Abstract:Introduction Parkinson’s disease (PD) reduces an individual's capacity for automaticity which limits their ability to perform two tasks simultaneously, negatively impacting daily function. Understanding the neural correlates of dual-tasks (DT) may pave the way for targeted therapies. To better understand automaticity in PD, we aimed to explore whether individuals with differing DT performances possessed differences in brain morphologic characteristics. Methods Data were obtained from 34 individuals with PD and 47 healthy older adults including: 1) demographics (age, sex), 2) disease severity (Movement Disorder Society – Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Hoehn & Yahr, levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD)), 3) cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), 4) Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose, 5) single task- and DT- performance during a DT-Timed-Up-and-Go test utilizing a serial-subtraction task, and 6) Cortical thicknesses and subcortical volumes obtained from volumetric MRI. Participants were categorized as low or high DT performers if their combined DT-effect was greater than the previously determined mean value for healthy older adults (μ=74.2). Nonparametric testing using Quade’s ANCOVA was conducted to compare cortical thicknesses and brain volumes between the highDT and lowDT groups while controlling for covariates: age, sex, MDS-UPDRS part III, LEDD, and intracranial volume. Secondarily, similar comparisons were made between the healthy older adult group the highDT and lowDT groups. Lastly, a hierarchical linear regression model was conducted regressing combined DT-effect on covariates (block one) and cortical thicknesses (block 2) in stepwise fashion. Results The highDT group had thicker cortices than the lowDT group in the right primary somatosensory (p=0.001), bilateral primary motor (p=<0.001, left; p=0.002, right), bilateral supplementary motor area (p=0.001, left; p<0.001, right), and mean of the bilateral hemispheres (p=0.001, left; p<0.001, right). Of note, left primary cortex thickness (p=0.002), left prefrontal cortex thickness (p<0.001), and right supplementary motor area thickness (p=0.003) differed when adding a healthy comparison group. Additionally, the regression analysis found that the left paracentral lobule thickness explained 20.8% of the variability in combined DT-effect (p=0.011) beyond the influence of covariates. Conclusions These results suggest regions underlying dual-task performance; specifically, a convergence of neural control relying sensorimotor integration, motor planning, and motor activation to achieve higher levels of DT performance for individuals with PD.

On the localization of reward effects in overlapping dual tasks

Reward Enhances Backward Inhibition in Task Switching

Dual-task Costs in Memory Recall Precision Reflect Shared Representational Space

Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach

Practice effects on dual-task order coordination and its sequential adjustment

The Temporal Profile of Dual-task Interference in the Human Brain

Can frequent long stimulus onset ansynchronies (SOAs) foster the representation of two separated task-sets in dual-tasking?

Divided Attention and Dual Task

The dual-task practice advantage: Empirical evidence and cognitive mechanisms

Impact of process interference on memory encoding and retrieval processes in dual-task situations

The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks

The effect of performance contingent reward prospects flexibly adapts to more versus less specific task goals

Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory.

The electrophysiology of sequential adjustments of dual‐task order coordination

Is there a bilingual advantage on interference-control tasks? A multiverse meta-analysis of global reaction time and interference cost

Dual-task interference: Bottleneck constraint or capacity sharing? Evidence from automatic and controlled processes

Developmental Changes in Executive Control: Investigating Dual-Task Interference During Motor and Central Cognitive Processing with the Overlapping Task Paradigm

Why Does Dual-Tasking Hamper Implicit Sequence Learning?

Reward-based modulation of task-switching performance: a diffusion model analysis

A mechanism underlying improved dual-task performance after practice: Reviewing evidence for the memory hypothesis

Dual-task performance and brain morphologic characteristics in Parkinson’s disease.