Computing Terrain Multi-visibility Maps for a Set of View Segments Using Graphics Hardware

N. Coll,Marta Fort,Narcis Madern,J. Sellarès

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11751540_10

2006-05-08

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Moral Machines?

M. Pritchard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9363-x

IF: 3.777

2012-04-07

Science and Engineering Ethics

Abstract:
‘Healthcare Heroes’: problems with media focus on heroism from healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Caitríona L Cox

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106398

2020-06-16

Journal of Medical Ethics

Abstract:During the COVID-19 pandemic, the media have repeatedly praised healthcare workers for their ‘heroic’ work. Although this gratitude is undoubtedly appreciated by many, we must be cautious about overuse of the term ‘hero’ in such discussions. The challenges currently faced by healthcare workers are substantially greater than those encountered in their normal work, and it is understandable that the language of heroism has been evoked to praise them for their actions. Yet such language can have potentially negative consequences. Here, I examine what heroism is and why it is being applied to the healthcare workers currently, before outlining some of the problems associated with the heroism narrative currently being employed by the media. Healthcare workers have a clear and limited duty to treat during the COVID-19 pandemic, which can be grounded in a broad social contract and is strongly associated with certain reciprocal duties that society has towards healthcare workers. I argue that the heroism narrative can be damaging, as it stifles meaningful discussion about what the limits of this duty to treat are. It fails to acknowledge the importance of reciprocity, and through its implication that all healthcare workers have to be heroic, it can have negative psychological effects on workers themselves. I conclude that rather than invoking the language of heroism to praise healthcare workers, we should examine, as a society, what duties healthcare workers have to work in this pandemic, and how we can support them in fulfilling these.

ethics,medical ethics,social issues,social sciences, biomedical
Viral Heroism: What the Rhetoric of Heroes in the COVID-19 Pandemic Tells Us About Medicine and Professional Identity

Patrick D. Hopkins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09434-4

2021-02-07

HEC Forum

Abstract:Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic the use of the term "hero" has been widespread. This is especially common in the context of healthcare workers and it is now unremarkable to see large banners on hospital exteriors that say "heroes work here". There is more to be gleaned from the rhetoric of heroism than just awareness of public appreciation, however. Calling physicians and nurses heroes for treating sick people indicates something about the concept of medicine and medical professionals. In this essay, I will examine three aspects of the social role of medicine exposed by the language of heroism. One, if a hero is someone who goes above and the call of duty, then does that mean exposing oneself to risk of infection is no longer a duty of physicians (as it used to be)? If so, does that mean the "profession" of medicine is much like any other business? Two, physicians and nurses are not the only "heroes" this go-around. Anyone deemed essential to the US "infrastructure" is designated by the US government as having "special responsibilities" to remain at their posts for the public good, which explicitly puts physicians in the same category as sewage workers and grocery store cashiers. Three, what does it mean to belong to a profession that does (or does not) have self-sacrifice and risk-taking as part of its mission—especially a profession that rarely gets called upon to practice these obligations?

ethics
[Oligomerization of human and viral 7TM proteins: a new viral strategy to manipulate host cells].

R. Jockers,F. Gbahou,K. Tadagaki,M. Kamal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20122810015

Abstract:G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), also called seven transmembrane domain (7TM) proteins, represent the largest family of membrane receptors with approximately 900 members in humans. Although a substantial number of 7TM proteins have been matched with endogenous ligands, for many of them no ligand has been identified raising questions about their function. Ligand-independent functions have been proposed for several of these so-called orphan 7TM proteins such as the modulation of the function of 7TM proteins with identified ligand through the formation of heteromeric complexes. Interestingly, viruses are using a similar strategy to hijack the host cell signaling machinery and to promote virus replication and dissemination. Indeed, to affect host cell function, several viruses encode orphan 7TM proteins that heteromerize either with other virally-encoded or with host-encoded 7TM proteins with identified ligands. This highlights the strategic importance of 7TM protein signaling and heteromerization for the regulation of cellular homeostasis.
"I Don't Feel Like a Hero": Frontline Healthcare Providers' Social Media Storytelling during COVID-19

