Coronary computed tomography angiography before on-pump cardiac surgery does not reduce the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury compared to coronary angiography

Yang Yan,Yongxin Li,Wenyan Liu,Jing Li,Yongjian Zhang,Fengfeng Liu,Xinglong Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-021-01602-8
Abstract:Objectives: Cardiac surgery and contrast media are both related to acute kidney injury. We investigated whether undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography, which uses less contrast medium, before on-pump cardiac surgery could reduce the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury compared to coronary angiography. Methods: In this retrospective study, 745 and 171 patients underwent coronary angiography and coronary computed tomography angiography, respectively, within 30 days before on-pump cardiac surgery. Postoperative acute kidney injury was defined according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Definition and Staging criteria. Results: Age, hypertension, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and performing cardiac surgery within 24 h of preoperative angiography (odds ratio: 1.507, 95% confidence interval: 1.111‒2.045, P = 0.008) independently predicted postoperative acute kidney injury on multivariable analysis. After propensity score matching, the acute kidney injury incidence in coronary angiography and computed tomography angiography groups was 43% and 46%, respectively (P = 0.65), and the groups had similar intensive care unit stay (2 days vs. 2 days, P = 0.209), postoperative hospital stay (11 days vs. 12 days, P = 0.084), postoperative continuous renal replacement therapy use (0.6% vs 1.9%, P = 0.314), and in-hospital mortality (0 vs. 1.3%, P = 0.156). In-hospital outcomes were similar among patients who underwent preoperative coronary angiography or computed tomography angiography within 24 h before cardiac surgery. Conclusion: Although coronary computed tomography angiography uses less contrast medium, it does not reduce the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury or improve in-hospital outcomes compared to coronary angiography.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?