Abstract:Our study shows that, to enhance fish diversity, it is important to provide three‐dimensional habitat architecture that incorporates a wide range of microhabitat sizes and types. Our findings also highlight some key considerations when assessing the performance of intervention designs, including spatial‐scale dependent effects of structural complexity, diel variation in fish‐microhabitat relationships, and choice of intervention assessment metric (i.e. taxonomic vs. functional diversity). The diversity‐habitat complexity relationship has been utilised widely in conservation and biodiversity enhancement interventions, but few studies have attempted to tease apart the components of complexity that drive this relationship. The ecological engineering of seawalls is one area where this topic has advanced, albeit not often at scales relevant to fish. We constructed habitat enhancement units (Simple, Complex and Freestyle 'fish houses') out of hollow concrete blocks and installed them at the base of tropical rip‐rap seawalls. Simple and Complex fish houses were cuboid, had the same surface area and volume and included 100 holes (microhabitats). The holes in Simple fish houses were all the same size, whereas 25 size variations were used in the Complex design (volume‐independent manipulation of a single complexity element). The Freestyle fish house was non‐cuboid and had more overall volume, microhabitat types and sizes. We examined the volume‐independent (Simple vs. Complex fish houses) and volume‐dependent (Freestyle fish house) effects of microhabitat complexity on fish taxonomic and functional assemblage metrics at two spatial scales and across diel cycles. We also investigated diurnal and nocturnal fish‐microhabitat size relationships. There was a modest, but not significant, volume‐independent effect of complexity on fish assemblages. The Freestyle design, however, supported significantly greater abundance, species richness, and distinct taxonomic and functional compositions. These results were dependent on spatial scales and diel cycles. Diel variation in fish activity patterns resulted in stronger size‐matching relationships between fish and microhabitats at night than during the day. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that, to enhance fish diversity, it is important to provide three‐dimensional habitat architecture that incorporates a wide range of microhabitat sizes and types. Our findings also highlight some key considerations when assessing the performance of intervention designs, including spatial‐scale dependent effects of structural complexity, diel variation in fish‐microhabitat relationships, and choice of intervention assessment metric (i.e. taxonomic vs. functional diversity).

Artificial reef design: void space, complexity, and attractants

Artificial reef design affects benthic secondary productivity and provision of functional habitat

Quarry rock reef design features influence fish assemblage structure across a systematically heterogenous restoration reef.

Fish assemblages of three common artificial reef designs during early colonization

"Another Kid on the Block": Testing the Effects of Artificial Substrates on the Recruitment of Juvenile Fishes in the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico

Theory, practice, and design criteria for utilizing artificial reefs to increase production of marine fishes

Assessing the Attractive Effects of Floating Artificial Reefs and Combination Reefs on Six Local Marine Species

Artificial structure selection by economically important reef fishes at North Carolina artificial reefs

Moderate relative size of covered and non-covered structures of artificial reef enhances the sheltering effect on reef fish

Reef Effect of Vertical Relief on the Shelter-Seeking and Foraging Processes of Juvenile Fat Greenling (hexagrammos Otakii) in a Mesocosm Experiment

Fish responses to manipulated microhabitat complexity in urbanised shorelines

Artificial reefs: a review of their design, application, management and performance

Establishing complexity targets to enhance artificial reef designs

Modelling the distribution of fish around an artificial reef

One-Year Colonization by Zoobenthic Species on an Eco-Friendly Artificial Reef in the English Channel Intertidal Zone

Data-Driven Coral Reef Rehabilitation Using New Biomimicking, Advanced Materials Artificial Reefs

Effects of a New Artificial Reef Complex on Red Snapper and the Associated Fish Community: an Evaluation Using a Before–After Control–Impact Approach

Experimental Study on the Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Artificial Reefs

Experimental Study on Fish Attractive Effects of Artificial Reef Models

Experimental Investigation of Local Scour Around Artificial Reefs in Steady Currents

Investigating the Functional Role of an Artificial Reef Within an Estuarine Seascape: a Case Study of Yellowfin Bream (Acanthopagrus australis)