Best practices for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in masonry: stakeholder perspectives.

P. Entzel,J. Albers,L. Welch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APERGO.2006.08.004

IF: 3.94

2007-09-01

Applied Ergonomics

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Benefits of and strategies to update premium rates in the US National Flood Insurance Program under climate change

Fang Zhang,Ning Lin,Howard Kunreuther

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14048

Abstract:The United States' National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) has accumulated over $20 billion in debt to the US Treasury since 2005, partly due to discounted premiums on homes in flood-prone areas. To address this issue, FEMA introduced Risk Rating 2.0 in October 2021, which is able to assess and charge more accurate and equitable rates to homeowners. However, rates must be continually updated to account for increasing flood damage caused by sea level rise and more intense hurricanes due to climate change. This study proposes a strategy to adopt updated premium rates that account for climate change effects and address affordability and risk mitigation issues with a means-tested voucher program. The strategy is tested in a coastal community, Ortley Beach, NJ, by projecting its future flood risk under sea level rise and storm intensification. Compared with using static rates for all the properties in Ortley Beach, the proposed strategy is shown to reduce the NFIP's potential losses to the community from 2020 to 2050 by half (from $4.6 million to $2.3 million), improve the community's flood resistance, and address affordability concerns. Sensitivity analysis of varying incomes, loan interest rates, and conditions for a voucher indicates that the strategy is feasible and effective under a wide range of scenarios. Thus, the proposed strategy can be applied to various communities along the US coastline as an effective way of updating risk-based premiums while addressing affordability and resilience concerns.
Flood insurance redesigned: Regulatory considerations for a viable and sustainable private market

Rebecca Williams,Lorilee Medders,David Marlett,Catherine Lattimore,David Evans

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52227/26443.2023

2023-01-01

Journal of Insurance Regulation

Abstract:Several factors have converged in recent years, bringing the need for admitted-market, private flood insurance options in the U.S. to the fore. Meanwhile, other factors have coincided that make modeling and pricing large segments of the U.S. flood risk exposures more accessible and more accurate than was historically possible. The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), despite recent rating reforms, faces daunting financial and market challenges. The U.S. flood risk has increased: The risk of severe flooding and the cost of such events continues to grow. Flood loss models that can support granular pricing are now commercially available, outperforming the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA’s) flood maps historically used for rating and loss mitigation purposes. Several states have begun encouraging admitted insurance markets to provide flood insurance in addition to the NFIP and the excess and surplus lines coverages already available. This paper examines the private market opportunity and challenges, highlights state-level strategies, and demonstrates the importance of flexibility in program legislation and regulation—with respect to both program design and implementation. Our work contributes to the literature by: 1)exploring the market challenges in the development of private flood insurance; 2)demonstrating the importance of local risk considerations and flexible program features for state-level, private strategies that provide a sustainable framework for insurers to consider; and 3) highlighting the alignment of recent model laws and several state programs with the recommended features.
Exposing disparities in flood adaptation for equitable future interventions in the USA

Lidia Cano Pecharroman,ChangHoon Hahn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52111-0

2024-09-27

Abstract:As governments race to implement new climate adaptation solutions that prepare for more frequent flooding, they must seek policies that are effective for all communities and uphold climate justice. This requires evaluating policies not only on their overall effectiveness but also on whether they benefit all communities. Using the USA as an example, we illustrate the importance of considering such disparities for flood adaptation through a FEMA dataset of ~ 2.5 million flood insurance claims. We use CAUSALFLOW, a causal inference method based on deep generative models, to estimate the treatment effect of flood adaptation interventions based on a community's income, racial demographics, population, flood risk, educational attainment, and precipitation. We find that the program saves communities $5,000-15,000 per household. However, these savings are not evenly spread across communities. For example, for low-income communities savings sharply decline as flood-risk increases in contrast to their high-income counterparts. Even among low-income communities, savings are >$6,000 per household higher in predominantly white communities. Future flood adaptation efforts should go beyond reducing losses overall and aim to equitably support communities in the race for climate adaptation.
Exposing Disparities in Flood Adaptation for Equitable Future Interventions

