Abstract:Introduction Involuntary treatments in forensic psychiatry represents a complex intersection of mental health, legal systems and ethics. Judicial authorities may compulsorily refer children to inpatient clinics for receiving necessarily treatment. Despite its importance, there is limited research on the reasons behind and effectiveness of such interventions in minors. Objectives The objectives of this study were to describe the clinical characteristics of minors who have risks of harming themselves and/or others so receiving involuntary treatment due to a court order. It is aimed to assess the effectiveness of involuntary treatment. Methods A follow-up case series was conducted on 9 minors who hospitalized by court orders in a secure inpatient child and adolescent psychiatry clinic, in the year of 2023. Data collected from medical records, including demographic information, clinical presentation, diagnosis and discharge treatment. After one, three and six month of the discharge, interviews made with the patients and their families. Current data collected on treatment regimen, compliance, behavioral outcomes and reoffending rates. All data were anonymized to maintain patient confidentiality. Results The case series consisted of 3 males and 6 females, with a mean age of 16.5 years at the time of admission. The most common reason to hospitalization was homicide risk 88%, followed by substance use 66%. Conduct Disorder was the most common diagnosis with the rate of 88%, followed by Substance Use Disorder(66%) and Attention Deficit and Hiperactivity Disorder(50%). 44% of minors had a history of juvenile delinquency. School dropout rates were 100%. Treatment consisted of a combination of individual and group therapy and medication. Treatment refusal rates were 88% so in terms of treatment, 88% of the minors in this sample treated with depot form antipsychotic medications, with the most common medication being risperidone. Overall all of the sample showed a significant reduction in disruptive behaviors during their hospital stay. Follow-up data collecting is still continue and preliminary statistics show us that relapse rates are low and treatment compliance is relatively high of the sample. Conclusions The findings suggest that involuntary hospitalization can be effective in reducing disruptive behaviors and increasing treatment compliance in minors with conduct disorders, substance abuse disorders and a history of juvenile delinquency. These results underscore the need for comprehensive, multidisciplinary approaches that integrate psychiatric treatment, psychoeducation and social support. Given the relatively small sample size and short-term follow-up, further research is needed to determine the long-term effects of involuntary treatment and to identify factors that predict treatment response. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Protecting Health and Safety with Needed-Treatment: the Effectiveness of Outpatient Commitment

Need for Treatment, A Less Restrictive Alternative to Hospitalization, and Treatment Provision: The Utility of Community Treatment Orders

Randomized and non-randomized evidence for the effect of compulsory community and involuntary out-patient treatment on health service use: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cochrane Meta-Analysis Fuels Invalid Skepticism About Compulsory Community Treatment Effectiveness

Latest findings highlight the continuing uncertainty over the utility of compulsory psychiatric treatment in the community

The benefits and harms of community treatment orders for people diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses: A rapid umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

The long‐term adherence following the end of Community Treatment Order: A systematic review

Staff supported community outings among forensic mental health patients: patient characteristics, rehabilitative goals, and (the absence of) adverse outcomes

Involuntary Psychiatric Hospitalization of Minors Due to Court Orders: Effectiveness Assessing Through a Case Series

Can epidemiological studies assist in the evaluation of community treatment orders? - The experience of Western Australia and Nova Scotia.

[Involuntary hospitalization and treatment: the interface between psychiatry and law]

The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review

How bad is civil commitment? A study of attitudes toward violence and involuntary hospitalization

A pilot study of the utilisation and outcome of community orders: client, carer, case manager and Mental Health Review Tribunal perspective

Addressing Mental Health Disability in Unsheltered Homelessness: Outpatient Conservatorship in Los Angeles

Competing Concerns in Efforts to Reduce Criminal Legal Contact Among People with Serious Mental Illnesses: Findings from a Multi-City Study on Misdemeanor Arrests

Follow-up Psychiatric Care and Risk of Readmission in Patients with Serious Mental Illness in State Funded or Operated Facilities

Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review

Long-term efficacy of a continuity-of-care treatment model for patients with severe mental illness who transition from in-patient to out-patient services

Acute treatment of inpatients with psychotic symptoms using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Pilot results

An Ethicolegal Analysis of Involuntary Treatment for Opioid Use Disorders