Stephanie M Pangborn,Brandon C Boatwright,Caleigh L Miller,Madelyn N Velting

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.2017108

Abstract:While much of the world watched rising numbers of COVID-19 infections and deaths from the safety of their homes, frontline healthcare providers (FHPs) were face-to-face with a virus that threatened the globe. While our social, political, and economic structures were ill-equipped to handle a global health crisis and our politicization of the disease nurtured divisive dialogues, FHPs pushed their own bodies and minds to unimaginable limits as they witnessed and fought the realities of COVID-19 to care for patients. During and between their extended shifts, FHPs shared their stories on social media platforms, bringing an otherwise hidden perspective of the pandemic to accessible online spaces. In this qualitative study, we analyzed 1 year of FHPs' Twitter posts (March 13, 2020 through March 12, 2021) to engage with the narratives embedded within their tweets. We also interviewed FHPs to learn about their experiences using social media during the pandemic. Findings suggest that FHPs' social media engagement was a communicative effort to cultivate resilience within a context beyond their immediate control while shaping our collective COVID-19 narrative. Twitter served as a permissible public space in which they could manage the tension of being both person and professional, sharing stories of testimony and witness to reveal, manage, and respond to the traumas, vulnerabilities, and injustices they experienced: sacrificing self, caring while pawns to power, and fulfilling responsibility to educate amid contentious spaces.
War, Heroes and Sacrifice: Masking Neoliberal Violence During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Ben A Lohmeyer,Nik Taylor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520975824

2020-11-29

Critical Sociology

Abstract:The precarity and violation that has resulted from decades of neoliberal reforms have been made clear in the global COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in terms of access to healthcare and financial inequality. However, ideological discourses of individual heroics have been rapidly deployed, to patch up the damage done to neoliberal rhetoric. In this paper, we argue a critical sociological lens reveals something important about this violence of neoliberalism at this moment during the crisis. Analysing media articles that have considerable reach, availability and shareability, we interrogate the rhetorical framing of frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and uncover three significant themes: ‘celebrating “our” heroes’, ‘personal sacrifice’ and ‘the heroes of war’. We argue that the emerging field of the sociology of violence provides the means to expose the violence of neoliberalism in the current COVID-19 pandemic as well as identify the discursive apparatus that obscure the violation of neoliberalism more generally.

sociology
Heroism and/as injurious speech: Recognition, precarity, and inequality in health and social care work

Sophie Hales,Melissa Tyler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12832

2022-03-31

Abstract:This paper draws on Judith Butler's (2009, 1997) writing on precarity and the interpellatory power of naming, read through her recent writing on the dynamics of recognition, vulnerability, and resistance, to develop a critique of the discourse of heroism used to position health and social care professionals, and other key workers, during the COVID pandemic. It does so in order to reflect on the insights into workplace inequalities that this example provides, in particular into what, to borrow from Butler, we might think of as the conditions necessary for a "workable life". It argues that, although it might seem paradoxical, the heroic discourses and symbolism used to recognize health and social care workers throughout the pandemic can be understood as a form of "injurious speech" in Butler's terms, one that served to other key workers by subjecting them to a reified, rhetorical form of recognition. The analysis argues that this had the effect of accentuating health and care workers' precarity and of undermining their capacity to challenge and resist this positioning.

womens studies,management
Nursing appeals on social media in times of coronavirus