Lidia Cano Pecharroman,ChangHoon Hahn

2023-12-07

Abstract:As governments race to implement new climate adaptation policies that prepare for more frequent flooding, they must seek policies that are effective for all communities and uphold climate justice. This requires evaluating policies not only on their overall effectiveness but also on whether their benefits are felt across all communities. We illustrate the importance of considering such disparities for flood adaptation using the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System and its dataset of $\sim$2.5 million flood insurance claims. We use ${\rm C{\scriptsize AUSAL}F{\scriptsize LOW}}$, a causal inference method based on deep generative models, to estimate the treatment effect of flood adaptation interventions based on a community's income, diversity, population, flood risk, educational attainment, and precipitation. We find that the program saves communities \$5,000--15,000 per household. However, these savings are not evenly spread across communities. For example, for low-income communities savings sharply decline as flood-risk increases in contrast to their high-income counterparts with all else equal. Even among low-income communities, there is a gap in savings between predominantly white and non-white communities: savings of predominantly white communities can be higher by more than \$6000 per household. As communities worldwide ramp up efforts to reduce losses inflicted by floods, simply prescribing a series flood adaptation measures is not enough. Programs must provide communities with the necessary technical and economic support to compensate for historical patterns of disenfranchisement, racism, and inequality. Future flood adaptation efforts should go beyond reducing losses overall and aim to close existing gaps to equitably support communities in the race for climate adaptation.

General Economics,Machine Learning,Applications
Assessing flood mitigation, management, and enforcement using insurance data, California and the USA

Naomi Kalman,Nicholas Pinter,Kathleen Schaefer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13078

2022-11-13

Abstract:Previous research found that National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) premiums collected in some U.S. states, including California, have far exceeded damage payments. However, this finding raises the question of whether such an imbalance represents systematically good flood management or, instead, merely short‐term hydrologic good luck. This study investigated patterns in flood losses on structures that pre‐date and post‐date the first available flood maps ("pre‐Flood Insurance Rate Map [FIRM]" vs. "post‐FIRM") in California, several peer states, and nationwide. California has a larger inheritance of pre‐FIRM structures than the national average, apparently reflecting development during the latter half of the 20th Century but before most Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood maps. Pre‐FIRM properties are a disproportionate cost burden on the system, and the number of pre‐FIRM policies has declined over time, but only slowly. Local patterns in pre‐FIRM claims suggest targeted areas for enhanced mitigation efforts, including buyouts. Conversely, we find that claims on post‐FIRM policies are a reasonable metric of good floodplain management and enforcement, and California's 38% of post‐FIRM policies generated just 24% of the state's NFIP claims. Local "post‐FIRM claim hotspots" suggest areas to examine more closely. California continues to be a net payer into the National Flood Insurance Program, with 2.3 billion in premiums collected, or 4.5 cents of premiums collected for every dollar of premiums. In California, its peer states, and nationwide, future management of flood risk depends on: (1) continued investment in flood control and mitigation of existing floodplain structures, and (2) prudent planning and limitations on new floodplain and coastal development.

engineering, environmental,water resources,geosciences, multidisciplinary
Mismatch between flood risk and insurance protection: A county-level analysis in the contiguous United States

Yang Xue,Xinyu Fu,Chaosu Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241294113

2024-10-25

Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science

Abstract:Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, Ahead of Print. Flood insurance plays a pivotal role in disaster management, providing the financial safety net for individuals and communities at risk. However, flood insurance penetration may not align with the actual flood risk over space. Using the National Risk Index and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Datasets, this study examines the county-level mismatch between flood risk and insurance protection across the contiguous United States, with an emphasis on both coastal and riverine flooding. Our findings indicate that, while a very limited number of high-risk counties are underinsured for coastal flooding, several high-risk counties experienced inadequate insurance protection for riverine flooding. These findings underscore the need for targeted policy interventions to improve flood risk awareness and insurance access in vulnerable areas facing the increasing impacts of climate change.

environmental studies,urban studies,regional & urban planning,geography
Socioeconomic implications of national flood insurance policy reform and flood insurance rate map revisions

