Abstract:Research on the association between rural households’ livelihood capitals and livelihood strategies has long been of interest in geography, management, economics, ecology and other disciplines. However, the existing micro-empirical studies are mostly small-scale surveys of rural households; there are much fewer large-scale investigations at the national level. Meanwhile, few empirical studies have analyzed the sensitivity of rural households’ livelihood strategies to various types of livelihood capitals in different types of villages, from the perspective of village type. This study uses survey data from 8031 rural households in 226 villages from 27 provinces (cities) of China; the villages were divided into three types: plain villages, hilly villages and mountainous villages. The livelihood capitals and livelihood strategies of rural households in different types of villages were examined, and ordinal logistic regression models were construed to explore the sensitivity of rural households’ livelihood strategies to various types of livelihood capitals in different types of villages. The results revealed that: (1) the sample of rural households had similar livelihood asset structures and livelihood strategy selections across the different types of villages. Among them, human capital was the most important livelihood asset for rural households, while rural households had the lowest dependence on natural capital; off-farm work was the main livelihood strategy for rural households, followed by on-farm work, while the proportion of households engaged in part-time work was the smallest. (2) Rural households’ livelihood strategies had different sensitivities to various types of livelihood capitals, and there were also differences in the sensitivities among different types of villages. For the total sample, as well as the hill and mountain village sub-samples, human and financial capitals had significant positive impacts on livelihood strategy, while nature and social capitals had significant negative impacts on livelihood strategy; physical capital had no significant impact on livelihood strategy. For the plain village sub-sample, human and physical capitals had significant positive impacts on livelihood strategy, while nature capital had a significant negative impact on livelihood strategy; financial and social capitals had no significant impacts on livelihood strategy. This study enhances our understanding of the characteristics of rural households’ livelihood capital structures and livelihood strategy selections as well as the sensitivity of rural households’ livelihood strategies to various types of livelihood capitals among different types of villages in China. These findings provide reference for the formulation of policies related to the improvement of rural households’ livelihoods in different types of villages.

Accessibility of Rural Life Space on the Jianghan Plain, China: The Role of Livelihood

Changes in Everyday Life of Rural China: a Perspective of Mobilities

Understanding the spatiality of the rural poor's livelihoods in Northeast China: Geographical context, location and urban hierarchy

Sensitivity of Livelihood Strategy to Livelihood Capital: an Empirical Investigation Using Nationally Representative Survey Data from Rural China

Investigating Access to Periodic Markets in Rural China

Sensitivity of Rural Households’ Livelihood Strategies to Livelihood Capital in Poor Mountainous Areas: an Empirical Analysis in the Upper Reaches of the Min River, China

The Impact of Rural Location on Farmers' Livelihood in the Loess Plateau: Local, Urban-Rural, and Interconnected Multi-Spatial Perspective Research

Characteristics and Driving Factors of Rural Livelihood Transition in the East Coastal Region of China: A Case Study of Suburban Shanghai

Socio-economic Development and Land-Use Change: Analysis of Rural Housing Land Transition in the Transect of the Yangtse River, China

A socio-spatial exploration of rural livability satisfaction in megacity Beijing, China

Rural Poverty and Mobility in China: A National-Level Survey

Investigating the Influence of Transport Accessibility on Urban–rural Income Gaps

Association between Hometown Landholdings and Housing Quality of Rural Migrants in Urban Areas: Evidence from China

How to restore the livelihood resilience of the rural vulnerable? Evidence from 1,356 households in rural China

Social Capital Associated with Quality of Life Mediated by Employment Experiences: Evidence from a Random Sample of Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China

The Status of Perceived Community Resilience in Transitional Rural Society: an Empirical Study from Central China

Telecoupled Sustainable Livelihoods in an Era of Rural–Urban Dynamics: the Case of China

Sustainability and Risks of Rural Household Livelihoods in Ethnic Tourist Villages: Evidence from China

Identifying livelihood strategies and transitions in rural China: Is land holding an obstacle?

Interactions Between Sustainable Livelihood of Rural Household and Agricultural Land Transfer in the Mountainous and Hilly Regions of Sichuan, China

Risk preference and rural livelihood transitions in the hilly and mountainous region of southern China: a case study in Ruijin City