Elaine Cristina Novatzki Forte,Denise Elvira Pires de Pires

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0225

Abstract:Objective: to know and analyze the nursing appeals on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: it is a documentary, qualitative, descriptive, and exploratory research with data collected in publications in two social media. Two hundred ninety-five publications of nursing professionals published on Twitter and Instagram between March 11 and 20, 2020 were submitted to content analysis using ATLAS.ti resources. Results: four thematic categories emerged: #stayathome, #whereismyPPE, #nowweareheroes, #nothingnewinthefrontline, according to frequency of communications. The appeals show a relationship with the social relevance of nursing professional work and with the conditions required for its exercise. Final considerations: old and new challenges of the profession were placed on the agenda in social media, especially related to the workforce and instruments of labor. These speeches can serve as a foundation for policies to improve working conditions and promote appreciation of the profession.
Hero-Making in Chinese and U.S. News During COVID-19: The Warrior and Leader Images of Zhong Nanshan and Anthony Fauci

Jing Jiang Zhuo Ban Weiwei Jiang a School of Journalism and Communication,Hunan Universityb School of Communication,Film,& Media Studies,University of Cincinnatic Independent Researcher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2419703

IF: 3.501

2024-11-09

Health Communication

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic posed significant challenges to global health and raised important questions about social coordination. Amidst the crisis, discursive constructions of national heroes proliferated in Chinese and U.S. mainstream news media and played a crucial role in exercising social control and influence. From a comparative perspective, this article examines the structure and functions of heroic discourses and explores the similarities and differences of heroism across national borders. Specifically, we interrogate news reports on Zhong Nanshan and Anthony Fauci, two medical experts who emerged as prominent heroes in China and the U.S. respectively. Adopting a qualitative approach, we identify two central images in the construction of Zhong and Fauci as national heroes. One is "the warrior," which illuminates the heroic qualities of determination, bravery, altruism, and perseverance. The other is "the leader," which shows Zhong and Fauci's pioneering roles and abilities in attracting followers. Intermingled with these two images are themes of moral excellence and exceptionalism. The most salient difference in the hero-making is that Zhong assumes a "supported hero" while Fauci assumes a "contested hero." Overall, despite nuances shaped by socio-political contexts, Chinese and U.S. media share quite similar narrative structures in making national heroes during the pandemic.

health policy & services,communication
Development of the conducting system in the human heart [proceedings].

A. Wenink

Abstract:
Fetal and Neonatal Cortical Adrenal Function in Birth Asphyxia

R. Procianoy,C. Giacomini,MARIA LIÉGE B. Oliveira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1988.tb10728.x

1988-09-01

Abstract:ABSTRACT. Eighteen newborn infants, gestational age between 36 and 42 weeks with birth asphyxia were compared with 23 normal newborn infants to determine serum cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels in cord blood and in venous blood samples collected 12–18 hours after birth. Both groups were similar in gestational age, birthweight, proportion of small for gestational age and large for gestational age infants, proportion of infants delivered by cesarean section with and without labor, and proportion of mothers with pre‐eclampsia. There was no antenatal exposure to corticosteroid. The asphyxiated newborn infants had a significantly higher mean cord serum level of cortisol, and a significantly lower mean cord serum level of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate than the control group. Mean serum cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels collected 12–18 hours after birth were similar between both groups. It is suggested that elevated cord serum level of cortisol is related to birth asphyxia stress stimulating the adrenal definitive zone, and the low cord serum level of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate is secondary to a transient hypoxemic‐ischemic insult to the adrenal fetal zone.
Experiences of critical care nurses during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic

Dorothy James Moore,Denise Dawkins,Michelle DeCoux Hampton,Susan McNiesh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330211043273