Tim Frazier,Elizabeth E. Boyden,Erik Wood

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03990-1

IF: 3.158

2020-05-07

Natural Hazards

Abstract:Flooding exacerbated by climate change has resulted in more mandatory community participation in the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The purpose of this research is social regulatory floodplain criteria that may have an impact on various socioeconomic factors at the county and sub-county level. Updated mapping can result in widespread changes to the NFIP Special Flood Hazard Area, while no socioeconomic vulnerability assessments are completed before changes in risk designation or subsidy elimination occurs. These changes can result in additional compulsory flood insurance policies, heightened policy costs, and ultimately produce socioeconomic barriers for lower-income residents. The objectives include demonstrating the potential nationwide implications of increasing community risk with these changes to national policy through a case study from Ada County, Idaho where FEMA began updating the floodplain maps in 2015. Ada County was chosen for being reflective of other communities that may be suffering similar impacts from NFIP policy. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach was employed using semi-structured interviews, spatial analysis, and the Spatially Explicit Resilience-Vulnerability (SERV) model to assess potential community impacts. Results indicate increased vulnerability in the revised floodplain. Total annual sales volume, employee numbers, industry sectors, and overall community vulnerability are higher in the revised floodplain. Interviews with community leaders corroborated these results. This case study provides a foundation for further research on the impacts of flood insurance on communities across the USA while discussing the social injustice of a national program that is likely promoting the upward distribution of wealth county by county.

geosciences, multidisciplinary,water resources,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Policy tenure under the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

Erwann Michel-Kerjan,Sabine Lemoyne de Forges,Howard Kunreuther

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01671.x

Abstract:In the United States, insurance against flood hazard (inland flooding or storm surge from hurricanes) has been provided mainly through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) since 1968. The NFIP covers $1.23 trillion of assets today. This article provides the first analysis of flood insurance tenure ever undertaken: that is, the number of years that people keep their flood insurance policy before letting it lapse. Our analysis of the entire portfolio of the NFIP over the period 2001-2009 reveals that the median tenure of new policies during that time is between two and four years; it is also relatively stable over time and levels of flood hazard. Prior flood experience can affect tenure: people who have experienced small flood claims tend to hold onto their insurance longer; people who have experienced large flood claims tend to let their insurance lapse sooner. To overcome the policy and governance challenges posed by homeowners' inadequate insurance coverage, we discuss policy recommendations that include for banks and government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) strengthening their requirements and the introduction of multiyear flood insurance contracts attached to the property, both of which are likely to provide more coverage stability and encourage investments in risk-reduction measures.
The Impact of Climate Change on Resilience of Communities Vulnerable to Riverine Flooding

Xianwu Xue,Naiyu Wang,Bruce R. Ellingwood,Ke Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77544-9_8

2018-01-01

Abstract:Riverine flooding due to intense precipitation or snowmelt is one of the most devastating natural hazards in the United States in terms of annual damages and economic losses to the built environment and social impacts on communities. Flood inundation mapping, where the likely depths of extreme floods are placed on a map of the community, is important for evaluating flood risks and for enhancing community resilience. However, the Flood Insurance Rate Maps developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency are not adequate for the evolving needs for community resilience assessment and decision-making over the next century, during which climate change effects are likely to be significant. In this study, we develop a flood hazard modeling framework to support community resilience assessment. This framework couples a hydrological model, which simulates the hydrological processes in a community at a coarser resolution using measured and/or remote sensed precipitation, with a hydraulic analysis module, which computes localized flood depths, velocities and inundated areas at a finer spatial resolution. The Wolf River Basin in Shelby County, Tennessee, which includes the city of Memphis, is used as a testbed to calibrate and validate this coupled model using precipitation and streamflow data obtained from gauge stations operated by the US Geological Survey and to illustrate the potential impacts of climate change in the 21st Century on civil infrastructure, revealing that such impacts are non-negligible but are manageable by proper engineering.
Properties and mechanisms of production and action of endothelium-derived relaxing factor.

U. Förstermann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005344-198600101-00010

IF: 3.271

Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology

Abstract:A brief review is given of the vasodilators that require an intact vascular endothelium to exert their relaxing effect. Then some major issues of the phenomenon of endothelium-dependent smooth muscle relaxation are discussed in more detail: The chemical structure of the endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF), which mediates this type of vasodilation, is still unclear. There is agreement that EDRF is chemically unstable, but determinations of its biological half-life have yielded discrepant values (6-50 s). Recent evidence suggests that oxygen and/or activated oxygen species accelerate the evanescence of the factor. The biochemical mechanisms involved in the production of EDRF are still largely unknown. Both stimulators of phospholipase A2 and inhibitors of lysolecithin acyltransferase were found to induce EDRF-mediated relaxation, while several phospholipase inhibitors block these relaxations. These findings suggest that cleavage of phospholipids (and formation of free fatty acids and lysophosphatides) play an important role in EDRF production. EDRF-mediated relaxations are associated with increased levels of cyclic GMP in vascular smooth muscle cells. Endothelial cells were found to produce a factor that directly stimulates the enzymatic activity of soluble guanylate cyclase. This stimulating factor is likely to be identical with EDRF. The significance of the endothelium-dependent relaxing mechanism in resistance vessels is still largely unclear. In the blood-perfused hind limb of the rabbit, two irreversible inhibitors of endothelium-dependent vasodilation (gossypol and p-bromophenacyl-bromide) blocked the vasodilation induced by the endothelium-dependent agent acetylcholine, but not the response to the endothelium-independent vasodilator prostaglandin E1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Nephelometric method for determination of rheumatoid factor.

