Differentiating Left Ventricular Remodeling in Aortic Stenosis From Systemic Hypertension
Masliza MahmodKenneth ChanJoao F. FernandesRina ArigaBetty RamanErnesto ZacurHo-fon Royce LawMarzia RigolliJane M. FrancisSairia DassKevin O'GallagherSaul G. MyersonTheodoros D. KaramitsosStefan NeubauerPablo LamataUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research,Division of Cardiovascular Medicine,Radcliffe Department of Medicine (M.M.,K.C.,R.A.,B.R.,M.R.,J.M.F.,S.D.,S.G.M.,S.N.),University of Oxford,United Kingdom.Department of Biomedical Engineering (E.Z.),University of Oxford,United Kingdom.Department of Biomedical Engineering (J.F.F.,H.-F.R.L.,P.L.),King's College of London,United Kingdom.Department Cardiovascular Medicine (K.O.G.),King's College of London,United Kingdom.1st Department of Cardiology,Aristotle University,Thessaloniki,Greece (T.D.K.).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.123.016489
2024-08-22
Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
Abstract:Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, Volume 17, Issue 8, Page e016489, August 1, 2024. BACKGROUND:Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy occurs in both aortic stenosis (AS) and systemic hypertension (HTN) in response to wall stress. However, differentiation of hypertrophy due to these 2 etiologies is lacking. The aim was to study the 3-dimensional geometric remodeling pattern in severe AS pre- and postsurgical aortic valve replacement and to compare with HTN and healthy controls.METHODS:Ninety-one subjects (36 severe AS, 19 HTN, and 36 healthy controls) underwent cine cardiac magnetic resonance. Cardiac magnetic resonance was repeated 8 months post-aortic valve replacement (n=18). Principal component analysis was performed on the 3-dimensional meshes reconstructed from 109 cardiac magnetic resonance scans of 91 subjects at end-diastole. Principal component analysis modes were compared across experimental groups together with conventional metrics of shape, strain, and scar.RESULTS:A unique AS signature was identified by wall thickness linked to a LV left-right axis shift and a decrease in short-axis eccentricity. HTN was uniquely linked to increased septal thickness. Combining these 3 features had good discriminative ability between AS and HTN (area under the curve, 0.792). The LV left-right axis shift was not reversible post-aortic valve replacement, did not associate with strain, age, or sex, and was predictive of postoperative LV mass regression (R2=0.339,P=0.014).CONCLUSIONS:Unique remodeling signatures might differentiate the etiology of LV hypertrophy. Preliminary findings suggest that LV axis shift is characteristic in AS, is not reversible post-aortic valve replacement, predicts mass regression, and may be interpreted to be an adaptive mechanism.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,cardiac & cardiovascular systems