered physiology of biofilm bacteria compared with planktonic bacteria.The failure of antibacterial agents to rapidly penetrate into all areas of a biofilm has been considered as a contributing factor to biofilm resistance. Reports indicate that species-composition of biofilms and the choice of antibiotic have a marked impact on antibiotic penetration.Biofilm cells have been shown by a number of investigators to have reduced growth rates, and this is believed to impact the effectiveness of antibiotics that target rapidly multiplying cells. Therefore, antibiotics such as the fluoroquinolones or macrolides may be better therapeutic choices than β-lactams when treating biofilm infections.Altered physiological states of biofilm cells compared with planktonic cells have been demonstrated for a number of bacteria. The activation of specific resistance genes in biofilms has been demonstrated in a few instances. Specific resistance mechanisms should, therefore, be considered when treating biofilm infections.A number of alternative approaches to antibacterial treatment have been proposed for biofilms. Many of these are non-lethal treatments that are expected to enhance the activity of currently used antibiotics. For example, manipulation of electrical fields has shown some promise in enhancing the activity of certain antibiotics against biofilms. The finding that in certain bacteria autoinducers mediate the production of virulence factors, and possibly also biofilm formation, has led to developmental work on autoinducer-blocking agents. These blocking agents are expected, in certain cases, to limit disease progression at the same time as antibiotics are being administered, and, in other cases, to act to enhance the activity of an antibiotic. Biofilm-dispersion agents are currently under development and are anticipated to result in improved access of antibiotics to bacteria, and possibly to alter the physiological status of the bacteria making them more susceptible to antibiotic exposure.The current state of the field indicates that enhanced antimicrobial resistance is a general trait of biofilms and is the result of numerous specific factors which depend on the species involved, the environment of the biofilm and the antimicrobial agent used. It is expected, therefore, that the effective treatment of biofilms in the future will depend on tailoring treatment strategies to specific infection conditions rather than to any general phenomenon common to all biofilms.

Measuring antimicrobial efficacy against biofilms: a meta-analysis

Antimicrobial tolerance in biofilms

Biofilm parameters influencing biocide efficacy

Comparison of the antimicrobial effects of chlorine, silver ion, and tobramycin on biofilm

A microtiter-plate screening method for biofilm disinfection and removal

Comparison of antimicrobial effect on biofilm of chlorine, silver ion and tobramycin

Modeling biofilm antimicrobial resistance

How Do We Determine the Efficacy of an Antibacterial Surface? A Review of Standardised Antibacterial Material Testing Methods

Antimicrobial activity of naturally occurring phenols and derivatives against biofilm and planktonic bacteria

Comparison of the antimicrobial effects of chlorine, silver ion, and tobramycin on biofilm.

Is biofilm removal properly assessed? Comparison of different quantification methods in a 96-well plate system

Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents

How biofilm changes our understanding of cleaning and disinfection

[49] Enhanced bacterial biofilm control using electromagnetic fields in combination with antibiotics

Role of dose concentration in biocide efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms

Strategies for combating bacterial biofilms: A focus on anti-biofilm agents and their mechanisms of action

Different response to amine fluoride by Streptococcus mutans and polymicrobial biofilms in a novel high-throughput active attachment model

Implications of reaction-diffusion theory for the disinfection of microbial biofilms by reactive antimicrobial agents

An Investigation of Cellulase and Epigallocatechin-3-gallate as Enhancers of Antibiotic Efficacy in Polymicrobial Biofilm Treatments

Paired methods to measure biofilm killing and removal: a case study with Penicillin G treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm

Adaptive responses to antimicrobial agents in biofilms