G. Virella,M. Waller,H. Fudenberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(78)90032-7

Abstract:
Participation in the Community Rating System of NFIP: an Empirical Analysis of North Carolina Counties

Craig E. Landry,Jingyuan Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1848264

2012-01-01

Natural Hazards Review

Abstract:In order to motivate flood insurance purchase and promote flood hazard awareness and mitigation, the Community Rating System (CRS) of National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), credits floodplain management activities and awards flood insurance premium discounts. CRS, however, has been marked by a lack of active participation since its inception. The objective of this study is to provide empirical evidence related to community decisions involving incentive-based flood risk mitigation projects. We test a number of hypotheses offered by previous researchers regarding factors that motivate local hazard management initiatives through an examination of patterns in CRS participation across all 100 North Carolina counties from 1991 to 2002. Specifically, we examine the influence of flood experience, hydrological risk, local capacity, and socioeconomic factors on county hazard mitigation decisions. Results indicate that flood history and physical risk factors increase likelihood of local hazard mitigation adoption. We find evidence that the probability of CRS participation is lower in counties with a greater proportion of senior citizens and greater level of education, and that flood hazard mitigation activities at the county level are more likely when a greater number of nested of municipalities participate in CRS.
The effect of subsidized flood insurance on real estate markets

Nicola Garbarino,Benjamin Guin,Jonathan Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12491

IF: 1.452

2024-11-06

Journal of Risk & Insurance

Abstract:Subsidized insurance against extreme weather events improves affordability among households in at‐risk areas but it can weaken the risk signal via property prices. Leveraging a granular data set of all property transactions and flood events in England, we study the effects of a reinsurance scheme that lowers insurance premiums for at‐risk properties. We document that the introduction of this scheme increases prices and transaction volumes of flood‐prone properties. This fully offsets the negative direct effects of flooding on property prices, with high‐income areas and high‐value properties benefiting relatively more. Our findings speak to the debate on climate adaptation policies and their consequences for wealth distribution.

economics,business, finance
Community Flood Impacts and Infrastructure: Examining National Flood Impacts Using a High Precision Assessment Tool in the United States

Jeremy R. Porter,Evelyn Shu,Michael Amodeo,Ho Hsieh,Ziyan Chu,Neil Freeman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13213125

IF: 3.53

2021-11-05

Water

Abstract:Changing environmental conditions are driving worsening flood events, with consequences for counties, cities, towns, and local communities. To understand individual flood risk within this changing climate, local community resiliency and infrastructure impacts must also be considered. Past research has attempted to capture this but has faced several limitations. This study provides a nation-wide model of community flooding impacts within the United States currently and in 30 years through the use of high-resolution input data (parcel-level), multi-source flood hazard information (four major flood types), multi-return period hazard information (six return periods), operational threshold integration, and future-facing projections. Impacts are quantified here as the level of flooding relative to operational thresholds. This study finds that over the next 30 years, millions of additional properties will be impacted, as aspects of risk are expected to increase for residential properties by 10%, roads by 3%, commercial properties by 7%, critical infrastructure facilities by 6%, and social infrastructure facilities by 9%. Additionally, certain counties and cities persistently display impact patterns. A high-resolution model capturing aspects of flood risk as related to community infrastructure is important for an understanding of overall community risk.

environmental sciences,water resources
'Scarier than another storm': values at risk in the mapping and insuring of US floodplains

