Abstract:In the modern information society, the volume of data is constantly growing, and its effective processing is becoming key for enterprises. The transmission and storage of this data also plays a critical role. Big data used in analytics systems is most often transmitted in one of two popular formats: CSV for structured data and JSON for unstructured data. However, existing file formats may not be effective or flexible enough for certain data analysis tasks. For example, they may not support complex data structures or provide sufficient control over metadata. Alternatively, analytical tasks may require additional information about the data, such as metadata, data schema, etc. Based on the above, the subject of this study is a data format based on the combined use of CSV and JSON for processing and analyzing large amounts of information. The option of sharing the designated data types for the implementation of a new data format is proposed. For this purpose, designations have been introduced for the data structure, which includes CSV files, JSON files, metadata and a dependency graph. Various types of functions are described, such as aggregating, transforming, filtering, etc. Examples of the application of these functions to data are given. The proposed approach is a technique that can significantly facilitate the processes of information analysis and processing. It is based on a formalized approach that allows you to establish clear rules and procedures for working with data, which contributes to their more efficient processing. Another aspect of the proposed approach is to determine the criteria for choosing the most appropriate data storage format. This criterion is based on the mathematical principles of information theory and entropy. The introduction of a criterion for choosing a data format based on entropy makes it possible to evaluate the information content and compactness of the data. This approach is based on the calculation of entropy for selected formats and weights reflecting the importance of each data value. By comparing entropies, you can determine the required data transmission format. This approach takes into account not only the compactness of the data, but also the context of their use, as well as the possibility of including additional meta-information in the files themselves and supporting data ready for analysis.

Unravelling Graph-Exchange File Formats

Demystifying Graph Databases: Analysis and Taxonomy of Data Organization, System Designs, and Graph Queries

Graph Databases: Their Power and Limitations

On graph modelling, node ranking and visualisation

Data storage format for analytical systems based on metadata and dependency graphs between CSV and JSON

Towards an Integrated Graph Algebra for Graph Pattern Matching with Gremlin (Extended Version)

Graph versioning for evolving urban data

Expressive Reasoning Graph Store: A Unified Framework for Managing RDF and Property Graph Databases

The Future is Big Graphs! A Community View on Graph Processing Systems

Graphulo: Linear Algebra Graph Kernels for NoSQL Databases

Graph-Based RDF Data Management

The Ubiquity of Large Graphs and Surprising Challenges of Graph Processing: Extended Survey

Revisiting the Expressiveness Landscape of Data Graph Queries

House of Graphs 2.0: a database of interesting graphs and more

(geo)graphs - Complex Networks as a shapefile of nodes and a shapefile of edges for different applications

Graph Database Indexing Using Structured Graph Decomposition.

Graph Visualization for Blockchain Data

Graph Data on the Web: extend the pivot, don't reinvent the wheel

Bridging graph data models: RDF, RDF-star, and property graphs as directed acyclic graphs

A Tutorial of Graph Representation.

Large-scale graph processing systems: a survey