ACCELERATE: A Patient-Powered Natural History Study Design Enabling Clinical and Therapeutic Discoveries in a Rare Disorder

Sheila K Pierson,Johnson S Khor,Jasira Ziglar,Amy Liu,Katherine Floess,Erin NaPier,Alexander M Gorzewski,Mark-Avery Tamakloe,Victoria Powers,Faizaan Akhter,Eric Haljasmaa,Raj Jayanthan,Arthur Rubenstein,Mileva Repasky,Kojo Elenitoba-Johnson,Jason Ruth,Bette Jacobs,Matthew Streetly,Linus Angenendt,Jose Luis Patier,Simone Ferrero,Pier Luigi Zinzani,Louis Terriou,Corey Casper,Elaine Jaffe,Christian Hoffmann,Eric Oksenhendler,Alexander Fosså,Gordan Srkalovic,Amy Chadburn,Thomas S Uldrick,Megan Lim,Frits van Rhee,David C Fajgenbaum
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100158
2020-12-22
Abstract:Geographically dispersed patients, inconsistent treatment tracking, and limited infrastructure slow research for many orphan diseases. We assess the feasibility of a patient-powered study design to overcome these challenges for Castleman disease, a rare hematologic disorder. Here, we report initial results from the ACCELERATE natural history registry. ACCELERATE includes a traditional physician-reported arm and a patient-powered arm, which enables patients to directly contribute medical data and biospecimens. This study design enables successful enrollment, with the 5-year minimum enrollment goal being met in 2 years. A median of 683 clinical, laboratory, and imaging data elements are captured per patient in the patient-powered arm compared with 37 in the physician-reported arm. These data reveal subgrouping characteristics, identify off-label treatments, support treatment guidelines, and are used in 17 clinical and translational studies. This feasibility study demonstrates that the direct-to-patient design is effective for collecting natural history data and biospecimens, tracking therapies, and providing critical research infrastructure.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?