IF: 3.344

2022-02-09

Nursing Ethics

Abstract:Background: Critical care nurses have risked their lives and in some cases their families through hazardous duty during the COVID-19 pandemic and have faced multiple ethical challenges. Research/aim: The purpose of our study was to examine how critical care nurses coped with the sustained multi-faceted pressures of the critical care environment during the unchartered waters of the COVID-19 pandemic. It was anticipated that our study might reveal numerous ethical challenges and decision points. Research design: A qualitative descriptive study, utilizing an interpretivist paradigm. Participants and research setting: Critical care nurses, working in either intensive care units or emergency departments (N = 11) who were primarily from Northern California hospitals. Individual in-depth ZOOM® session interviews, guided by semi-structured questions, were used to collect data. Interviews lasted between 18 and 59 min, with an average length of 33 min. Session interviews were transcribed and analyzed. Ethical considerations: This study was approved by the researchers’ university Institutional Review Board. Findings: Five main themes emerged: Fear of the Unknown, Adapting to Practice Changes and Challenges, Patient Advocacy and Moral Distress, Isolation and the Depersonalization of Care, and Professionalism and a Call to Duty. Discussion and conclusion: Fear of becoming ill or bringing COVID-19 home to their families was a constant source of anxiety for nurses. There were numerous changes in policy and challenges to standard practice protocols, including most notably shortages in personal protective equipment, which nurses navigated resourcefully. Most nurses interviewed were motivated by a sense of professional duty. The nurses experienced some moral distress in their inability to advocate as they might like for their patients, especially at end of life. Infection control requirements for isolation.

nursing,ethics
From protection of sacrificial self to critical turning points and growth: Nurses’ experiences on the frontline during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sinéad Creedon,Anna Trace

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.19.24317599

2024-11-20

Abstract:The mental health and wellbeing of nurses has been a concern, long before the arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic. Working on the frontline under such challenging circumstances, for extended periods of time, has resulted in negative psychological responses. The current study aims to examine nurses' resilience in acute hospitals in Ireland, during a period of adversity (pandemic), to explore it’s impact on their personal and professional identity, and their perception of meaningful supports and coping. An interpretative phenomenological analysis was carried out to gain insight into how nurses adapted to the changing work environment during the pandemic. Online semi-structured interviews were carried out with six experienced female nurses, who were redeployed to the frontline from their own roles. Three experiential themes representing the nurses’ journey were generated: Protection of Sacrificial Self; The Fortifying Effect of Us, and Critical Turning Points & Growth. Nurses made significant sacrifices and had to find ways to detach to cope. They revitalized themselves by creating a sense of ‘us’ to help them face a harsh climate against others, which enabled critical turning points and growth. This study has strongly highlighted the emotional effects on nurses due to feeling isolated, undervalued, and excluded during redeployment to the frontline. It has also featured how well nurses coped while faced with an existential crisis and has given voice to all nurses who faced this pandemic despite exposure to risk of burnout and threats to their mental health and wellbeing. This study has further enriched our understanding of personal growth and trauma in adverse work conditions by including an exploration of what sacrificial commitment adds to our understanding of physical and moral courage. Future provision of supports for nurses must be ongoing both during and after crisis events.
Challenging times: ethics, nursing and the COVID‐19 pandemic

Sue Turale,Chutima Meechamnan,Wipada Kunaviktikul

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12598

IF: 3.384

2020-06-01

International Nursing Review

Abstract:Globally nurses and midwives are working hard to detect cases of COVID‐19, to save lives or give comfort in the face of death, to educate themselves and the public about protective measures to stop the viral spread, while still caring for those not infected with the virus. In many countries nurses are working under virtual siege from this pandemic, with not enough resources or personal protective equipment, overwhelming numbers of patients, staff shortages, underprepared health systems and supply chain failures. Nurses and other health and emergency workers are suffering physical and emotional stress, and moral distress from conflicting professional values. They are faced with unpalatable and complex ethical issues in practice, with moral conflicts, high levels of acuity and patient deaths, and long working hours. A rising number of nurses are infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 or dying in the line of duty. Nurses need strong moral courage, stamina and resilience to work on the front lines of the pandemic, often while separated from their loved ones.
Therapeutic implications from clinical trials for the treatment of hypertension.

