Crosstalk between gut microbiota and tumor: tumors could cause gut dysbiosis and metabolic imbalance
Siyuan Zhang,Haimei Wen,Ying Chen,Jingya Ning,Di Hu,Yujiao Dong,Chenyu Yao,Bo Yuan,Shuanying Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13763
2024-11-28
Molecular Oncology
Abstract:In this research, we analyzed the relationship between gut microbiota and tumor. We discovered that both subcutaneous and metastatic tumors would alter the composition and metabolic function of gut microbiota. Meanwhile, fecal microbiota transplantation also indicated the anti‐tumor role of the gut microbiota, revealing the crosstalk between tumor and gut microbiota. Gut microbiota has a proven link with the development and treatment of cancer. However, the causality between gut microbiota and cancer development is still unknown and deserves exploration. In this study, we aimed to explore the alterations in gut microbiota in murine tumor models and the crosstalk between the tumor and the gut microbiota. The subcutaneous and intravenous murine tumor models using both the colorectal cancer cell line MC38 and lung cancer cell line LLC were constructed. Then fecal samples before and after tumor inoculation were collected for whole metagenomics sequencing. Both subcutaneous and metastatic tumors markedly elevated the α‐diversity of the gut microbiota. Relative abundance of Ligilactobacillus and Lactobacillus was reduced after subcutaneously inoculating tumor cells, whereas Bacteroides and Duncaniella were reduced in metastatic tumors, regardless of tumor type. At the species level, Lachnospiraceae bacterium was enriched after both subcutaneous and intravenous tumors inoculation, whereas levels of Muribaculaceae bacterium Isolate‐110 (HZI), Ligilactobacillus murinus and Bacteroides acidifaciens reduced. Metabolic function analysis showed that the reductive pentose phosphate cycle, urea cycle, ketone body biosynthesis, ectoine biosynthesis, C4‐dicarboxylic acid cycle, isoleucine biosynthesis, inosine 5′‐monophosphate (IMP), and uridine 5′‐monophosphate (UMP) biosynthesis were elevated after tumor inoculation, whereas the cofactor and vitamin biosynthesis were deficient. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) showed that subcutaneous and metastatic tumors partially shared the same effect patterns on gut microbiota. Furthermore, fecal microbiota transplantation revealed that this altered microbiota could influence tumor growth. Taken together, this study demonstrated that both colorectal cancer (MC38) and non‐colorectal cancer (LLC) can cause gut dysbiosis and metabolic imbalance, regardless of tumor type and process of tumor inoculation, and this dysbiosis influenced the tumor growth. This research gives novel insights into the crosstalk between tumors and the gut microbiota.
oncology