Relations of body dissatisfaction with self-injurious thoughts and behaviours in clinical and non-clinical samples: a meta-analysis of studies published between 1995 and 2022

Yaoxiang Ren,Shuqi Cui,Tianxiang Cui,Chanyuan Tang,Jianwen Song,Todd Jackson,Jinbo He,Yaoxiang RenShuqi CuiTianxiang CuiChanyuan TangJianwen SongTodd JacksonJinbo Hea School of Humanities and Social Science,The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Shenzhen,Shenzhen,People's Republic of Chinab Department of Psychology,University of Macau,Macau,Taipa S.A.R.,People's Republic of China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2310140
2024-01-31
Health Psychology Review
Abstract:Body dissatisfaction is a global public health concern. Self-injurious thoughts and behaviours (SITB), including suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), have been documented as potentially significant correlates of body dissatisfaction. However, prior findings regarding associations between body dissatisfaction and SITB have been somewhat inconsistent. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to determine the nature and strength of such associations in both clinical and non-clinical samples. A literature search identified 83 relevant articles and extracted 234 effect sizes. Using a three-level random-effects model, mean effect sizes ( r values) for relationships between body dissatisfaction and suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and NSSI in clinical samples were 0.29 (95% CI, 0.22–0.37), 0.16 (95% CI, 0.13–0.20) and 0.26 (95% CI, 0.19–0.34), respectively. In non-clinical samples, these values were 0.22 (95% CI, 0.16–0.28), 0.24 (95% CI, 0.17–0.30) and 0.22 (95% CI, 0.15–0.29), respectively. Several study features (e.g., participant age, geographic region and instrument validity) emerged as significant moderators. This meta-analysis provides robust support for body dissatisfaction as a significant correlate of SITB across clinical and non-clinical samples in addition to identifying study characteristics that contribute to effect size variability. Implications are discussed for SITB research, prevention and intervention.
psychology, clinical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?