N. Kaplan

1986-09-01

Abstract:
Nurses on the Front Lines Confronting COVID-19 Pandemic

Ahmed Lateef Alkhaqani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v2i.60

2022-03-01

Abstract:Nurses worldwide face major health care problems, such as high patient mortality, high health care demands, a reduction in health care supplies, and extraordinary physical and emotional stress. First-line health and nurses working in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) played a significant role in responding to patients with COVID-19 globally. The COVID-19 epidemic marks a world public health crisis that has not been seen in the past century and has spread rapidly worldwide and the associated mortality burden. Health workers worldwide are responding to the demand for treatment of patients with COVID-19, which may result in high costs to their health and well-being. It is increasingly recognized that COVID-19 may affect the mental health of front-line workers, and it calls for psychological and social support. However, little attention has been paid to understanding the impact of working on a pandemic from healthcare workers’ perspectives or their views about support.
Frontline Nurses' Experiences of Patient Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Phenomenological Study

Zahra Khademi,Elham Imani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2023.30327

2022-11-07

Abstract:Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic is now a major public health crisis in the world. Nurses as key members of professional are exposed the most challenges caused by COVID19. Knowledgeable nurses' experiences can provide appropriate solutions to increase the quality of care and improve the health of the society. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of nurses' caring for patients with COVID-19. Methods: 12 nurses participated in this phenomenological study. We performed purposeful sampling and in-depth face-to-face and semi-structured individual interviews for collecting data. Qualitative data, was analyzed by the 6-step Van Manen hermeneutic phenomenology. Results: After data analysis, the mean (SD) age of study participants was 32.25 (5.62) years and their mean work experience was 9.75 (5.39) years. From the analysis of data obtained from interviews with nurses working in COVID-19 wards, 1050 primary codes, 17 subthemes and 5 themes were extracted. Main themes include: sincere service, patient oppression, emotional instability, suspension and relaxation. Conclusion: Analysis of data in this study suggested that the nurses who care patients in COVID-19 pandemic, faced many professional and psychological challenges. Healthcare managers should plan for psychological support services for the nurses.
Heroism and paramedic practice: A constructivist metasynthesis of qualitative research

Nigel Rees,Julia Williams,Chloe Hogan,Lauren Smyth,Thomas Archer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016841

IF: 3.8

2022-11-07

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Objectives We aimed to identify, appraise, and synthesise the qualitative literature to develop theory on heroism and paramedic practice. Hypothesis/research question What does published literature tell us about heroism and paramedic practice? Setting Paramedics and other healthcare workers (HCWs) faced an outpouring of public support for them early in the COVID-19 pandemic which brought into focus the relationship between them and society, where they are portrayed as heroes. Participants We conducted a metasynthesis using Evolved Grounded Theory and procedural guidelines of Noblit and Hare to guide analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines were also applied. Results 151 papers were retrieved and eleven included in the final sample. Studies were moderate to very low quality, involving a wide range of methodologies and settings; none specifically explored heroism and paramedic practice. The following interrelated themes were constructed on heroism and paramedic practice: (a) Myth, Folk law, and storytelling in heroism and paramedic practice (b) The epic journey of heroism and paramedic practice (c) Heroes and Zeroes: The fluctuating Societal Value in heroism and paramedic practice (d) Politicisation, and objectification in Heroism and Paramedic practice. Conclusion Paramedics have long been characterised as heroes, but this may not reflect their everyday experiences. Heroism in paramedic practice can provide scripts for prosocial action, inspiring others, and leading to more social heroic actions. Paramedics may however be ambivalent to such heroism narratives, due to politicisation, and objectification in the media and society. This metasynthesis is only one of many possible constructions of heroism and paramedic practice and is the first point in making sense of and developing theory on heroism and paramedic practice. Study registration PROSPERO: CRD42021234851.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Identity work of public hospital nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa

Nosipho M Maseko,Roslyn T De Braine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v47i1.2506