Rebecca Elliott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12381

Abstract:How do people respond to the ways in which insurance mediates environmental risks? Socio-cultural risk research has characterized and analyzed the experiential dimension of risk, but has yet to focus on insurance, which is a key institution shaping how people understand and relate to risk. Insurance not only assesses and communicates risk; it also economizes it, making the problem on the ground not just one of risk, but also of value. This article addresses these issues with an investigation of the social life of the flood insurance rate map, the central technology of the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), as it grafts a new landscape of 'value at risk' onto the physical and social world of New York City in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. Like other risk technologies, ubiquitous in modern societies as decision-making and planning tools, the map disseminates information about value and risk in order to tame uncertainty and enable prudent action oriented toward the future. However, drawing together interview, ethnographic, and documentary data, I find that for its users on the ground, the map does not simply measure 'value at risk' in ways that produce clear strategies for protecting property values from flooding. Instead, it puts values-beyond simply the financial worth of places-at risk, as well as implicates past, present, and future risks beyond simply flooding. By informing and enlarging the stakes of what needs protecting, and from what, I argue that plural and interacting 'values at risk' shape how people live with and respond to environmental risks that are mediated by insurance technologies.
Inequitable patterns of US flood risk in the Anthropocene

Oliver E. J. Wing,William Lehman,Paul D. Bates,Christopher C. Sampson,Niall Quinn,Andrew M. Smith,Jeffrey C. Neal,Jeremy R. Porter,Carolyn Kousky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01265-6

IF: 30.7

2022-01-31

Nature Climate Change

Abstract:Abstract Current flood risk mapping, relying on historical observations, fails to account for increasing threat under climate change. Incorporating recent developments in inundation modelling, here we show a 26.4% (24.1–29.1%) increase in US flood risk by 2050 due to climate change alone under RCP4.5. Our national depiction of comprehensive and high-resolution flood risk estimates in the United States indicates current average annual losses of US$32.1 billion (US$30.5–33.8 billion) in 2020’s climate, which are borne disproportionately by poorer communities with a proportionally larger White population. The future increase in risk will disproportionately impact Black communities, while remaining concentrated on the Atlantic and Gulf coasts. Furthermore, projected population change (SSP2) could cause flood risk increases that outweigh the impact of climate change fourfold. These results make clear the need for adaptation to flood and emergent climate risks in the United States, with mitigation required to prevent the acceleration of these risks.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Attitudes toward moving or staying and buying flood insurance to face varied flood threats in a floodplain community

Luis-Angel Gomez-Cunya,Meghna Babbar-Sebens,Desiree Tullos,Jenna Tilt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104432

IF: 4.842

2024-03-27

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Abstract:Demographics and possession of flood insurance are among the factors influencing flood response and recovery actions adopted by individuals, such as deciding to either move out of their homes or stay. It is essential to consider residents' attitudes to help policies prepare for the social and economic impacts of flooding. In some urban areas situated in floodplains, climate change has caused an increase in the severity of flooding. This research project focused on residents living within riverine floodplain areas delimited by FEMA and their attitudes regarding relocation under flood varied threats. A household survey in the United States was conducted in Corvallis, Oregon, which presented participants with different flood threat scenarios involving varying water depths and frequencies. After selecting predictors by applying a collinearity constraint, logistic regression was used to find significant predictors of individuals' attitudes toward moving out of their homes or staying at home and buying or upgrading flood insurance under varied flood threats. The results showed that some low or unknown-magnitude flood scenarios produced statistically significant models to predict mobility, but high-magnitude flooding did not yield statistically significant models. For example, flood insurance possession was the only significant predictor for staying after flooding in various scenarios. A more robust understanding of these interdependencies should increase the effectiveness of growing awareness of environmental threats and participation in risk-reducing behaviors.

geosciences, multidisciplinary,meteorology & atmospheric sciences,water resources
Insurability and government-funded mitigation: safer but costlier

Dahui Liu,Linda Nozick,Meghan Millea,Jamie Kruse,Rachel Davidson,Joseph Trainor,Junkan Li,Caroline Williams

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-024-00342-z

2024-11-28

The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice

Abstract:Hurricanes significantly harm homeowners through physical damage and long-term financial strain due to rising insurance costs, property value loss, and repair expenses. This paper focuses on the interrelated decisions of the government mitigation funding of residential acquisitions and retrofit subsidies and of price restrictions on the insurance market in eastern North Carolina to determine the financial effects on stakeholders. The introduction of these policy interventions have impacts that propagate through the system due to risk adjustments, homeowner take-up behaviour, and insurer profit-maximising behaviour. This study uses an integrated game theoretic model to demonstrate that there are cost-effective government spending levels that reduce residential loss from hurricane damage. When insurance prices are capped at preintervention levels, the number of households and their distribution of losses, which has been altered through mitigation, leads to increased insurer insolvency. When insurance prices are allowed to adjust after mitigation, some homeowners find insurance is no longer affordable. This highlights the tradeoff between ensuring insurer stability and expanding homeowner insurance accessibility.

