Abstract:Introduction Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to a bias against returning attention to a location that has been recently attended. Previous study has demonstrated that spatial working memory (WM) play a key role in determining and maintaining inhibition at cued locations. However, Tipper et al (1991) found that IOR not only existed in static but also in dynamic displays. It thus remains unclear which type of WM underlies the maintenance and updating of IOR in dynamic displays. Moreover, Despite IOR in dynamic displays has received a great deal of research, no consensus has yet been reached regarding the nature of the IOR in dynamic displays: Tipper et al (1991) suggested that IOR in dynamic displays was inhibited from return to recently attended objects. Robertson et al (2001, 2004), however, suggested that this effect could be reinterpreted as spatial reorienting processes. The present study aimed to examine 1) which type of WM underlies the maintenance and updating of inhibition in dynamic displays and 2) whether object-based IOR in dynamic displays was resulted from the updating of the spatial inhibition or the inhibition of object representation. Method The study employed Three 2 2 factorial within subjects design. The two factors are cuing (the target presented on the cued object, the target presented on the un-cued object) and have WM load or not (have WM load, have no WM load), with voice WM, spatial WM and visual WM load in three experiment respectively. 60 undergraduate students form northeast normal university volunteered to participate for paid. They ranged in ages from19 to 23 years old. All participants were naive to the purpose of the experiment and had normal or corrected-to-normal vision. Stimulus presentation and data collection were controlled by a LENOVO microcomputer running E-prime software. By using the dual-task paradigm, three experiments investigated the role of the voice, spatial and visual working memory in IOR, respectively. Results The results of present study showed that when the working memory task was non-spatial in nature (voice or visual), IOR was present, although overall reaction times were greater in the presence of the WM task. When the task involved a spatial WM load, IOR was eliminated. Conclusions Overall, the results suggested that spatial working memory system plays a key role in the maintenance and updating of the IOR in dynamic displays and provided new evidence for the idea that the so-called object-based IOR in the dynamic displays was the result of update of the spatial inhibition rather than the object inhibition.

Oculomotor inhibition markers of working memory load

Ocular working memory signals are flexible to behavioral priority and subjective imagery strength

Fixation duration surpasses pupil size as a measure of memory load in free viewing

Eye Movements During Working Memory Retention Period Influence Performance

Does High Memory Load Kick Task-Irrelevant Information out of Visual Working Memory?

Oculomotor rehearsal in visuospatial working memory

The Influence of The Working Memory on Object-based Inhibition of Return in Dynamic Displays

Memory load influences our preparedness to act on visual representations in working memory without affecting their accessibility

Saccades Elicit Obligatory Allocation of Visual Working Memory

The Influence of Working Memory Load of Binding on Selective Attention

The Linear Impact of Visual Working Memory Load on Visual Awareness: Evidence from Motion-Induced Blindness.

[Study on Sensitivity of Event-Related EEG Sychronization and Desychronization Visual Memory Load].

Neural Activity is Dynamically Modulated by Memory Load During the Maintenance of Spatial Objects

Visual Working-Memory Capacity Load Does Not Modulate Distractor Processing

Visual Working Memory Impairs Visual Detection: A Function of Working Memory Load or Sensory Load?

Eye Activity Correlates of Workload during a Visuospatial Memory Task.

Spatial Working Memory Load Impairs Manual but Not Saccadic Inhibition of Return.

Do we actively inhibit recently attended but no longer relevant information

Cortical and white matter substrates supporting visuospatial working memory

Adverse Orienting Effects on Visual Working Memory Encoding and Maintenance

Verbal working memory modulates afferent circuits in motor cortex