2024-08-08

Curationis

Abstract:Background: Nurses play a remarkable role in our healthcare system and contribute to the wellbeing of communities at large. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, nurses faced various challenges to provide adequate patient healthcare. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the identity work of public hospital nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: The study followed a phenomenological qualitative approach with an interpretive view, employing two sampling methods: purposive and snowball sampling. The sample comprised 11 nurses from a public hospital in the Gauteng province. The data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: The findings revealed that the nurses faced identity demands, which resulted in them experiencing identity tensions. There was also a need for recognition and support; their work served a greater purpose and was meaningful to them. The nurses used different identity work strategies, such as family support, spiritual upliftment and meaningful work to deal with the identity tensions and demands they experienced. Conclusion: Strategies such as counselling and wellbeing programmes should be implemented to assist nurses in dealing with the physical and psychological effects of working in the health sector during pandemics and epidemics. Hospitals and governments should create healthier working environments by conducting workshops, training and upskilling initiatives, encouraging nurses' inclusion in policymaking and implementation.Contribution: The study provided insight into the challenges nurses encountered during the COVID-19 pandemic, how these challenges affected their nursing identity and roles, and the strategies they used to maintain their sense of self in their work.
"I Don't Want to Go to Work": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Healthcare Worker Experiences from the Front- and Side-Lines of COVID-19

Smith F Heavner,Mackenzie Stuenkel,Rebecca Russ Sellers,Rhiannon McCallus,Kendall D Dean,Chloe Wilson,Marissa Shuffler,Thomas W Britt,Shannon Stark Taylor,Molly Benedum,Niki Munk,Rachel Mayo,Kathleen Buford Cartmell,Sarah Griffin,Ann Blair Kennedy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20115953

2023-05-25

Abstract:During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCW) were categorized as "essential" and "non-essential", creating a division where some were "locked-in" a system with little ability to prepare for or control the oncoming crisis. Others were "locked-out" regardless of whether their skills might be useful. The purpose of this study was to systematically gather data over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic from HCW through an interprofessional lens to examine experiences of locked-out HCW. This convergent parallel mixed-methods study captured perspectives representing nearly two dozen professions through a survey, administered via social media, and video blogs. Analysis included logistic regression models of differences in outcome measures by professional category and Rapid Identification of Themes from Audio recordings (RITA) of video blogs. We collected 1299 baseline responses from 15 April 2020 to 16 March 2021. Of those responses, 12.1% reported no signs of burnout, while 21.9% reported four or more signs. Qualitative analysis identified four themes: (1) professional identity, (2) intrinsic stressors, (3) extrinsic factors, and (4) coping strategies. There are some differences in the experiences of locked-in and locked-out HCW. This did not always lead to differing reports of moral distress and burnout, and both groups struggled to cope with the realities of the pandemic.

Computing Terrain Multi-visibility Maps for a Set of View Segments Using Graphics Hardware

Moral Machines?

‘Healthcare Heroes’: problems with media focus on heroism from healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Viral Heroism: What the Rhetoric of Heroes in the COVID-19 Pandemic Tells Us About Medicine and Professional Identity

[Oligomerization of human and viral 7TM proteins: a new viral strategy to manipulate host cells].

"I Don't Feel Like a Hero": Frontline Healthcare Providers' Social Media Storytelling during COVID-19

War, Heroes and Sacrifice: Masking Neoliberal Violence During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Heroism and/as injurious speech: Recognition, precarity, and inequality in health and social care work

Nursing appeals on social media in times of coronavirus

Hero-Making in Chinese and U.S. News During COVID-19: The Warrior and Leader Images of Zhong Nanshan and Anthony Fauci

Development of the conducting system in the human heart [proceedings].

Fetal and Neonatal Cortical Adrenal Function in Birth Asphyxia

Experiences of critical care nurses during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic

From protection of sacrificial self to critical turning points and growth: Nurses’ experiences on the frontline during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Challenging times: ethics, nursing and the COVID‐19 pandemic

Therapeutic implications from clinical trials for the treatment of hypertension.

Nurses on the Front Lines Confronting COVID-19 Pandemic

Frontline Nurses' Experiences of Patient Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Phenomenological Study

Heroism and paramedic practice: A constructivist metasynthesis of qualitative research

Identity work of public hospital nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa

"I Don't Want to Go to Work": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Healthcare Worker Experiences from the Front- and Side-Lines of COVID-19