business, finance
RECENT RESEARCH ON RED SQUILL AS A RODENTICIDE

A. J. Verbiscar,Thomas F. Banagan,H. S. Gentry

Abstract:Author(s): Verbiscar, Anthony J.; Banigan, Thomas F.; Gentry, Howard Scott | Abstract: Red squill has been used in rodent control for several hundred years but in the United States its use has decreased since the 1950s. However, there is now a recognized need for rodenticides with different kinds of toxic activity. Red squill is being investigated as an acute rodenticide and an economic crop for the southwestern states. Clones from a prior USDA collection have been assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography and selections are being propagated in California and Arizona. The major toxicant, scilliroside, is relatively fast acting, causing convulsions and death to rats and mice. This glycoside is also strongly emetic to humans, cats and dogs, affording a safety factor uncommon to high-toxicity rodenticides. Our chemical, processing, agronomic, and toxicological studies are a technical basis for further developing this potentially superior rodenticide.
Flooding is Not Like Filling a Bath

Brett F. Sanders,Oliver E. J. Wing,Paul D. Bates

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ef005164

2024-12-06

Earth's Future

Abstract:Damage and disruption from flooding have rapidly escalated over recent decades. Knowing who and what is at risk, how these risks are changing, and what is driving these changes is of immense importance to flood management and policy. Accurate predictions of flood risk are also critical to public safety. However, many high‐profile research studies reporting risks at national and global scales rely upon a significant oversimplification of how floods behave—as a level pool—an approach known as bathtub modeling that is avoided in flood management practice due to known biases (e.g., >200% error in flood area) compared to physics‐based modeling. With publicity by news media, findings that would likely not be trusted by flood management professionals are thus widely communicated to policy makers and the public, scientific credibility is put at risk, and maladaptation becomes more likely. Here, we call upon researchers to abandon the practice of bathtub modeling in flood risk studies, and for those involved in the peer‐review process to ensure the conclusions of impact analyses are consistent with the limitations of the assumed flood physics. We document biases and uncertainties from bathtub modeling in both coastal and inland geographies, and we present examples of physics‐based modeling approaches suited to large‐scale applications. Reducing biases and uncertainties in flood hazard estimates will sharpen scientific understanding of changing risks, better serve the needs of policy makers, enable news media to more objectively report present and future risks to the public, and better inform adaptation planning.

geosciences, multidisciplinary,environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences

Best practices for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in masonry: stakeholder perspectives.

Benefits of and strategies to update premium rates in the US National Flood Insurance Program under climate change

Flood insurance redesigned: Regulatory considerations for a viable and sustainable private market

Exposing disparities in flood adaptation for equitable future interventions in the USA

Exposing Disparities in Flood Adaptation for Equitable Future Interventions

Assessing flood mitigation, management, and enforcement using insurance data, California and the USA

Mismatch between flood risk and insurance protection: A county-level analysis in the contiguous United States

Socioeconomic implications of national flood insurance policy reform and flood insurance rate map revisions

Policy tenure under the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

The Impact of Climate Change on Resilience of Communities Vulnerable to Riverine Flooding

Properties and mechanisms of production and action of endothelium-derived relaxing factor.

Nephelometric method for determination of rheumatoid factor.

Participation in the Community Rating System of NFIP: an Empirical Analysis of North Carolina Counties

The effect of subsidized flood insurance on real estate markets

Community Flood Impacts and Infrastructure: Examining National Flood Impacts Using a High Precision Assessment Tool in the United States

'Scarier than another storm': values at risk in the mapping and insuring of US floodplains

Inequitable patterns of US flood risk in the Anthropocene

Attitudes toward moving or staying and buying flood insurance to face varied flood threats in a floodplain community

Insurability and government-funded mitigation: safer but costlier

RECENT RESEARCH ON RED SQUILL AS A RODENTICIDE

Flooding is Not Like Filling a Bath