Renoportal Anastomosis During Liver Transplantation in Patients With Portal Vein Thrombosis: First Long-term Results From a Multicenter Study

Daniel Azoulay,Cristiano Quintini,Michel Rayar,Chady Salloum,Laura Llado,Teresa Diago,Giuseppe D'Amico,Emilio Ramos,Joan Fabregat,Rony Eshkenazy,Edouard Bardou-Jacquet,Christophe Camus,Philippe Compagnon,Eric Vibert,Chetana Lim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004797
2022-12-01
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of RPA in a large multicentric series. Summary background: The current knowledge on RPA for portal reconstruction during LT in patients with diffuse PVT and a large splenorenal shunt is poor and limited to case reports and small case series. Methods: All consecutive LTs with RPA performed in 5 centers between 1998 and 2020 were included. RPA was physiological provided it drained the splanchnic venous return through a large splenorenal shunt (≥ 1 cm diameter). Complications of PHT, long-term RPA patency, and patient and graft survival were assessed. RPA success was achieved provided the 3 following criteria were all fulfilled: patients were alive with patent RPA and without clinical PHT. Results: RPA was attempted and feasible in 57 consecutive patients and was physiological in 51 patients (89.5%). Ninety-day mortality occurred in 5 (8.5%) patients, and PHT-related complications occurred in 42.9% of patients. With a median follow-up of 63 months, the 1-, 3- and 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 87%, 83%, and 76% and 82%, 80%, and 73%, respectively. The primary and primary-assisted patency rates at 5 years were 84.5% and 94.3%, respectively. Success was achieved in 90% (27/30) of patients with a follow-up ≥5 years. Conclusions: Despite a high rate of PHT-related complications, excellent long-term patient and graft survival could be achieved. RPA could be considered successful in the vast majority of patients. The expanded use of RPA is warranted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?