Abstract:Background: Implementation of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) protocols remains low. Protocol compliance among anesthesiologists tends to be suboptimal owing to the high workload and the attention required for implementation. The assisted fluid management (AFM) system is a novel decision support tool designed to help clinicians apply GDFT protocols. This system predicts fluid responsiveness better than anesthesia practitioners do and achieves higher stroke volume (SV) and cardiac index values during surgery. We tested the hypothesis that an AFM-guided GDFT strategy would also be associated with better sublingual microvascular flow compared to a standard GDFT strategy. Methods: This bicenter, parallel, 2-arm, prospective, randomized controlled, patient and assessor-blinded, superiority study considered for inclusion all consecutive patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery who required an arterial catheter and uncalibrated SV monitoring. Patients having standard GDFT received manual titration of fluid challenges to optimize SV while patients having an AFM-guided GDFT strategy received fluid challenges based on recommendations from the AFM software. In all patients, fluid challenges were standardized and titrated per 250 mL and vasopressors were administered to maintain a mean arterial pressure >70 mm Hg. The primary outcome (average of each patient's intraoperative microvascular flow index (MFI) across 4 intraoperative time points) was analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test and the treatment effect was estimated with a median difference between groups with a 95% confidence interval estimated using the bootstrap percentile method (with 1000 replications). Secondary outcomes included SV, cardiac index, total amount of fluid, other microcirculatory variables, and postoperative lactate. Results: A total of 86 patients were enrolled over a 7-month period. The primary outcome was significantly higher in patients with AFM (median [Q1-Q3]: 2.89 [2.84-2.94]) versus those having standard GDFT (2.59 [2.38-2.78] points, median difference 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.49; P < .001). Cardiac index and SVI were higher (3.2 ± 0.5 vs 2.7 ± 0.7 l.min-1.m-2; P = .001 and 42 [35-47] vs 36 [32-43] mL.m-2; P = .018) and arterial lactate concentration was lower at the end of the surgery in patients having AFM-guided GDFT (2.1 [1.5-3.1] vs 2.9 [2.1-3.9] mmol.L-1; P = .026) than patients having standard GDFT strategy. Patients having AFM received a higher fluid volume but 3 times less norepinephrine than those receiving standard GDFT (P < .001). Conclusions: Use of an AFM-guided GDFT strategy resulted in higher sublingual microvascular flow during surgery compared to use of a standard GDFT strategy. Future trials are necessary to make conclusive recommendations that will change clinical practice.

Mini fluid chAllenge aNd End-expiratory occlusion test to assess flUid responsiVEness in the opeRating room (MANEUVER study): A multicentre cohort study

Can Ultrasonographic Measurement of Respiratory Variability in the Diameter of the Internal Jugular Vein and the Subclavian Vein Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Parturients During Cesarean Delivery? A Prospective Cohort Study

Goal-directed Fluid Optimization Based on Stroke Volume Variation and Cardiac Index During One-Lung Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopy Lobectomy Operations: a Pilot Study

End-expiratory occlusion test predicts fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgical patients in the operating theatre.

Fluid challenges in operating room: A planned sub study of the Fluid Day observational study

Reliability of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in assessing fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a metanalysis and a metaregression

Does a two-minute mini-fluid challenge predict fluid responsiveness in pediatric patients under general anesthesia?

Assessing fluid responsiveness with ultrasound in the neonatal intensive care setting: the mini-fluid challenge

Evaluation of Fluid Responsiveness with Dynamic Superior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Fluid Optimisation in Emergency Laparotomy (FLO-ELA) Trial: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised trial of cardiac output-guided fluid therapy compared to usual care in patients undergoing major emergency gastrointestinal surgery

Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy

Fluid responsiveness assessment using inferior vena cava collapsibility among spontaneously breathing patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Novel parameters for predicting fluid responsiveness during the mini fluid challenge and ability of the cardiac power index: an observational cohort study

Incidence, predictability, and outcomes of systemic venous congestion following a fluid challenge in initially fluid-tolerant preload-responders after cardiac surgery: a pilot trial

Do ScvO2 variations induced by passive leg raising predict fluid responsiveness? A prospective study

Assisted Fluid Management and Sublingual Microvascular Flow During High-Risk Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Capillary refill time assessment after fluid challenge in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective study

Comparison of superior and inferior vena cava diameter variation measured with transthoracic echocardiography to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients after abdominal surgery

Emergency department non-invasive cardiac output study (EDNICO): a feasibility and repeatability study

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Using Pulse Pressure Variation in Thoracic Surgery Requiring One-Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Intraoperative Fluid Management on Postoperative Outcomes: A Hospital Registry Study